Evaluation methods in health promotion programmes: The description of a triangulation in Brazil;Métodos em avaliação de programas de promoção da saúde: Descrição de uma triangulação no Brasil

Ciencia e Saude Coletiva

Volumn 15, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 2521-2532

  de Souza, Elza Maria ^a  

^a Health Sciences of the Escola Superior de Ciências da Saúde   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Evaluation; Health promotion; Intergenerational interaction; Social capital; Theoretical framework; Triangulation

Indexed keywords

EID: 77957229318     PISSN: 14138123     EISSN: 16784561     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/s1413-81232010000500026     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. World Health Organisation. Health programme evaluation: guiding principles. Geneva: WHO; 1981.
2. World Health Organisation. The Ottawa Charter. Geneva: WHO; 1986.
3. Campbell C, Wood R, Kelly M. Social Capital and Health. London: Health Education Authority; 1999.
4. Glass AT. Psychosocial intervention. In: Berkman L, Kawachi I, editors. Social Epidemiology. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000. p. 267-305.
5. Tones K. Effectiveness in health promotion: indicators of success. In: Scott D, Weston R, editors. Evaluating health promotion. Cheltenham: Stanley Thornes; 1998. p. 49-74.
6. Thorogood M, Britton A. Evaluating interventions - experimental study designs in health promotion. In: Practice and evaluating health promotion: practice and methods. Oxford: University Press; 2000. p. 41-56.
7. Peersman G. Promoting health: principles of practice and evaluation. In: Oliver S, Peersman G, editors. Using Research for Effective Health Promotion. Philadelphia: Open University Press; 2000. p. 13-15.
8. Coombes Y. Combining quantitative and qualitative approaches to evaluation. In: Thorogood M, Coombes Y. Evaluating Health Promotion: Practice and Methods. Oxford: University Press; 2000. p. 27-40.
9. Minayo MCS, Assis SG, Souza ER. Avaliação por triangulação de métodos: abordagem de programas sociais. Rio de Janeiro: Fiocruz; 2005.
10. Branigan P, Mitchell K. The role of focus groups. In: Thorogood M, Coombes Y. Evaluating health promotion: practice and methods. Oxford: University Press; 2000. p. 57-69.
11. Rothman KJ. Types of epidemiology studies. Modern Epidemiology. Boston/Toronto: Little, Brown and Company; 1986.
12. Souza EM. Intergenerational interaction in health promotion: a qualitative study in Brazil. Rev. Saude Publica 2003; 37(4):463-469.
13. Souza EM. Intergenerational relationships as a means of changing attitudes and promoting health. A multimethodology study in Ceilândia, Distrito Federal of Brazil [thesis]. London: London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, University of London; 2004.
14. Souza EM, Grundy E. Intergenerational interaction, social capital and health: results from a randomized controlled trial in Brazil. Soc Sci Med 2007; 65(7):1397-1409.
15. Coombes Y, Thorogood M. Introduction Chapter. In: Thorogood M, Coombes Y. Evaluating Health Promotion: Practice and Methods. Oxford: University Press; 2000.
16. Thompson B, Kinne S. Social changes theory: applications to community health. In: Bracht N. Health Promotion at the community level. London: Sage Publications; 1999. p. 29-46.
17. Ajzen I, Fishbein M. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1980.
18. Bandura A. Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1977.
19. Freire P. Education for critical conscientiousness. New York: Seabury; 1973/1974.
20. World Health Organisation. Long range world populations projections: based on the 1998 Revision. [cited 2001 Feb 23]. Available from: http://www.undp.org/popin/wdtrends/longrange/exesummary.htm
21. Companhia de Desenvolvimento do Planalto Central. Pesquisa socioeconômica das famílias do Distrito Federal. Brasília: PISEF; 2000.
22. Neikrug SM. The value of gerontological knowledge for elders: a study of the relationship between knowledge on ageing and worry about the future. Educ Gerontol 1998; 24:287-296.
23. Lwanga SK, Lemewsh S. Sample size determination in health studies: A practical manual. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1991.
24. Veras RP. A survey of health of elderly people in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil [thesis]. London: University of London; 1992.
25. Kawachi I, Kennedy BP, Glass R. Social capital, and self-related health: a contextual analysis. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1999; 89(8):1187-1193.
26. Bajekal M, Purdon S. Social capital and social exclusion: development of a condensed module for the health survey for England. London: National Centre for Social Research; 2001.
27. Butler R. The life review: an interpretation of reminiscence in the aged. Psychiatry 1963; 26 (1):65-76.
28. Souza EM. Reminiscências integrando gerações: a arte de compartilhar memórias. Rio de Janeiro: Vozes; 1999.
29. Coleman PG. Ageing and reminiscence process: social and clinical implications. Chichester: John Wiley; 1986.
30. Strauss A, Corbin J. Qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and technique. London: Sage Publications; 1990.
31. Morrow VM. "Dirty looks" and "trampy places" in young people's accounts of community and neighbourhood: implications for health inequalities. Critical Public Health 2000; 10(2):141-152.