Innovation or regulation: IDEAL opportunity for consensus

The Lancet

Volumn 376, Issue 9746, 2010, Pages 1034-1036

  McCulloch, Peter ^a   Schuller, Frank ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b TRINITY COLLEGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DRUG;

ADVERSE OUTCOME; CONSENSUS; CORONARY STENT; EVALUATION; GASTRIC BANDING; HUMAN; INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE; JOINT PROSTHESIS; NOTE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGULATORY MECHANISM; SAFETY; DEVICES; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; MASS COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROCEDURES; PROSTHESES AND ORTHOSES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); STANDARDS; SURGERY;

BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; CONSENSUS; DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; HUMANS; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, OPERATIVE;

EID: 77957202232     PISSN: 01406736     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61386-4     Document Type: Note

References (5)

1. C Wang, B Hefflin, JU Cope Emergency department visits for medical device-associated adverse events among children Pediatrics 126 2010 247 259
2. JS Barkun, JK Aronson, LS Feldman, GJ Maddern, SM Strasberg for the Balliol Collaboration Evaluation and stages of surgical innovations Lancet 374 2009 1089 1096
3. PL Ergina, JA Cook, JM Blazeby for the Balliol Collaboration Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation Lancet 374 2009 1097 1104
4. P McCulloch, DG Altman, WB Campbell for the Balliol Collaboration No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations Lancet 374 2009 1105 1112
5. RA Hill, A Boland, R Dickson Drug-eluting stents: a systematic review and economic evaluation Health Technol Assess 11 2007 iii xi-221.