Reference standards and reference multipliers for the comparison of the citation impact of papers published in different time periods

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 61, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 2061-2069

  Marx, Werner ^a   Bornmann, Lutz ^b   Cardona, Manuel ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUT FÜR FESTKÖRPERFORSCHUNG   (Germany)

^b ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALBERT EINSTEIN; BIBLIOMETRY; CITATION IMPACT; EARLY 20; H INDICES; MAX PLANCK; REFERENCE STANDARD; TIME-PERIODS;

PAPER;

STANDARDIZATION;

EID: 77957193351     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: 15322890     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.21377     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Abt, H.A. (1987). Reference frequencies in astronomy and related sciences. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 99(622), 1329-1332.
2. Abt, H.A. (1995). Some statistical highlights of the Astrophysical Journal. Astrophysical Journal, 455 (part 1), 407-411.
3. Bornmann, L.,&Daniel, H.-D. (2007). What do we know about the h index? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(9), 1381-1385.
4. Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H.-D. (2008). What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior. Journal of Documentation, 64(1), 45-80.
5. Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H.-D. (2009a). The state of h index research. Is the h index the ideal way to measure research performance? EMBO Reports, 10(1), 2-6.
6. o at the micro level using data from chemistry. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(8), 1664-1670.
7. Cardona, M.,&Marx,W. (2008).Max Planck -Aconservative revolutionary. Il Nuovo Saggiatore, 24(5-6), 39-54.
8. De Solla Price, D.J. (1965). Little science, big science. New York: Columbia University Press.
9. De Visscher, A. (2010). An index to measure a scientist's specific impact. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(2), 319-328.
10. Dickson, P. (2007). Sputnik: The shock of the century. New York: Walker & Co.
11. Einstein, A. (1905). Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Körper [On the electrodynamics of moving bodies]. Annalen der Physik, 17(5), 891-921.
12. Einstein, A. (1915). Über die allgemeine Relativitätstheorie (plus addendum). Erklärung der Perihelbewegung des Merkur aus der allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie. Die Feldgleichungen der Gravitation [On the general theory of relativity (addendum). Explanation of the perihelion motion of Mercury from the general theory of relativity. The field equations of gravitation]. Sitzungsberichte der Königlich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften Part 2, 778-847.
13. Einstein,A. (1916). Die Grundlage derAllgemeinen Relativitä tstheorie. [The foundation of the general theory of relativity]. Annalen der Physik, 49(7), 769-822.
14. Garfield, E. (1979). Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool? Scientometrics, 1(4), 359-375.
15. Garfield, E. (1998). Random thoughts on citationology. Its theory and practice. Scientometrics, 43(1), 69-76.
16. Gingras, Y., & Wallace, M. (2010). Why it has become more difficult to predict Nobel Prize winners: A bibliometric analysis of nominees and winners of the chemistry and physics prizes (1901-2007). Scientometrics, 82(2), 401-412.
17. Hirsch, J.E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 102(46), 16569-16572.
18. Legros, M., Elliott, B.R., Rittner, M.N., Weertman, J.R., & Hemker, K.J. (2000). Microsample tensile testing of nanocrystalline metals. Philosophical Magazine A, 80(4), 1017-1026.
19. Marx, W., & Schier, H. (2005). CAS kontra Google [CAS versus Google]. Nachrichten aus der Chemie, 53(12), 1228-1232.
20. Opthof,T.,&Leydesdorff, L. (in press). Caveats for the journal and field normalizations in theCWTS("Leiden") evaluations of research performance. Journal of Informetrics.
21. Radicchi, F., Fortunato, S., & Castellano, C. (2008). Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(45), 17268-17272.
22. Redner, S. (2005). Citation statistics from 110 years of Physical Review. Physics Today, 58(6), 49-54.
23. Rutherford, E. (1900). A radio-active substance emitted from thorium compounds. Philosophical Magazine, 49(296-01), 1-14.
24. Rutherford, E. (1911). The scattering of a and β particles by matter and the structure of the atom. Philosophical Magazine, 6(21), 669-688.
25. Schlegel, D.J., Finkbeiner, D.P., & Davis, M. (1998). Maps of dust infrared emission for use in estimation of reddening and cosmic microwave background radiation foregrounds. Astrophysical Journal, 500(2), 525-553.
26. Seglen, P.O. (1992). The skewness of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43(9), 628-638.
27. van Raan, A.F.J. (2004). Sleeping beauties in science. Scientometrics, 59(3), 467-472.
28. van Raan, A.F.J. (2004). Measuring science. Capita selecta of current main issues. In H.F. Moed, W. Glänzel, & U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research. The use of publication and patent statistics in studies of S&T systems (pp. 19-50). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
29. Witten, E. (1981). Dynamical breaking of supersymmetry. Nuclear Physics B, 188(3), 513-554.