Nonvisual motor learning improves visual motion perception: Evidence from violating the two-thirds power law

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 104, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 1612-1624

  Beets, I A M ^a   Rosler F ^a   Fiehler, K ^a  

^a PHILIPPS UNIVERSITY MARBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEARNING; MALE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE; VELOCITY; VISION; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; MOVEMENT; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77957189618     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: 15221598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00974.2009     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Abend W, Bizzi E, Morasso P. Human arm trajectory formation. Brain 105: 331-348, 1982.
2. Bidet-Ildei C, Orliaguet JP, Sokolov AN, Pavlova M. Perception of elliptic biological motion. Perception 35: 1137-1147, 2006.
3. Brown LE, Wilson ET, Goodale MA, Gribble PL. Motor force field learning influences visual processing of target motion. J Neurosci 27: 9975-9983, 2007.
4. Calvo-Merino B, Glaser DE, Grèzes J, Passingham RE, Haggard P. Action observation and acquired motor skills: an FMRI study with expert dancers. Cereb Cortex 15: 1243-1249, 2005. (Pubitemid 41373616)
5. Calvo-Merino B, Grèzes J, Glaser DE, Passingham RE, Haggard P. Seeing or doing? Influence of visual and motor familiarity in action observation. Curr Biol 16: 1905-1910, 2006.
6. Casile A, Dayan E, Caggiano V, Hendler T, Flash T, Giese MA. Neuronal encoding of human kinematic invariants during action observation. Cereb Cortex, 20: 1647-1655, 2010.
7. Casile A, Giese MA. Nonvisual motor training influences biological motion perception. Curr Biol 16: 69-74, 2006. (Pubitemid 43049888)
8. Cavanagh P. Attention-based motion perception. Science 257: 1563-1565, 1992.
9. Culham JC, Cavanagh P. Motion capture of luminance stimuli by equiluminous color gratings and by attentive tracking. Vision Res 34: 2701-2706, 1994. (Pubitemid 24289872)
10. Dayan E, Casile A, Levit-Binnun N, Giese MA, Hendler T, Flash T. Neural representations of kinematic laws of motion: evidence for action-perception coupling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 20582-20587, 2007.
11. de'Sperati C, Viviani P. The relationship between curvature and velocity in two-dimensional smooth pursuit eye movements. J Neurosci 17: 3932-3945, 1997. (Pubitemid 27200615)
12. di Pellegrino G, Fadiga L, Fogassi L, Gallese V, Rizzolatti G. Understanding motor events: a neurophysiological study. Exp Brain Res 91: 176-180, 1992.
13. Engel A, Burke M, Fiehler K, Bien S, Rösler F. Motor learning affects visual movement perception. Eur J Neurosci 27: 2294-2302, 2008. (Pubitemid 351590909)
14. Flach R, Knoblich G, Prinz W. The two-thirds power law in motion perception: when do motor anticipations come into play? Visual Cogn 11: 461-481, 2004.
15. Gallese V, Fadiga L, Fogassi L, Rizzolatti G. Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain 119: 593-609, 1996.
16. Giese MA, Poggio T. Neural mechanisms for the recognition of biological movements. Nat Rev Neurosci 4: 179-112, 2003. (Pubitemid 37280183)
17. Gribble PL, Ostry DJ. Origins of the power law relation between movement velocity and curvature: modeling the effects of muscle mechanics and limb dynamics. J Neurophysiol 76: 2853-2860, 1996.
18. Haken H, Kelso JA, Bunz HA. theoretical model of phase transitions in human hand movements. Biol Cybern 51: 347-356, 1985. (Pubitemid 15135510)
19. Harris CM, Wolpert DM. Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning. Nature 394: 780-784, 1998.
20. Hecht H, Vogt S, Prinz W. Motor learning enhances perceptual judgment: a case for action-perception transfer. Psychol Res 65: 3-14, 2001. (Pubitemid 33595047)
21. Hodges NJ, Franks IM. Attention focusing instructions and coordination bias: implications for learning a novel bimanual task. Hum Mov Sci 19: 843-867, 2000.
22. Hodges NJ, Franks IM. Learning as a function of coordination bias: building upon pre-practice behaviours. Hum Mov Sci 21: 231-258, 2002.
23. Hommel B, Müsseler J, Aschersleben G, Prinz W. The theory of event coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. Behav Brain Sci 24: 849-878; discussion 878-937, 2001. (Pubitemid 34965924)
24. Jeannerod M. The representing brain: neural correlates of motor intention and imagery. Behav Brain Sci 17: 187-245, 1994.
25. Jeannerod M. Neural simulation of action: a unifying mechanism for motor cognition. Neuroimage 14: S103-109, 2001.
26. Jordan K, Challis JH, Cusumano JP, Newell KM. Stability and the time-dependent structure of gait variability in walking and running. Hum Mov Sci 28: 113-128, 2009.
27. Lacquaniti F, Terzuolo C, Viviani P. The law relating the kinematic and figural aspects of drawing movements. Acta Psychol 54: 115-130, 1983.
28. Macmillan N, Creelman C. Detection Theory: A User's Guide (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2005.
29. McCullagh P, Weiss MR, Ross D. Modeling considerations in motor skill acquisition and performance: an integrated approach. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 17: 475-513, 1989.
30. Pollick FE, Sapiro G. Constant affine velocity predicts the 1/3 power law of planar motion perception and generation. Vision Res 37: 347-353, 1997. (Pubitemid 27032665)
31. Prinz W. Perception and action planning. Eur J Cogn Psychol 9: 129-154, 1997.
32. Reithler J, van Mier HI, Peters JC, Goebel R. Nonvisual motor learning influences abstract action observation. Curr Biol 17: 1201-1207, 2007. (Pubitemid 47043432)
33. Repp BH, Knoblich G. Action can affect auditory perception. Psychol Sci 18: 6-7, 2007.
34. Rizzolatti G, Fogassi L, Gallese V. Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nat Rev Neurosci 2: 661-670, 2001. (Pubitemid 33674057)
35. Schaal S, Sternad D. Origins and violations of the 2/3 power law in rhythmic three-dimensional arm movements. Exp Brain Res 136: 60-72, 2001. (Pubitemid 32201987)
36. Schütz-Bosbach S, Prinz W. Perceptual resonance: action-induced modulation of perception. Trends Cogn Sci 11: 349-355, 2007. (Pubitemid 47077912)
37. Siengsukon CF, Boyd LA. Does sleep promote motor learning? Implications for physical rehabilitation. Phys Ther 89: 370-383, 2009.
38. Swets JA, Pickett RM. Evaluation of Diagnostic Systems. Methods From Signal Detection Theory. Series in Cognition and Perception. New York: Academic, 1982.
39. Tanner WP, Swets JA. A decision-making theory of visual detection. Psychol Rev 61: 401-409, 1954.
40. Todorov E, Jordan MI. Smoothness maximization along a predefined path accurately predicts the speed profiles of complex arm movements. J Neurophysiol 80: 696-714, 1998. (Pubitemid 28387653)
41. Viviani P. Common Mechanisms in Perception and Action. Attention and Performance XIX. New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 2002.
42. Viviani P, Baud-Bovy G, Redolfi M. Perceiving and tracking kinesthetic stimuli: further evidence of motor-perceptual interactions. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 23: 1232-1252, 1997. (Pubitemid 127458911)
43. Viviani P, Campadelli P, Mounoud P. Visuo-manual pursuit tracking of human two-dimensional two-dimensional movements. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 13: 62-78, 1987.
44. Viviani P, Flash T. Minimum-jerk, two-thirds power law, and isochrony: converging approaches to movement planning. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 21: 32-53, 1995.
45. Viviani P, McCollum G. The relation between linear extent and velocity in drawing movements. Neuroscience 10: 211-218, 1983. (Pubitemid 13004453)
46. Viviani P, Mounoud P. Perceptuomotor compatibility in pursuit tracking of two-dimensional movements. J Mot Behav 22: 407-443, 1990. (Pubitemid 20329761)
47. Viviani P, Schneider R. A developmental study of the relationship between geometry and kinematics in drawing movements. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 17: 198-218, 1991.
48. Viviani P, Stucchi N. The effect of movement velocity on form perception: geometric illusions in dynamic displays. Percept Psychophys 46: 266-274, 1989. (Pubitemid 19204535)
49. Viviani P, Stucchi N. Biological movements look uniform: evidence of motor-perceptual interactions. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 18: 603-623, 1992.
50. Wann J, Nimmo-Smith I, Wing AM. Relation between velocity and curvature in movement: equivalence and divergence between a power law and a minimum-jerk model. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 14: 622-637, 1988.
51. Werkhoven P, Sperling G, Chubb C. The dimensionality of texture-defined motion: a single channel theory. Vision Res 33: 463-485, 1993. (Pubitemid 23088703)
52. Werkhoven P, Sperling G, Chubb C. Perception of apparent motion between dissimilar gratings: spatiotemporal properties. Vision Res 34: 2741-2759, 1994. (Pubitemid 24289876)
53. Winter DA. Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement (2nd ed.). Waterloo Canada: Wiley-Interscience, 1990.
54. Wohlschläger A. Visual motion priming by invisible actions. Vision Res 40: 925-930, 2000. (Pubitemid 30136078)
55. Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z. Computational principles of movement neuroscience. Nat Neurosci 3, Suppl: 1212-1217, 2000.
56. Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z, Jordan MI. Are arm trajectories planned in kinematic or dynamic coordinates? An adaptation study. Exp Brain Res 103: 460-470, 1995.
57. Zanone PG, Kelso JA. Evolution of behavioral attractors with learning: nonequilibrium phase transitions. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 18: 403-421, 1992.
58. Zanone PG, Kelso JA. Coordination dynamics of learning and transfer: collective and component levels. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 23: 1454-1480, 1997.