An analytical map of social scientific approaches to the concept of law

Oxford Journal of Legal Studies

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 1995, Pages 501-535

  Tamanaha, Brian Z ^a  

^a St John's Law School   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77957188008     PISSN: 01436503     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ojls/15.4.501     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. H. L. A. Hart, The Concept of Law (1961).
2. S. F. Moore, Law as Process (1978) at 215.
3. J. Comaroff and S. Roberts, Rula and Processes (1981) at 4.
4. L Hamnett, Social Anthropology and Law (1977) at 4.
5. L. Mair, Primitive Government (1962) at 19.
6. L. Nader, ‘The Anthropological Study of Law’, 67 American Anthropologist 3 at 5 (1965).
7. A. Hoebel, The Law of Primitive Man (1954) at 18.
8. R. Abel, ‘A Comparative Theory of Dispute Institutions in Society’, 7 Law & Society Rev 217 at 224 (1974).
9. K. Ziegert, ‘The Sociology Behind Eugen Ehrlich’s Sociology of Law’, 7 International J Sociology of Law 225 at 235 (1979)
10. R. Simon and J. Lynch, ‘The Sociology of Law: Where We Have Been and Where We Might be Going’, 23 Law & Society Rev 825 at 849 (1989)
11. F. Snyder, ‘Anthropology, Dispute Processes and Law: A Critical Introduction’, 8 JL & Society 141 at 163 (1981)
12. L. Friedman, ‘The Law and Society Movement’, 38 Stanford LR 773 (1986).
13. B. Tamanaha, ‘The Folly of the “Social Scientific” Concept of Legal Pluralism’, 20 JL & Society 192 at 194-9 (1993).
14. K. Ziegert, ‘A Sociologist’s View’ in E. Kamenka and A. Erh-Soon Tay (eds), Law and Social Control (1980) at 76.
15. E. Schur, Law and Society: A Sociological View (1968) at 37.
16. L. Poipisil, Anthropology of Law: A Comparative Theory (1971) at 28-31.
17. E. Ehrlich, The Fundamental Principles of the Sociology of Low (1975) at 24.
18. B. Malinowski, Crime and Custom in Savage Society (1926) at 14.
19. F. Cohen, The Legal Conscience (1960) at 187.
20. I. Schapera, ‘Malinowiki’s Theories of Law’ in R. Firth (ed), Man and Culture: An Evaluation of the Work of Malinowski. Edited by R. Firth (1957) 139 at 153.
21. R. Pound, Jurisprudence (Vol I 1959) at 312-20
22. I. Hamnett, Chieftanship and Legitimacy (1975) at 14.
23. M. Galanter, ‘Justice in Many Rooms: Courts, Private Ordering, and Indigenous Law’, 19 J of Legal Pluralism 1 at 17-18 (1981).
24. J. Griffiths, ‘What is Legal Pluralism?’ 24 J of Legal Pluralism 1 at 38 (1986).
25. S. E. Merry, ‘Legal Pluralism’, 22 Law & Society Rev 869 at 870 (1988).
26. M. Feeley, ‘The Concept of Laws in Social Science: A Critique and Expanded View’, 10 Law & Society Rev 497 at 498 (1976).
27. M. Rheinstein, Max Weber on Low in Economy and Society (1954) at 13.
28. A. Kronman, Max Weber (1983) at 189-93.
29. P. Bohannan, ‘The Differing Realms of the Law” in P. Bohannan (ed), Law and Warfare (1967) 43 at 47.
30. P. H. Gulliver, ‘Negotiations as a Mode of Dispute Settlement: Towards a General Model’, 7 Law & Society Rev 683 (1973).
31. J. Gibbs, ‘Law as a Means of Social Control’ in J. Gibbs (ed), Social Control: Views from the Social Sciences (1982) 83 at 95.
32. S. Roberts, Order and Dispute: An Introduction to Legal Anthropology (1979) at 198.
33. R. Pound, Social Control Through Low (1942) at 25.
34. D. Black, ‘The Boundaries of Legal Sociology’, 81 Yale LJ 1086 at 1092 (1972).
35. D. Black, The Behavior of Law (1976) at 2.
36. D. Black, ‘Social Control as a Dependent Variable’ in D. Black (ed), Toward a General Theory cf Social Control (Vol 1, 1984) 1 at 2.
37. P. Selznick, Law, Society and Industrial Justice (New York 1969) at 7.
38. P. Selznick, ‘The Sociology of Law’, 9 International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences 51 (1968).
39. R. Cotterrell, The Sociology of Law (1984) at 45-6.
40. D. Hiley, J. Bohman, and R. Shusterman (eds), The Interpretive Turn: Philosophy, Scienct, Culture (1991).
41. B. Tamanaha, Understanding Low in Micronesia: An Interpretive Approach to Thansplanted Low (1993).
42. R. Abel, ‘Law Books and Books About Law’, 26 Stanford LR 175 at 189 (1976).
43. M. King, ‘The Truth About Autopoiesis’, 20 JL & Society 218 at 226 (1993).
44. B. Malinowski, ‘A New Instrument for the Interpretation of Law—Especially Primitive’, 51 Yale LJ 1237 (1942)
45. E. Ehrlich, ‘The Sociology of Law’, 36 Harvard LR 130 (1922).
46. B. Malinowski, ‘Introduction’, in Hogbin, Law and Order in Polynesia (1934) at lxiii.
47. B. Malinowiki, A Scientific Theory of Culture (1944).
48. R. K. Merton, Social Theory and Social Structure’ (1968) at 84-6.
49. C. Hempel, ‘The Logic of Functional Analysis’ in C. Hempel, Aspects of Scientific Explanation (1965) 297.
50. T. Parions, ‘The Law and Social Control’ in W. Evan (ed) The Sociology of Law (1980) 60.
51. N. Luhmann, A Sociological Theory of Law (1985).
52. P. Wilkinson, ‘The Potential of Functionalism for the Sociological Analysis of Law’ in A. Podgorecki and C. Whelan, Sociological Approaches to Law (1981) 67.
53. Holmes, ‘Path of the Law’, 10 Harvard LR 457 at 461 (1897).
54. K. Llewellyn, The Bramble Bush (1930).
55. Webster’s Third New International Dictionary of the English Language Unabridged (1981).
56. M. Janowitz, ‘The Intellectual History of “Social Control”’ in J. S. Rouek (ed) Social Control for the 1980’s (1978) 20 at 30.
57. L. Nader and B. Yngvesion, ‘On Studying the Ethnography of Law and its Consequences’ in J. Honingmann (ed) Handbook on Social and Cultural Anthropology (1973) 883 at 908-9
58. A. Horwitz, The Logic of Social Control (1990) 1.
59. A. Hunt, ‘Dichotomy and Contradiction in the Sociology of Law’ in A. Hunt, Explorations in Law and Society (1993) at 58-89.
60. V. Turner, Dramas, Fields, and Metaphors: Symbolic Action in Human Society (1974) at 37–41.
61. K. Llewellyn, Jurisprudence (1962) at 401-2.
62. A. Watson, Legal Transplants: An Approach to Comparative Law (1974).
63. S. Macauley, ‘Non-Contractual Relations in Business: A Preliminary Study” 28 Am Sociological Rev 55 (1963).
64. D. Trubek and M. Galanter, ‘Scholars in Self-Estrangement: Some Reflections on the Crisis in Law and Development Studies in the United States’, 1974 Wisconsin LR 1062 (1974).
65. R. Seidman, ‘The Communication of Law and the Process of Development’, 1972 Wisconsin LR 686 (1972).
66. J. Raz, The Authority of Law (1979) 85-90.
67. T. Grey, ‘Holmes and Legal Pragmatism’ 41 Stanford LR 787, 831 (1989).
68. Posner, The Problems of Jurisprudence (1990) at 213-14.
69. Lon Fuller’s The Morality of Law (1964)