The grant of an absolute discharge

Oxford Journal of Legal Studies

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 1985, Pages 211-237

  Wasik, Martin ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77957186713     PISSN: 01436503     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ojls/5.2.211     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. McWilliams, ‘Sentencing: the need for absolute and conditional discharge’ 8 CLQ 52 (1965).
2. Common and Mewett, ‘The philosophy of sentencing and disparity of sentences’ 7 Ont Mag Q 7 (1970), commenting that the use of the adjournment in such cases is ‘manifestly improper’.
3. Ross, On Guilt, Responsibility and Punishment (1975) 24-27.
4. Swabey, ‘Absolute and conditional discharge under the Criminal Code’ CRNS 132 (1972)
5. Greenspan, ‘Absolute and conditional discharge’ in Canadian Bar Association, Studies in Criminal Law and Procedure (1973) 76
6. Bobiasz, ‘Absolute and conditional discharge' 6 Ottawa Law Rev 608 (1974).
7. Canadian Committee on Corrections, Towards Unity: Criminal Justice and Corrections (1969).
8. A Damaska, ‘Adverse legal consequences of conviction and their removal—a comparative survey’ JCL Cr & PS 374, 542 (1968)
9. Martin and Webster, The Social Consequences of Conviction (1971)
10. Gardiner Report, Living it Down: the Problem of old Convictions (1972)
11. A Leon, ‘Post-sentencing problems: some consequences of a finding of guilt in criminal cases’ 22 CLQ 318 (1978)
12. Walker, Punishment, Danger and Stigma (1980) Chap 7.
13. Walker (1980) 150-152.
14. Samuels, ‘The Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974' 8 AALR 60 (1979).
15. Ashworth, Sentencing and Penal Policy (1983) Chap IV.
16. McBamett, Conviction (1981) 145.
17. Leon, ‘Drug offences and discharges in Cananda: the need for reform’ 35 Univ. of Toronto Fac. of Law Rev. 38(1977).
18. De Smith, Judical Review of Administrative Action (4th ed 1980) 311
19. Wagik, ‘Sentencing and the Divisional Court’ [1984] Crim LR 272.
20. Galligan, ‘The nature and function of policies within discretionary powers’ PL 332 (1976)
21. Paulus, ‘Strict Liability: its place in public welfare offences’ 20 CLQ 445 (1978)
22. Thomas, Principles of Sentencing (2nd ed 1979) 366—372
23. Wasik, ‘Excuses at the sentencing stage’[1983] Crim LR 450.
24. A Ashworth, Sentencing and Penal Policy (1983) 445, calling for ‘a body which is able to consider prosecution policy in relation to these wider issues of sentencing and penal policy’.
25. A Wilcox, ‘The proposed prosecution process’ [1981] Crim LR 482 and the White Paper, An Independent Protecution Service for England and Walet (Cmnd 9074 1983).
26. Moody and Tombs, Protecution in the Public Interest (1982) Chap 4.
27. Wilkins, ‘Absolute and conditional discharge’ 18 CLQ 454, 469 (1976).
28. Newman, Conviction—The Determination of Guilt or Innocence without Trial (1966) 175 et seq.
29. Williams, ‘Prosecution, discretion and the accountability of the police’ in Hood (ed), Crime, Criminology and Public Policy (1974) 162, 174-177
30. A Thomas (1979) 211-215.
31. Culley(1977) CCC (2d) 433
32. Hill-Tout (1981) 2 WWR 91
33. Cross, The English Sentencing System (3rd ed 1981) 10-12.
34. Cross, The English Sentencing System (2nd ed 1975) 9.
35. Wasik, ‘Excuses at the sentencing stage' [1983] Crim LR 450.
36. Samuels,‘No order on sentence’(1980) 144 JPN 154.