Time-dependent second-order Born calculations for model atoms and molecules in strong laser fields

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 82, Issue 3, 2010, Pages

  Balzer, K ^a   Bauch, S ^a   Bonitz, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KIEL   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DINGER EQUATION; DISCRETE VARIABLE REPRESENTATION; DISTRIBUTED MEMORY; ELECTRON DENSITIES; ELECTRON-ELECTRON CORRELATION; FINITE-ELEMENT; HELIUM ATOM; HETERONUCLEAR MOLECULES; LASER FIELDS; LITHIUM HYDRIDES; NON EQUILIBRIUM; NON-EQUILIBRIUM GREEN'S FUNCTION; SCALABLE ALGORITHMS; SECOND BORN APPROXIMATION; SECOND ORDERS; STRONG LASER FIELD; TIME DOMAIN; TIME-DEPENDENT; TIME-DEPENDENT HARTREE-FOCK; UV- AND;

BORN APPROXIMATION; ELECTRON CORRELATIONS; ELECTRON DENSITY MEASUREMENT; GREEN'S FUNCTION; HELIUM; LITHIUM;

HARTREE APPROXIMATION;

EID: 77957164524     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: 10941622     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.82.033427     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. G. Tanner, K. Richter, and J.-M. Rost, Rev. Mod. Phys. RMPHAT 0034-6861 10.1103/RevModPhys.72.497 72, 497 (2000).
2. F. Krausz and M. Ivanov, Rev. Mod. Phys. RMPHAT 0034-6861 10.1103/RevModPhys.81.163 81, 163 (2009).
3. J. Itatani, F. Quéré, G. L. Yudin, M. Y. Ivanov, F. Krausz, and P. B. Corkum, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88. 173903 88, 173903 (2002).
4. M. Uiberacker, Nature (London) NATUAS 0028-0836 10.1038/nature05648 446, 627 (2007).
5. S. Bauch, K. Balzer, and M. Bonitz, accepted for publication in Europhys. Lett., e-print arXiv: 1005.1253.
6. P. C. Martin and J. Schwinger, Phys. Rev. PHRVAO 0031-899X 10.1103/PhysRev.115.1342 115, 1342 (1959).
7. L. V. Keldysh, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 47, 1515 (1964)
8. L. V. Keldysh, [Sov. Phys. JETP 20, 1018 (1965)].
9. L. P. Kadanoff and G. Baym, Quantum Statistical Mechanics (Benjamin, New York, 1962).
10. D. Bauer, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.56.3028 56, 3028 (1997).
11. M. Ruggenthaler and D. Bauer, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.233001 102, 233001 (2009);
12. M. Ruggenthaler and D. Bauer, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.80.052502 80, 052502 (2009).
13. J. Zanghellini, M. Kitzler, T. Brabec, and A. Scrinzi, J. Phys. B JPAPEH 0953-4075 10.1088/0953-4075/37/4/004 37, 763 (2004).
14. D. Hochstuhl, S. Bauch, and M. Bonitz, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. JPAPEH 1742-6588 10.1088/1742-6596/220/1/012019 220, 012019 (2010).
15. R. van Leeuwen, N. E. Dahlen, and A. Stan, Phys. Rev. B JPAPEH 1098-0121 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.195105 74, 195105 (2006).
16. K. Balzer, S. Bauch, and M. Bonitz, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.81.022510 81, 022510 (2010).
17. M. S. Pindzola, D. C. Griffin, and C. Bottcher, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.66.2305 66, 2305 (1991).
18. R. Grobe and J. H. Eberly, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.48.4664 48, 4664 (1993);
19. S. L. Haan, R. Grobe, and J. H. Eberly, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.50.378 50, 378 (1994).
20. W.-C. Liu, J. H. Eberly, S. L. Haan, and R. Grobe, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.520 83, 520 (1999).
21. N. E. Dahlen and R. van Leeuwen, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.64.023405 64, 023405 (2001).
22. M. Lein, E. K. U. Gross, and V. Engel, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.4707 85, 4707 (2000).
23. D. G. Tempel, T. J. Martínez, and N. T. Maitra, J. Chem. Theor. Comput. 1549-9618 10.1021/ct800535c 5, 770 (2009).
24. K. Balzer, S. Bauch, and M. Bonitz, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. PRLTAO 1742-6588 10.1088/1742-6596/220/1/012020 220, 012020 (2010).
25. T. N. Rescigno and C. W. McCurdy, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.62.032706 62, 032706 (2000).
26. With the term GGL orthonormal we refer to the FE-DVR basis being orthonormal with respect to the GGL quadrature rule.
27. N. E. Dahlen and R. van Leeuwen, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.153004 98, 153004 (2007).
28. A. Stan, N. E. Dahlen, and R. van Leeuwen, J. Chem. Phys. JCPSA6 0021-9606 10.1063/1.3127247 130, 224101 (2009).
29. A run of tf = 50 (a.u.) with typical resolution δt = 0. 02 and nb = 100 FE-DVR basis functions comprises 1 terabyte of memory solely for G (xt, x′ t′).
30. A similar concept has been developed independently by M.Garny and M. M. Müller, High Performance Computing in Science and Engineering, Garching/Munich 2009 (Springer, Berlin, 2010).
31. W. Gropp, E. Lusk, and A. Skjellum, Using MPI: Portable Parallel Programming with the Message-Passing Interface (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1999).
32. T p measures the total CPU time for a MPI run including p processes.
33. All batch system details refer to the North German Super Computer Alliance (HLRN).
34. We note that the initial state was taken on the Hartree-Fock level (cf. Fig. 5); thus, it is not self-consistent. However, we expect this to have only minor effects on the considered dipole transitions.
35. V. A. Mandelshtam and H. S. Taylor, J. Chem. Phys. JCPSA6 0021-9606 10.1063/1.475324 107, 6756 (1997).
36. S. L. Marple, Digital Spectral Analysis with Applications (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1987).