Campus perspective on the national institutes of health public access policy: University of california, san francisco, library experience

Journal of the Medical Library Association

Volumn 98, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 256-259

  Banks, Marcus A ^a   Persily, Gail L ^b  

^a Manager of Education and Research Services   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ECONOMICS; HUMAN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INTERNET; LEGAL ASPECT; LIBRARIAN; LIBRARY; MEDLINE; METHODOLOGY; NATIONAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; POLICY; PUBLISHING; UNITED STATES;

HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INTERNET; LIBRARIANS; LIBRARIES, MEDICAL; NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (U.S.); ORGANIZATIONAL POLICY; PUBLISHING; PUBMED; SAN FRANCISCO; UNITED STATES;

EID: 77957141347     PISSN: 15365050     EISSN: 15589439     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3163/1536-5050.98.3.015     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. National Institutes of HealthPublic access policy [Internet]. Bethesda, MD: The Institutes; 2009 [cited 4 Sep 2009]. http://publicaccess.nih.gov>.
2. PubMed Central, National Center for Biotechnology Information. PMC overview [Internet]. Bethesda, MD: The Center; 2008 [cited 4 Sep 2009]. .
3. Suber P. An open access mandate for the NIH. SPARC Open Access Newsletter [Internet] 2008 2 Jan;117 [cited 4 Sep 2009]. .
4. Suber P. Bethesda statement on open access publishing [Internet]. Suber; 20 Jun 2003 [cited 4 Sep 2009].
5. Washington DC Principles for Free Access to Science. Coalition members comment on request for information: NIH public access policy NOT-OD-08-060 (March 28, 2008) [Internet]. Washington, DC: The Principles; 2008 [cited 4 Sep 2009].
6. Bernard Becker Medical Library. NIH public access policy [Internet]. St. Louis, MO: The Library; 27 Aug 2009 [cited 4 Sep 2009].
7. Kroth PJ, Aspinall EE, Phillips HE. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) policy on enhancing public access: tracking institutional compliance rates. J Med Libr Assoc. 2006 Jul;94(3):279-283. (Available from: . [cited 26 Feb 2010].)
8. Barnett MC, Keener MW. Expanding medical library support in response to the National Institutes of Health Public Access Policy. J Med Libr Assoc. 2007 Oct;95(4): 450-453. DOI: 10.3163/1536-5050.95.4.450. (Available from: . [cited 26 Feb 2010].)
9. Stimson NF. National Institutes of Health public access policy assistance: one library's approach [comment and opinion]. J Med Libr Assoc. 2009 Oct;97(4):238-240. DOI:10.3163/1536-5050.97.4.002. (Available from: . [cited 26 Feb 2010].)
10. University of California, San Francisco, Library and Center for Knowledge Management. Public access to NIHfunded research [Internet]. San Francisco, CA: The Library; 2009 [cited 4 Sep 2009].
11. Wiley-Blackwell. Wiley InterScience: about us: online open [Internet]. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009 [cited 4 Sep 2009].
12. Swan L, Chan L. Open access scholarly information sourcebook: citation impact [Internet]. Washington, DC: Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resource Coalition; 2009 [cited 25 Sep 2009].
13. Hitchcock S. The effect of open access and downloads ('hits') on citation impact: a bibliography of studies [Internet]. Southampton, UK: OpCit Project; 2009 [cited 25 Sep 2009].
14. Jensen LJ, Saric J, Bork P. Literature mining for the biologist: from information retrieval to biological discovery. Nat Rev Genet. 2006,Feb;7(2):119-129.
15. Bourne PE, Fink JL, Gerstein M. Open access: taking full advantage of the content. PLoS Comput Biol. 2008;4(3):e1000037. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000037.