The structural and content aspects of abstracts versus bodies of full text journal articles are different

BMC Bioinformatics

Volumn 11, Issue , 2010, Pages

  Cohen, K Bretonnel ^a,b   Johnson, Helen L ^a   Verspoor, Karin ^a   Roeder, Christophe ^a   Hunter, Lawrence E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL TEXT MININGS; DIFFERENT DENSITIES; JOURNAL ARTICLES; LINGUISTIC FEATURES; NAMED ENTITIES; PARADIGM SHIFTS; SEMANTIC FEATURES; STRUCTURAL DIFFERENCES;

DATA MINING; LINGUISTICS; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; SEMANTICS; TOOLS;

ABSTRACTING;

ARTICLE; DOCUMENTATION; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; MEDLINE; METHODOLOGY; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; NOMENCLATURE; PUBLICATION;

ABSTRACTING AND INDEXING AS TOPIC; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; MEDLINE; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; TERMINOLOGY AS TOPIC;

EID: 77957140630     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712105     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-492     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Verspoor K, Cohen KB, Hunter L. The textual characteristics of traditional and Open Access scientific journals are similar. BMC Bioinformatics 2009, 10:183. 10.1186/1471-2105-10-183, 2714574, 19527520.
2. Blaschke C, Valencia A. Can bibliographic pointers for known biological data be found automatically? Protein interactions as a case study. Comparative and Functional Genomics 2001, 2(4):196-206. 10.1002/cfg.91, 2447212, 18628915.
3. Shah PK, Perez-Iratxeta C, Bork P, Andrade MA. Information extraction from full text scientific articles: Where are the keywords?. BMC Bioinformatics 2003, 4(20). 166134, 12775220.
4. Corney DP, Buxton BF, Langdon WB, Jones DT. BioRAT: extracting biological information from full-length papers. Bioinformatics 2004, 20(17):3206-3213. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth386, 15231534.
5. Friedman C, Kra P, Yu H, Krauthammer M, Rzhetsky A. GENIES: a natural-language processing system for the extraction of molecular pathways from journal articles. Bioinformatics 2001, 17(Suppl 1):S74-S82.
6. Lin J. Is searching full text more effective than searching abstracts?. BMC Bioinformatics 2009, 10(46). 2695361, 19192280.
7. McIntosh T, Curran JR. Challenges for automatically extracting molecular interactions from full-text articles. BMC Bioinformatics 2009, 10(311). 2761905, 19778419.
8. Agarwal S, Yu H. Automatically classifying sentences in full-text biomedical articles into Introduction, Methods, Results and Discussion. Bioinformatics 2009, 25(23):3174-3180. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp548, 19783830.
9. Tanabe L, Wilbur WJ. Tagging gene and protein names in full text articles. Natural language processing in the biomedical domain 2002, 9-13.
10. Hersh W, Voorhees E. TREC genomics special issue overview. Information Retrieval 2008, 12:1.
11. Hirschman L, Yeh A, Blaschke C, Valencia A. Overview of BioCreAtIvE: critical assessment of information extraction for biology. BMC Bioinformatics 2005, 6:S1. 10.1186/1471-2105-6-S1-S1, 1869002, 15960821.
12. Krallinger M, Morgan A, Smith L, Leitner F, Tanabe L, Wilbur J, Hirschman L, Valencia A. The BioCreative II - critical assessment for information extraction in biology challenge. Genome Biology 2008, 9:S1. 10.1186/gb-2008-9-s2-s1, 2559980, 18834487.
13. Jurafsky D, Martin JH. Speech and language processing: An introduction to natural language processing, computational linguistics, and speech recognition 2008, Pearson Prentice Hall.
14. Nakov PI, Schwartz AS, Hearst MA. Citances: Citation sentences for semantic analysis of bioscience text. SIGIR'04 Workshop on Search and Discovery in Bioinformatics 2004,
15. Baumgartner WA, Lu Z, Johnson HL, Caporaso JG, Paquette J, Lindemann A, White EK, Medvedeva O, Cohen KB, Hunter L. Concept recognition for extracting protein interaction relations from biomedical text. Genome Biology 2008, 9:S2. 10.1186/gb-2008-9-s2-s9, 2559986, 18834493.
16. A design methodology for a biomedical literature indexing tool using the rhetoric of science. BioLINK 2004, Linking biological literature, ontologies and databases 77-84.
17. Elhadad N. User-sensitive text summarization: Application to the medical domain. PhD thesis 2006, Columbia University.
18. Chapman W, Bridewell W, Hanbury P, Cooper G, Buchanan B. Evaluation of negation phrases in narrative clinical reports. Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium 2001 2001, 105-109.
19. Chapman W, Bridewell W, Hanbury P, Cooper G, Buchanan B. A simple algorithm for identifying negated findings and diseases in discharge summaries. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 2001, 34:301-310. 10.1006/jbin.2001.1029, 12123149.
20. Goldin I, Chapman W. Learning to detect negation with 'not' in medical texts. Proceedings of the ACM SIGIR 2003,
21. Mutalik PG, Deshpande A, Nadkarni PM. Use of general-purpose negation detection to augment concept indexing of medical documents. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2001, 8:598-609. 130070, 11687566.
22. Gasperin C. Semi-supervised anaphora resolution in biomedical texts. Linking natural language processing and biology: towards deeper biological literature analysis 2006, 96-103. Association for Computational Linguistics.
23. Gasperin C, Karamanis N, Seal R. Annotation of anaphoric relations in biomedical full-text articles using a domain-relevant scheme. Proceedings of DAARC 2007 2007,
24. Szmrecsányi BM. On operationalizing syntactic complexity. JADT 2004: 7es Journées internationales d'Analyse statistique des Données Textuelles 2004, 1032-1039.
25. Leroy G, Helmreich S, Cowie JR, Miller T, Zheng W. Evaluating online health information: Beyond readability formulas. AMIA 2008 Symposium Proceedings 2008, 394-398.
26. Settles B. ABNER: an open source tool for automatically tagging genes, proteins, and other entity names in text. Bioinformatics 2005, 21(14):3191-3192. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti475, 15860559.
27. Leaman R, Gonzalez G. BANNER: An executable survey of advances in biomedical named entity recognition. Pac Symp Biocomput 2008,
28. Alias-i. LingPipe 3.1.2. 2008,
29. Caporaso JG, W AB, Randolph DA, Cohen KB, Hunter L. MutationFinder: A high-performance system for extracting point mutation mentions from text. Bioinformatics 2007, 23:1862-1865. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm235, 2516306, 17495998.
30. Klein D, Manning C. Accurate unlexicalized parsing. Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics 2003, 423-430.
31. Abney S, Flickenger S, Gdaniec C, Grishman C, Harrison P, Hindle D, Ingria R, Jelinek F, Klavans J, Liberman M, et al. Procedure for quantitatively comparing the syntactic coverage of English grammars. Proceedings of the workshop on Speech and Natural Language 1991, 306-311. Association for Computational Linguistics, Morristown, NJ, USA.