What makes a paper influential and frequently cited?

Journal of Management Studies

Volumn 47, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 1394-1404

  Starbuck, William H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77957127404     PISSN: 00222380     EISSN: 14676486     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00903.x     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Argote L. Organizational Learning. Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge 1999, Norwell, MA, Kluwer Academic Publishers
2. Barley S R. When I write my masterpiece: thoughts on what makes a paper interesting. Academy of Management Journal 2007, 49:16-20.
3. Boissiere M. Rationale for Public Investments in Primary Education in Developing Countries: Background Paper for the Evaluation of the World Bank's Support to Primary Education 2004, Washington, DC, World Bank
4. Cohen W M, Levinthal D A. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 1990, 35:128-52. Special Issue: Technology, Organizations, and Innovation
5. Cohen W M, Nelson R R, Walsh J P. Protecting Their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions and Why U.S. Manufacturing Firms Patent (or Not). 2000, NBER Working Paper No. 7552, February
6. Cornelissen J, Floyd S W. The future ahead: imagination, rigour and the advancement of management studies. Journal of Management Studies 2009, 46:10-5.
7. Davis M S. That's interesting! Towards a phenomenology of sociology and a sociology of phenomenology. Philosophy of Social Science 1971, 1:309-44.
8. Dreeben R. On What Is Learned in School 1968, Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley
9. Gans J S, Shepherd G B. How are the mighty fallen: rejected classic articles by leading economists. Journal of Economic Perspectives 1994, 8:165-79.
10. Kärreman D. The Power of Knowledge: Learning from "Learning by Knowledge-Intensive Firms" Journal of Management Studies 2010, 47:1405-16.
11. Laudon K, Starbuck W H. Organizational information and knowledge. International Encyclopedia of Business and Management 2001, 5045-57. Warner M, Ed., 2nd, edition, Vol. 6, London, Thompson Learning
12. Levin R C, Klevorick A K, Nelson R R, Winter S G, Gilbert R, Griliches Z. Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1987, 783-831. 1987, Special Issue on Microeconomics
13. Malhotra N, Morris T. Heterogeneity in professional service firms. Journal of Management Studies 2009, 46:895-922.
14. Markman G D, Siegel D S, Wright M. Research and technology commercialization. Journal of Management Studies 2008, 45:1401-23.
15. Nystrom P C, Starbuck W H. Organizational facades. 1984a, Academy of Management, Proceedings of the Annual Meeting, Boston, 182-5
16. Nystrom P C, Starbuck W H. To avoid organizational crises, unlearn. Organizational Dynamics 1984b, 12:53-65.
17. Payne R L, Pugh D S. Organizational structure and climate. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology 1976, 1125-73. Dunnette M D, Ed., Chicago, IL, Rand McNally
18. Rhenman E. Organization Theory for Long Range Planning 1973, London, Wiley
19. Schwab A, Starbuck W H. Null-hypothesis significance tests in behavioral and management research: we can do better. Research Methodology in Strategy and Management 2009, 29-54. Bergh D, Ketchen D. Eds, Vol. 5, Bingley, Emerald
20. Starbuck W H. A trip to view the elephants and rattlesnakes in the Garden of Aston. Perspectives on Organization Design and Behavior 1981, 167-98. Van de Ven A HJoyce W F. Eds, New York, Wiley-Interscience
21. Starbuck W H. Knowledge-intensive firms: learning to survive in strange environments. Kunskap Som Kritisk Resurs (Knowledge as a Critical Resource) 1990, 10-20. Lindmark L. Ed., Umeaa, University of Umeaa, Department of Business Administration
22. Starbuck W H. Strategizing in the real world. International Journal of Technology Management 1992, 8:77-85. Special Publication on Technological Foundations of Strategic Management
23. Starbuck W H. Keeping a butterfly and an elephant in a house of cards: the elements of exceptional success. Journal of Management Studies 1993, 30:885-921.
24. Starbuck W H. On behalf of naiveté. Evolutionary Dynamics of Organizations 1994, 205-20. Baum J A CSingh J V. Eds, New York, Oxford University Press
25. Starbuck W H. Turning lemons into lemonade: where is the value in peer reviews? Journal of Management Inquiry 2003, 12:344-51.
26. Starbuck W H. Preface: realistic perspectives on organizing and strategizing. Organizational Realities: Studies of Strategizing and Organizing 2006a, Oxford, Oxford University Press
27. Starbuck W H. The Production of Knowledge 2006b, Oxford, Oxford University Press
28. Starbuck W H, Greve A, Hedberg B L T. Responding to crises. Journal of Business Administration 1978, 9:111-37.
29. Sveiby K E, Risling A. Kunskapsföretaget - Seklets Viktigaste Ledarutmaning? (The Knowledge Firm - This Century's Most Important Managerial Challenge?) 1986, Malmö, Liber AB
30. Von Nordenflycht A. What is a professional service firm? Toward a theory and taxonomy of knowledge intensive firms. Academy of Management Review 2010, 35:155-74.
31. Winter S G. Knowledge and competence as strategic assets. The Competitive Challenge: Strategies for Industrial Innovation and Renewal 1987, 159-84. Teece D J. Ed., Cambridge, MA, Ballinger
32. Constructing Knowledge Societies: New Challenges for Tertiary Education 2002, World Bank, Washington, DC, World Bank