Negotiating GIS and social theory in population geography

Geography Compass

Volumn 4, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 616-629

  Walker, Kyle E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEMOGRAPHIC METHOD; GIS; HUMAN GEOGRAPHY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SOCIAL THEORY; SPATIAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 77957122234     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17498198     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00333.x     Document Type: Review

References (62)

1. Brown M, Knopp L. Places or Polygons? Governmentality, scale, and the Census in The Gay and Lesbian Atlas. Population, Space, and Place 2006, 12:223-242. pp
2. Brown M, Knopp L. Queering the map: The productive tensions of colliding epistemologies. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 2008, 98(1):40-58. pp
3. Caldas de Castro M. Spatial demography: An opportunity to improve policy making at diverse decision levels. Population Research & Policy Review 2007, 26:477-509. pp
4. Crampton J W. GIS and geographic governance: Reconstructing the choropleth map. Cartographica 2004, 39(1):41-53. pp
5. Delaney D, Leitner H. The political construction of scale. Political Geography 1997, 16(2):93-97. pp
6. Ellis M. Vital statistics. The Professional Geographer 2009, 61(3):301-309. pp
7. Elwood S. Beyond cooptation or resistance: Urban spatial politics, community organizations, and GIS-based spatial narratives. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 2006, 96(2):323-341. pp
8. Elwood S, Cope M. Introduction: Qualitative GIS. Qualitative GIS: A mixed methods approach 2009, 1-12. Cope M, Elwood S. eds, Los Angeles, CA, Sage, pp
9. Elwood S, Leitner H. GIS and spatial knowledge production for neighborhood revitalization: Negotiating state priorities and neighborhood visions. Journal of Urban Affairs 2003, 25(2):139-157. pp
10. Fiedler R, Schuurman N, Hyndman J. Improving census-based socioeconomic GIS for public policy: Recent immigrants, spatial concentrated poverty and housing need in Vancouver. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies 2006, 4(1):145-171. pp
11. Findlay A M. Population geographies for the 21st century. Scottish Geographical Journal 2003, 3:177-190. pp
12. Flowerdew R, Manley D J, Sabel C E. Neighbourhood effects on health: does it matter where you draw the boundaries? Social Science & Medicine 2008, 66:1241-1255. pp
13. Forest B. Information sovereignty and GIS: the evolution of 'communities of interest' in political redistricting. Political Geography 2004, 23:425-451. pp
14. Fotheringham A S, Wong D W S. The modifiable areal unit problem in multivariate statistical analysis. Environment and Planning A 1991, 23:1025-1044. pp
15. Foucault M. Governmentality. The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality 1991, 201-222. Burchell GGordon CMiller P. eds, London, Harvester Wheatsheaf, pp
16. Foucault M. "Society Must Be Defended": Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975-1976. 2003, Bertani MFontana A. eds) Macey, D. (trans, New York, Picador
17. Graham E. What kind of theory for What kind of population heography? International Journal of Population Geography 2000, 6:257-272. pp
18. Graham E. The past, present, and future of population geography: Reflections on Glenn Trewartha's address fifty years on. Population, Space, and Place 2004, 10:289-294. pp
19. Graham E, Boyle P. Editorial introduction: (Re)theorizing population geography: mapping the unfamiliar. International Journal of Population Geography 2001, 7:389-394. pp
20. Hannah M G. Governmentality and the mastery of territory in nineteenth-century America 2000, Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press
21. Hannah M G. Sampling and the politics of representation in US Census 2000. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 2001, 19:515-534. pp
22. Hanson S. Perspectives on the geographic stability and mobility of people in cities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2005, 102(43):15301-15306. pp
23. Hardwick S W. Place, space, and pattern: Geographical theories in International Migration. Migration theory: Talking across disciplines 2008, 161-182. Brettell C BHollifield J F. eds, 2nd ed, New York, Routledge, pp
24. Harvey F. Reconfiguring administrative geographies in the United States. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies 2006, 4(1):57-79. pp
25. Knigge L, Cope M. Grounded visualization: integrating the analysis of qualitative and quantitative data through grounded theory and visualization. Environment and Planning A 2006, 38:2021-2037. pp
26. Knigge L, Cope M. Grounded visualization and scale: A recursive analysis of community spaces. Qualitative GIS: A mixed methods approach 2009, 95-114. Cope M, Elwood S. eds, Los Angeles, CA, Sage, pp
27. Kwan M. Analysis of human spatial behavior in a GIS environment: Recent developments and future prospects. Journal of Geographical Systems 2000a, 2:85-90. pp
28. Kwan M. Interactive geovisualization of activity-travel patterns using three-dimensional geographical information systems: a methodological exploration with a large data set. Transportation Research Part C 2000b, 8:185-203. pp
29. Kwan M. Feminist visualization: Re-envisioning GIS as a method in feminist geographic research. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 2002, 92(4):645-661. pp
30. Kwan M, Ding G. Geo-narrative: Extending geographic information systems for narrative analysis in qualitative and mixed-method research. The Professional Geographer 2008, 60(4):443-465. pp
31. Kwan M, Schwanen T. Critical quantitative geographies. Environment and Planning A 2009a, 41(2):261-264. pp
32. Kwan M, Schwanen T. Quantitative revolution 2: The critical (re)turn. The Professional Geographer 2009b, 61(3):283-291. pp
33. Lee B A. Beyond the census tract: Patterns and determinants of racial segregation at multiple geographic scales. American Sociological Review 2008, 73:766-791. pp
34. Legg S. Foucault's population geographies: Classifications, biopolitics, and governmental spaces. Population, Space, and Place 2005, 11:137-156. pp
35. Maroko A R. The complexities of measuring access to parks and physical activity sites in New York City: a quantitative and qualitative approach. International Journal of Health Geographics 2009, 8:34-56. pp
36. Martin D. Optimizing census geography: the separation of collection and output geographies. International Journal of Geographic Information Science 1998, 12(7):673-685. pp
37. Martin D, McCann E, Purcell M. Space, scale, governance, and representation: contemporary geographical perspectives on urban politics and policy. Journal of Urban Affairs 2003, 25(2):113-121. pp
38. Massey D. For space 2005, London, Sage
39. Matthews S A, Detwiler J E, Burton L M. Geo-ethnography: coupling geographic information analysis techniques with ethnographic methods in urban research. Cartographica 2005, 40(4):75-90. pp
40. Mennis J. Generating surface models of population using dasymetric mapping. The Professional Geographer 2003, 55(1):31-42. pp
41. Mennis J. Dasymetric mapping for estimating population in small areas. Geography Compass 2009, 3(2):727-745. pp
42. Miller H J, Wentz E A. Representation and spatial analysis in geographic information systems. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 2003, 93(3):574-594. pp
43. Mugerauer R. Qualitative GIS: To mediate, not dominate. Information, place, and cyberspace: Issues in accessibility 2000, 317-338. Janelle D GHodge D C. eds, Berl Springer, pp
44. Openshaw S. Ecological fallacies and the analysis of areal census data. Environment and Planning A 1984a, 16:17-31. pp
45. Openshaw S. The modifiable areal unit problem 1984b, Norwich, UK, GeoBooks
46. O'Sullivan D. Too much of the wrong kind of data: Implications for the practice of micro-scale spatial modeling. Spatially integrated social science 2004, 95-107. Goodchild M FJanelle D G. eds, New York, Oxford University Press, pp
47. Pavlovskaya M. Mapping urban change and changing GIS: other views of economic restructuring. Gender, Place, and Culture 2002, 9(3):281-289. pp
48. Pavlovskaya M. Theorizing with GIS: a tool for critical geographies? Environment and Planning A 2006, 38:2003-2020. pp
49. Pavlovskaya M. Non-quantitative GIS. Qualitative GIS: A mixed methods approach 2009, 13-37. Cope MElwood S. eds, Los Angeles, CA, Sage, pp
50. Pavlovskaya M, St Martin K. Feminism and geographic information systems: from a missing object to a mapping subject. Geography Compass 2007, 1(3):583-606. pp
51. Riebel M. Geographic information systems and spatial data processing in demography: A review. Population Research & Policy Review 2007, 26:601-618. pp
52. Robinson W S. Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals. American Sociological Review 1950, 15(3):351-357. pp
53. Rose-Redwood R S. Governmentality, geography, and the geo-coded world. Progress in Human Geography 2006, 30(4):469-486. pp
54. Ruddell D, Wentz E A. Multi-tasking: Scale in geography. Geography Compass 2009, 3(2):681-697. pp
55. Silvey R. On the boundaries of a Subfield: Social Theory's Incorporation into Population Geography. Population, Space, and Place 2004, 10:303-308. pp
56. Trewartha G T. A case for population geography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 1953, 43(2):71-97. pp
57. Tyner J A. War, violence, and population: Making the body count 2009, New York, Guilford Press
58. Voss P R. Demography as a spatial social science. Population Research & Policy Review 2007, 26:457-476. pp
59. Wachter K W. Spatial demography. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2005, 102(43):15299-15300. pp
60. Weeks J R. The role of spatial analysis in demographic research. Spatially integrated social science 2004, 381-399. Goodchild M FJanelle D G. eds, New York, Oxford University Press, pp
61. White P, Jackson P. (Re)theorising population geography. International Journal of Population Geography 1995, 1:111-123. pp
62. Wong D S. Spatial decomposition of segregation indices: A framework toward measuring segregation at multiple levels. Geographical Analysis 2003, 35(3):179-194. pp