IMproving participation of patients in clinical trials - Rationale and design of IMPACT

BMC Medical Research Methodology

Volumn 10, Issue , 2010, Pages

  Oude Rengerink, Katrien ^a   Opmeer, Brent C ^a   Logtenberg, Sabine L M ^b   Hooft, Lotty ^a   Bloemenkamp, Kitty W M ^c   Haak, Monique C ^d   Oudijk, Martijn A ^e   Spaanderman, Marc E ^f   Duvekot, Johannes J ^g   Willekes, Christine ^h   Van Pampus, Maria G ⁱ   Porath, Martina M ^j   Van Eyck, Jim ^k   Sikkema, Marko J ^l   Mol, Ben Willem J ^a  

^a ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis ^*  (Netherlands)

^c LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^d VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^e UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^f RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^g ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^h MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

ⁱ University Medical Center   (Netherlands)

^j MÁXIMA MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^k ISALA HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^l Hospital Group Twente   (Netherlands)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BELGIUM; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MIDDLE AGED; POLYPHARMACY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RURAL POPULATION; URBAN POPULATION;

ADULT; BELGIUM; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSICIANS, FAMILY; POLYPHARMACY; RURAL POPULATION; URBAN POPULATION;

EID: 77957114896     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712288     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-85     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Recruitment to randomised trials: strategies for trial enrollment and participation study. The STEPS study. MK Campbell C Snowdon D Francis D Elbourne AM McDonald R Knight, et al. Health Technol Assess 2007 11 ii 17999843
2. Survey among 78 studies showed that Lasagna's law holds in Dutch primary care research. JC van der Wouden AH Blankenstein MJ Huibers DA van der Windt WA Stalman AP Verhagen, J Clin Epidemiol 2007 60 819 824 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006. 11.010 17606178
3. Barriers to participation in HIV drug trials: a systematic review. E Mills K Wilson B Rachlis L Griffith P Wu G Guyatt, et al. Lancet Infect Dis 2006 6 32 38 10.1016/S1473-3099(05)70324-8 16377532
4. Barriers to participation in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review. S Ross A Grant C Counsell W Gillespie I Russell R Prescott, J Clin Epidemiol 1999 52 1143 1156 10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00141-9 10580777
5. Lay public's understanding of equipoise and randomisation in randomised controlled trials. EJ Robinson CE Kerr AJ Stevens RJ Lilford DA Braunholtz SJ Edwards, et al. Health Technol Assess 2005 9 1 iv 15763039
6. Incentives and disincentives to participation in randomized controlled trials (review). JM Rendell RK Merrit J Geddes, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007 2 R000021
7. Strategies to improve recruitment to research studies (Cochrane Methodology Review). S Treweek M Pitkethly J Cook M Kjelstrom T Taskila M Johansen F Sullivan S Wilson C Jackson R Jones E Mitchell, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010 4 R000013
8. Recruitment for controlled clinical trials: literature summary and annotated bibliography. LC Lovato K Hill S Hertert DB Hunninghake JL Probstfield, Control Clin Trials 1997 18 328 352 10.1016/S0197-2456(96)00236-X 9257072 (Pubitemid 27337023)
9. A systematic review of reasons for nonentry of eligible patients into surgical randomized controlled trials. NS Abraham JM Young MJ Solomon, Surgery 2006 139 469 483 10.1016/j.surg.2005.08.014 16627056
10. A systematic review highlights threats to validity in studies of barriers to cancer trial participation. D Fayter C McDaid A Eastwood, J Clin Epidemiol 2007 60 990 1001 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.12.013 17884592
11. Barriers to recruiting underrepresented populations to cancer clinical trials: a systematic review. JG Ford MW Howerton GY Lai TL Gary S Bolen MC Gibbons, et al. Cancer 2008 112 228 242 10.1002/cncr.23157 18008363
12. Need for high-quality studies in health technology assessments: the case of a systematic review of treatment for retinoblastoma. CM McDaid S Hartley AM Bagnall G Ritchie K Light RP Riemsma, Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2006 22 408 418 10.1017/S0266462306051324 16984673
13. Barriers to participation in clinical trials of cancer: a meta-analysis and systematic review of patient-reported factors. EJ Mills D Seely B Rachlis L Griffith P Wu K Wilson, et al. Lancet Oncol 2006 7 141 148 10.1016/S1470- 2045(06)70576-9 16455478
14. Attitudes towards and participation in randomised clinical trials in oncology: a review of the literature. PM Ellis, Ann Oncol 2000 11 939 945 10.1023/A:1008342222205 11038029
15. Netherlands Consortium in Obstetrics and Gynaecology. http://www.studies-obsgyn.nl
16. Multivariable model-building - A pragmatic approach to regression analysis based on fractional polynomials for modelling continuous variables. P Royston W Sauerbrei, John Wiley & Sons 2008 47
17. Randomized clinical trials in oncology: understanding and attitudes predict willingness to participate. PM Ellis PN Butow MH Tattersall SM Dunn N Houssami, J Clin Oncol 2001 19 3554 3561 11481363