Orthopaedic trauma research priority-setting exercise and development of a research network

Injury

Volumn 41, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 763-767

  Willed, K M ^a   Gray, B ^b   Moran, C G ^c   Giannoudis, P V ^d   Pallister, I ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b JOHN RADCLIFFE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c NOTTINGHAM UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^e SWANSEA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

AOUK; Collaboration; Consensus; Delphi; Network; Orthopaedic; Priority setting; RCT; Research; Trauma

Indexed keywords

ANKLE; ARTICLE; BONE INJURY; CLAVICLE; CONSENSUS; FEMUR; FOOT; HUMERUS; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDICAL SOCIETY; METHODOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIUS; SCORING SYSTEM; SHOULDER; SURGEON; TIBIA;

EID: 77957114725     PISSN: 00201383     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.03.026     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Beattie E, Mackway-Jones K. A Delphi study to identify performance indicators for emergency medicine. Emerg Med J 2004:21:47-50.
2. Bhandari M, Pape HC, Giannoudis PV. Issues in the planning and conduct of randomised trials. Injury 2006:37:349-54.
3. Butler MM, Meehan TC, Kemple M, et al. Identifying research priorities for midwifery in Ireland. Midwifery 2007. doi: 10.016/j.midw.2007,08,004.
4. Carney O, Mcintosh J, Worth A. The use of Nominal Group Technique in research with community nurses. JAN 1996;23(5):1024-9.
5. Dalkey NC. Predicting the future. http://handle.dtic.mil/100.2/AD676637; 1968 [accessed 10.11.09].
6. Devereaux PJ, Bhandari M, Clarke M, et al. Need for expertise based randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2005:330:88-91.
7. de Villiers MR, de Villiers PJT, Kent AP. The Delphi technique in health sciences education research. Med Teach 2005:27(7):639-43.
8. Drennan J, Meehan T, Kemple M, et al. Nursing research priorities for Ireland. J Nurs Scholarsh 2007;39(4):298-305.
9. Fink A, Kosekoff J, Chassin M, Brook R. Consensus methods: characteristics and guidelines for use. California: RAND Santa Monica; 1991.
10. Hutchinson A, Fowler P. Outcome measures for primary health care: what are the research priorities? Br J Gen Pract 1992;42(359):227-31.
11. Keeney S, Hasson F, McKenna H. Consulting the oracle: ten lessons from using the Delphi technique in nursing research. JAN 2006;53(2):205-12.
12. Kelly JS. Zimmerman LA. Reed K. Enger KS. Immunization information systems national research and evaluation agenda. J Public Health Manage Prac 2007;13(1):35-8.
13. Likert R. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch Psychol 1932;22(140):55.
14. Linstine HA, Turoff M. Introduction to the Delphi method: techniques and applications. In: Linstine HA, Turoff M, editors. The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications. 2002 [accessed 10.11.09] http://www.is.njit.edu/pubs/ delphibook.
15. Mcilfatrick SJ, Keeney S. Identifying cancer nursing research priorities using the Delphi technique. JAN 2003;42(6):629-36.
16. McKee M, Priest P, Ginzler M, et al. How representative are members of expert panels? Qual Assur Health Care 1991:3:89-94.
17. McLeod RS. Issues in surgical randomized controlled trials. World J Surg 1999;23:1210-4.
18. Morgan L, Young JD. Poster presentation. Clinical trials in critical care-where do we go from here: the Intensive Care Society's Research Priority-setting exercise. Presented at: 'Critical Care United - National one day sharing event. A joint initiative hosted by the NHS Modernisation Agency with the Intensive Care Society, Royal College of Nursing, Critical Care Nursing Forum and the British Association of Critical Care Nurses. International Conference Centre, Birmingham; 2004.
19. Mullen PM. Delphi: myths and reality. J Health Organ Manage 2003; 17(1):37-52.
20. Murphy MK, Black N. Lamping DL. et al. Consensus development methods and their use inclinical guidelines development. Health Technol Assess 1998:3:1-100.
21. Obremeskey WT, Pappas N, Attallah-Wasif E, et al. Level of evidence in orthopaedic journals. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2005:87-A:2632-8.
22. Oxford centre for evidence based medicine, http://www.cebm.net/index. aspx?o-1025 [accessed 10.11.09].
23. Palmer N, Batchelor P. Informing research in primary dental care: setting priorities. Prim Dent Care 2006;13(3):85-90.
24. Powell C. The Delphi technique: myths and realities. JAN 2003;41(4):376-82.
25. Sackman H. Delphi assessment: expert opinion, forecasting, and group process. http://handle.dtic.mil/100.2/AD786878; 1974 [accessed 10.11.09].
26. UKCRN. http://www.ukcrn.org.uk/index/networks/comprehensive.html; 2009 [accessed 10.11.09].