Frequency-domain modeling of transients in pipe networks with compound nodes using a laplace-domain admittance matrix

Journal of Hydraulic Engineering

Volumn 136, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 739-755

  Zecchin, Aaron C ^a   Lambert, Martin F ^a   Simpson, Angus R ^a   White, Langford B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Frequency domain; Frequency response; Hydraulic transients; Laplace domain; Pipe networks; Pipeline networks

Indexed keywords

FREQUENCY DOMAINS; HYDRAULIC TRANSIENTS; LAPLACE DOMAINS; PIPE NETWORKS; PIPELINE NETWORKS;

FREQUENCY RESPONSE; HYDRAULICS; LAPLACE TRANSFORMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PIPE; PIPELINES; TOPOLOGY; TRANSIENTS;

TIME DOMAIN ANALYSIS;

FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; HYDRAULICS; LAPLACE TRANSFORM; NUMERICAL MODEL; PIPELINE; TRANSIENT FLOW;

EID: 77957105654     PISSN: 07339429     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000248     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Axworthy D. Water distribution network modelling from steady state to waterhammer. 1997, Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Toronto, Toronto.
2. Barber A. Pneumatic handbook 1989, 7th Ed., Trade and Technical Press, Morden, U.K.
3. Boucher RF, Kitsios EE. Simulation of fluid network dynamics by transmission-line modeling. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part C: J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 1986, 200(1):21-29. PMCSED, 0954-4062, 10.1243/PIME_PROC_1986_200_090_02.
4. Brown F, Nelson S. Step responses of liquid lines with frequency-dependent effects of viscosity. ASME J. Basic Eng. 1965, 87(June):504-510. JBAEAI, 0021-9223.
5. Chaudhry M. Resonance in pressurized piping systems. J. Hydr. Div. 1970, 96(HY9):1819-1839. JYCEAJ, 0044-796X.
6. Chaudhry M. Applied hydraulic transients 1987, 2nd Ed., Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
7. Desoer CA, Kuh ES. Basic circuit theory 1969, McGraw-Hill, New York.
8. Desoer CA, Vidyasagar M. Feedback systems: Input-output properties 1975, Electrical Science Academic Press, New York.
9. Diestel R. Graph theory. Electronic edition 2000, 10.1007/b100033, Springer, New York.
10. Fox J. Hydraulic analysis of unsteady flow in pipe networks 1977, Macmillan, London.
11. Franklin GF, Powell JD, Emami-Naeini A. Feedback control of dynamic systems 2001, 4th Ed., Prentice-Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, N.J. and London.
12. Goodson R, Leonard R. A survey of modeling techniques for fluid line transient. ASME J. Basic Eng. 1972, 94:474-482. JBAEAI, 0021-9223.
13. Izquierdo J, Iglesias PL. Mathematical modelling of hydraulic transients in complex systems. Math. Comput. Modell. 2004, 39(4-5):529-540. MCMOEG, 0895-7177, 10.1016/S0895-7177(04)90524-9.
14. John LR. Forward electrical transmission line model of the human arterial system. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 2004, 42(3):312-321. MBECDY, 0140-0118, 10.1007/BF02344705.
15. Karney B. Analysis of fluid transients in large distribution networks. 1984, Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
16. Kim SH. Impedance matrix method for transient analysis of complicated pipe networks. J. Hydraul. Res. 2007, 45(6):818-828. JHYRAF, 0022-1686.
17. Kim SH. Address-oriented impedance matrix method for generic calibration of heterogeneous pipe network systems. J. Hydraul. Eng. 2008a, 134(1):66-75. JHEND8, 0733-9429, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2008)134:1(66).
18. Kim SH. Impulse response method for pipeline systems equipped with water hammer protection devices. J. Hydraul. Eng. 2008b, 134(7):961-969. JHEND8, 0733-9429, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2008)134:7(961).
19. Kreyszig E. Advanced engineering mathematics 1999, 8th Ed., Wiley, New York.
20. Margolis DL, Yang WC. Bond graph models for fluid networks using modal approximation. ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control 1985, 107(3):169-175. JDSMAA, 0022-0434, 10.1115/1.3140716.
21. Ogawa N. A study on dynamic water pressure in underground pipelines of water supply system during earthquakes. Recent advances in lifeline earthquake engineering in Japan 1980, 43:55-60. H. Shibata, T. Katayma, T. Ariman, eds., ASME, New York, .
22. Stecki JS, Davis DC. Fluid transmission-lines-Distributed parameter models. 1. A review of the state-of-the-art. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., A J. Power Energy 1986, 200(4):215-228. 0957-6509, 10.1243/PIME_PROC_1986_200_032_02.
23. Todini E, Pilati S. A gradient algorithm for the analysis of pipe networks. Computer applications in water supply 1988, B. Coulbeck, C. H. Orr, eds., Research Studies, Letchworth, U.K.
24. Vardy A, Brown J. Transient turbulent friction in smooth pipe flows. J. Sound Vib. 2003, 259(5):1011-1036. JSVIAG, 0022-460X, 10.1006/jsvi.2002.5160.
25. Vardy A, Brown J. Transient turbulent friction in fully-rough pipe flows. J. Sound Vib. 2004, 270:233-257. JSVIAG, 0022-460X, 10.1016/S0022-460X(03)00492-9.
26. Vítkovský J. Inverse analysis and modelling of unsteady pipe flow: Theory, applications and experimental verification. 2001, Ph.D. thesis, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Adelaide Univ., Adelaide, Australia.
27. Wylie E. Resonance in pressurized piping systems. ASME J. Basic Eng. 1965, 87(4):960-966. JBAEAI, 0021-9223.
28. Wylie E, Streeter V. Fluid transients in systems 1993, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
29. Zecchin AC, Simpson A, Lambert M, White LB, Vitkovsky JP. Transient modelling of arbitrary pipe networks by a Laplace-domain admittance matrix. J. Eng. Mech. 2009, 135(6):538-547. JENMDT, 0733-9399, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2009)135:6(538).
30. Zielke W. Frequency-dependent friction in transient pipe flow. ASME J. Basic Eng. 1968, 90(1):109-115. JBAEAI, 0021-9223.