Chapter Eight Odor perception and the variability in natural odor scenes

Recent Advances in Phytochemistry

Volumn 39, Issue C, 2005, Pages 191-226

  Wright, Geraldine A ^a   Thomson, Mitchell G A ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77957095238     PISSN: 00799920     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S0079-9920(05)80009-7     Document Type: Chapter

References (166)

1. Dobson H.E.M. Floral volatiles in insect biology. In: Bernays E.A. (Ed). Insect-plant Interactions (1994), CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL 47-81
2. Laurent G. Olfactory network dynamics and the coding of multidimensional signals. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 3 (2002) 884-895
3. Pichersky E., and Gershenzon J. The formation and function of plant volatiles: perfumes for pollinator attraction and defense. Curr. Opin. Plant. Biol. 5 (2002) 237-243
4. Knudsen J.T., Tollsten L., and Bergstrom L.G. Floral scents - a checklist of volatile compounds isolated by headspace techniques. Phytochemistry 33 (1993) 253-280
5. Levin R.A., Raguso R.A., and McDade L.A. Fragrance chemistry and pollinator affinities in Nyctaginaceae. Phytochemistry 58 (2001) 429-440
6. Murlis J. Odor plumes and the signal they provide. In: Carde R.T., and Minks A.K. (Eds). Insect Pheromone Research (1997), Chapman and Hall, London, UK 221-231
7. Crimaldi J.P., Wiley M.B., and Koseff J.R. The relationship between mean and instantaneous structure in turbulent passive scalar plumes. J. Turbul. 3 (2002) 1-24
8. Mori K., Nagao H., and Sasaki Y.F. Computation of molecular information in mammalian olfactory system. Network: Comp. Neur. Sys. 9 (1998) 79-102
9. th ed. (1986), John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY
10. Letcher T.M., and Naicker P.K. Determination of vapor pressures using gas chromatography. J. Chrom. A 1037 (2004) 107-114
11. Noble A.C., and Ebeler S.E. Use of multivariate statistics in understanding wine flavor. Food Rev. Intl. 18 (2002) 1-21
12. Collins S.B., Perez-Camargo G., Gettinby G., Butterwick R.F., Batt R.M., and Giffard C.J. Development of a technique for the in vivo assessment of flatulence in dogs. Amer. J. Vet. Res. 62 (2001) 1014-1019
13. Whitfield F.B. Microbiology of food taints. Intl. J. Food Sci. Tech. 33 (1998) 31-51
14. Dekker T., Steib B., Carde R.T., and Geier M. L-lactic acid: A human-signifying host cue for the anthropophilic mosquito, Anopheles gambiae. Med. Vet. Entomol. 16 (2002) 91-98
15. Barrozo R.B., and Lazzari C.R. The response of the blood-sucking bug Triatoma infestans to carbon dioxide and other host odours. Chem. Sens. 29 (2004) 319-329
16. Dudareva N., and Pichersky E. Biochemical and molecular genetic aspects of floral scents. Plant. Phys. 122 (2000) 627-633
17. Piechulla B., and Pott M.B. Plant scents - mediators of inter- and intraorganismic communication. Planta 217 (2003) 687-689
18. Turlings T.C.J., Loughrin J.H., Röse U., Mccall P.J., Lewis W.J., and Tumlinson J.H. How caterpillar-damaged plants protect themselves by attracting parasitic wasps. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92 (1995) 4169-4174
19. Baldwin I.T., Kessler A., and Halitschke R. Volatile signaling in plant-plant-herbivore interactions: what is real?. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 5 (2002) 351-354
20. Bergstrom G., Dobson H.E.M., and Groth I. Spatial fragrance patterns within the flowers of Ranunculus-acris (Ranunculaceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 195 (1995) 221-242
21. Cook S.M., Bartlet E., Murray D.A., and Williams I.H. The role of pollen odour in the attraction of pollen beetles to oilseed rape flowers. Ent. exp. appl. 104 (2002) 43-50
22. Goodwin S.M., Kolosova N., Kish C.M., Wood K.V., Dudareva N., and Jenks M.A. Cuticle characteristics and volatile emissions of petals in Antirrhinum majus. Physiol. Plant 117 (2003) 435-443
23. Shalit M., Guterman I., Volpin H., Bar E., Tamari T., Menda N., Adam Z., Zamir D., Vainstein A., Weiss D., Pichersky E., and Lewinsohn E. Volatile ester formation in roses. Identification of an acetylcoenzyme A. Geraniol/citronellol acetyltransferase in developing rose petals. Plant Phys. 131 (2003) 1868-1876
24. Sreng L. Cockroach mating behaviors, sex-pheromones, and abdominal glands (Dictyoptera, Blaberidae). J. Insect Behav. 6 (1993) 715-735
25. Foster S.P. Periodicity of sex pheromone biosynthesis, release and degradation in the lightbrown apple moth, Epiphyas postvittana (Walker). Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 43 (2000) 125-136
26. Brennan P.A., and Keverne E.B. Something in the air? New insights into mammalian pheromones. Curr. Biol. 14 (2004) R81-R89
27. Degen T., Dillmann C., Marion-Poll F., and Turlings T.C.J. High genetic variability of herbivore-induced volatile emission within a broad range of maize inbred lines. Plant Physiol. 135 (2004) 1928-1938
28. Barlow H.B. The coding of sensory messages. In: Thorpe W.H., and Zangwill O.L. (Eds). Current Problems in Animal Behaviour (1961), Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK 331-360
29. Barlow H.B. Possible processes underlying the transformation of sensory messages. In: Rosenblith W. (Ed). Sensory Communication (1961), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 217
30. Gibson J.J. The Perception of the Visual World (1966), Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA
31. Mackay D.M. Vision - the capture of optical variation. In: Pettigrew J.D., Sandison K.T., and Levick W.R. (Eds). Visual Neuroscience (1986), Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK 365-373
32. Field D.J. Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response profiles of cortical cells. J. Opt. Soc. Amer. 4 (1987) 2379-2394
33. Attneave F. Informational aspects of visual perception. Psychol. Rev. 61 (1954) 183
34. Simoncelli E.P., and Olshausen B.A. Natural image statistics and neural representation. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 24 (2001) 1193-1216
35. Marshall J., Oberwinkler J., The colourful world of the mantis shrimp. Nature, 401, 873-874.
36. Rubin B.D., and Katz L.C. Optical imaging of odorant representations in the mammalian of factory bulb. Neuron 23 (1999) 499-511
37. Linster C., Johnson B.A., Yue E., Morse A., Xu Z., Hingco E.E., Choi Y.J., Choi M., Messiha A., and Leon M. Perceptual correlates of neural representations evoked by odorant enantiomers. J. Neurosci 21 (2001) 9837-9843
38. Murlis J., Willis M.A., and Carde R.T. Spatial and temporal structures of pheromone plumes in fields and forests. Physiol. Entomol. 25 (2000) 211-222
39. Crimaldi J.P., and Koseff J.R. High-resolution measurements of the spatial and temporal, scalar structure of a turbulent plume. Exp. Fluids 31 (2001) 90-102
40. Weissburg M.J., and Dusenbery D.B. Behavioral observations and computer simulations of blue crab movement to a chemical source in a controlled turbulent flow. J. Exp. Biol. 205 (2002) 3387-3398
41. Weissburg M.J., Dusenbery D.B., Ishida H., Janata J., Keller T., Roberts P.J.W., and Webster D.R. A multidisciplinary study of spatial and temporal scales containing information in turbulent chemical plume tracking. Environ. Fluid Mech. 2 (2002) 65-94
42. Murlis J., Elkinton J.S., and Carde R.T. Odor plumes and how insects use them. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 37 (1992) 505-532
43. Jones C.D. On the structure of instantaneous plumes in the atmosphere. J. Hazard Mat. 7 (1983) 87-112
44. Finelli C.M., Pentcheff N.D., Zimmer R.K., and Wethey D.S. Physical constraints on ecological processes: a field test, of odor, mediated foraging. Ecol. 81 (2000) 784-797
45. Moore P.a., Grills J.L., and Schneider R.W.S. Habitat-specific signal structure for olfaction: An example from artificial streams. J. Chem. Ecol. 26 2 (2000) 465-584
46. Tomba A.M., Keller T.A., and Moore P.A. Foraging in complex odor landscapes: chemical orientation strategies during stimulation by conflicting chemical cues. J. N. Amer. Benthol. Soc. 20 (2001) 211-222
47. Mylne K.R., and Mason P.J. Concentration fluctuation measurements in a dispersing plume at a range of up to 1000-m. Quart. J. Royal Meteorol. Soc. 117 (1991) 177-206
48. Grasso F.W., and Basil J.A. How lobsters, crayfishes, and crabs find important sources of odor: current perspectives and future directions. Curr. Opin Neurobiol. 12 (2002) 721-727
49. Eisner T. For Love of Insects (2003), Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
50. Lariviere S., and Messier F. Aposematic behaviour in the striped skunk. Mephitis mephitis, Ethol. 102 (1996) 986-992
51. Eisner T., Aneshansley D.J., Yack J., Attygalle A.B., and Eisner M. Spray mechanism, of crepidogastrine bombardier beetles (Carabidae; Crepidogastrini). Chemoecol. 11 (2001) 209-219
52. Kim J.Y., Hasegawa M., and Leal W.S. Chemoecol. 12 (2002) 121-124
53. Miklas N., Renou M., Malosse I., and Malosse C. Repeatability of pheromone blend composition in individual males of the southern green stink bug, Nezara viridula. J. Chem. Ecol. 26 (2000) 2473-2485
54. Barkman T.J., Beaman J.H., and Gage D.A. Floral fragrance variation in Cypripedium: Implications for evolutionary and ecological studies. Phytochem. 44 (1997) 875-882
55. Ma W., and Klemm W.R. Variations of equine urinary volatile compounds during the oestrous cycle. Vet. Res. Commun. 21 (1997) 437-446
56. Rekwot P.I., Ogwu D., Oyedipe E.O., and Sekoni V.O. The role of pheromones and biostimulation in animal reproduction. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 65 (2001) 157-170
57. Swaisgood R.R., Lindburg D.G., and Zhang H. Discrimination of oestrous status in giant pandas (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) via chemical cues in urine. J. Zool. 257 (2002) 381-386
58. Keverne E.B. Vomeronasal/accessory olfactory system and pheromonal recognition. Chem. Sens. 23 (1998) 491-494
59. Helsper J.P.F.G., Davies J.A., Bouwmeester H.J., Krol A.F., and Van Kampen M.H. Circadian rhythmicity in emission of volatile compounds by flowers of Rosa hybrida L. Cv. Honesty. Planta 207 (1998) 88-95
60. Kolosova N., Sherman D., Karlson D., and Dudareva N. Cellular and subcellular localization of S-adenosyl-L-methionine: benzoic acid carboxyl methyltransferase, the enzyme responsible for biosynthesis of the volatile ester methylbenzoate in snapdragon flowers. Plant Phys. 125 (2001) 1-9
61. Pott M.B., Pichersky E., and Piechulla B. Evening specific oscillations of scent emission SAMT enzyme activity, and SAMT mRNA in flowers of Stephanotis floribunda. J. Plant Physiol. 159 (2002) 925-934
62. Raguso R.A., Levin R.A., Foose S.E., Holmberg M.W., and Mcdade L.A. Fragrance chemistry, nocturnal rhythms and pollination "syndromes" in Nicotiana. Phytochemistry 63 (2003) 265-284
63. Thomson D.J. Spectrum estimation and harmonic analysis. Proc. IEEE 70 (1982) 1055-1091
64. Nikias C., and Petropolu A. Higher-order Spectra Analysis (1996), Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ
65. Raguso R.A. Olfactory landscapes and deceptive pollination. In: Blomquist G.L., and Vogt R.G. (Eds). Insect Pheromone Biochemistry and Molecular Biology: The Biosynthesis and Detection of Pheromones and Plant Volatiles (2003), Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands
66. Mcelfresh J.S., and Millar J.G. Geographic variation in the pheromone system of the saturniid moth Hemileuca eglanterina. Ecol. 82 (2001) 3505-3518
67. rd ed (1979), Pergamom Press, Oxford, UK
68. Raguso R.A., and Willis M.A. Synergy between visual and olfactory cues in nectar feeding by naive hawkmoths Manduca sexta. Anim. Behav. 64 (2002) 685-695
69. Schiestl F.P., and Ayasse M. Post-pollination emission of a repellent compound in a sexually deceptive orchid: a new mechanism for maximising reproductive success?. Oecol. 126 (2001) 531-534
70. Negre F., Kish C.M., Boatright J., Underwood B., Shibuya K., Wagner C., Clark D.G., and Dudareva N. Regulation of methylbenzoate emission after pollination in snapdragon and petunia flowers. Plant Cell 15 (2003) 2992-3006
71. Knudsen J.T., and Tollsten L. Trends in floral scent chemistry in pollination syndromes - floral scent composition in moth-pollinated taxa. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 113 (1993) 263-284
72. Boatright J., Negre F., Chen X.L., Kish C.M., Wood B., Peel G., Orlova I., Gang D., Rhodes D., and Dudareva N. Understanding in vivo benzenoid metabolism in Petunia petal tissue. Plant Physiol. 135 (2004) 1993-2011
73. Dobson H.E.M., and Bergstrom G. The ecology and evolution of pollen odors. Plant Syst. Evol. 222 (2000) 63-87
74. Vainstein A., Lewinsohn E., Pichersky E., and Weiss D. Floral fragrance: New inroads into an old commodity. Plant Physiol. 127 (2001) 1383-1389
75. Dobson H.E.M., Arroyo J., Bergstrom G., and Groth I. Interspecific variation in floral fragrances within the genus Narcissus (Amaryllidaceae). Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 25 (1997) 685-706
76. Mactavish H.S., and Menary R.C. Volatiles in different floral organs, and effect of floral characteristics on yield of extract from Boronia megastigma (Nees). Annal. Bot. 80 (1997) 305-311
77. Grison L., Edwards A.A., and Hossaert-Mckey M. Interspecies variation in floral fragrances emitted by tropical Ficus species. Phytochemistry 52 (1999) 1293-1299
78. Andersson S., Nilsson L.A., Groth I., and Bergstrom G. Floral scents in butterfly-pollinated plants: possible convergence in chemical composition. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 140 (2002) 129-153
79. Kunin W.E. Sex and the single mustard: population density and pollinator behavior effects on seed-set. Ecology 74 (1993) 2145-2160
80. Kunin W., and Iwasa Y. Pollinator foraging strategies in mixed floral arrays: Density effects and floral constancy. Theor. Pop. Biol. 49 (1996) 232-263
81. in press. Wright G.A., Lutmerding A., Dudareva N., and Smith B.H. Intensity and the ratios of compounds in the scent of snapdragon flowers affect scent discrimination by honey bees (Apis mellifera). J. Comp. Phys. A (2005)
82. Kim H.J., Kim K., Kim N.S., and Lee D.S. Determination of floral fragrances of Rosa hybrida using solidphase trapping-solvent extraction and gas chromatographymass spectrometry. J. Chrom. A 902 (2000) 389-404
83. Kim N.S., and Lee D.S. Comparison of different extraction methods for the analysis of fragrances from Lavandula species by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. J. Chrom. A 982 (2002) 31-47
84. Azuma H., Toyota M., and Asakawa Y. Intraspecific variation of floral scent chemistry in Magnolia kobus Dc. (Magnoliaceae). J. Plant Res. 114 (2001) 411-422
85. Knudsen J.T. Variation in floral scent composition within and between populations of Geonoma macrostachys (Arecaceae) in the western Amazon. Amer. J. Bot. 89 (2002) 1772-1778
86. Dufa M., Hossaert-Mckey M., and Anstett M.C. Temporal and sexual variation of leaf-produced pollinator-attracting odours in the dwarf palm. Oecologia 139 (2004) 392-398
87. Dudareva N., Murfitt L.M., Mann C.J., Gorenstein N., Kolosova N., Kish C.M., Bonham C., and Wood K. Developmental regulation of methyl benzoate biosynthesis and emission in snapdragon flowers. Plant Cell. 12 (2000) 949-961
88. Robertson G.W., Griffiths D.W., Macfarlane Smith D., and Butcher R.D. The application of thermal desorption-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry to the analyses of flower volatiles from five varieties of oilseed rape (Brassica napus spp. oleifera). Phytochem. Anal. 4 (1993) 152-157
89. Porter A.E.A., Griffiths D.W., Robertson G.W., and Sexton R. Floral volatiles of the sweet pea, Lathyrus odoratus. Phytochemistry 51 (1999) 211-214
90. Ayasse M., Schiestl F.P., Paulus H.F., Lofstedt C., Hansson B., Ibarra F., and Francke W. Evolution of reproductive strategies in the sexually deceptive orchid Ophrys sphegodes: how does flower specific variation of odor signals influence reproductive success?. Evol. 54 (2000) 1995-2006
91. Matile P., and Altenburger R. Rhythms of fragrance emission in flowers. Planta 174 (1988) 242-247
92. Svensson M.G.E., Bengtsson M., and Lofqvist J. Individual variation and repeatability of sex pheromone emission of female turnip moths Agrotis segetum. J. Chem. Ecol. 23 (1997) 1833-1850
93. Gemeno C., Lutfallah A.F., and Haynes K.F. Pheromone blend variation and cross-attraction among populations of the black cutworm moth (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Ann. Entomolog. Soc. Amer. 93 (2000) 1322-1328
94. Sokal R., and Rohlf F.J. Biometry (1995), W.H. Freeman and Co., New York, NY
95. Rencher A.C. Interpretation of canonical discriminant functions, canonical variates, and principal components. Am. Stat. 46 (1992) 217-225
96. th ed (1998), Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ
97. Eisthen H.L. Why are olfactory systems of different animals so similar?. Brain Behav. and Evol. 59 (2002) 273-293
98. Hildebrand J.G., and Shepherd G.M. Mechanisms of olfactory discrimination: converging evidence for common principles across phyla. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 20 (1997) 595-631
99. Buck L., and Axel R. A novel multigene family may encode odorant receptors-A molecular-basis for odor recognition. Cell 65 1 (1991) 175-187
100. Vosshall L.B., Amrein H., Morozov P.S., Rzhetsky A., and Axel R. A spatial map of olfactory receptor expression in the Drosophila antenna. Cell 96 (1999) 725-736
101. Ma M.H., and Shepherd G.M. Functional mosaic organization of mouse olfactory receptor neurons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci USA 97 (2000) 12869-12874
102. Firestein S. How the olfactory system makes sense of scents. Nature 413 (2001) 211-218
103. Mombaerts P. Targeting olfaction. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 6 (1996) 481-486
104. Menzel R. Searching for the memory trace in a mini-brain, the honeybee. Learn. Mem. 8 (2001) 53-62
105. Faber T., and Menzel R. Visualizing mushroom body response to a conditioned odor in honeybees. Naturwissenschaften 88 (2001) 472-476
106. Justus K.A., Schofield S.W., Murlis J., and Carde R.T. Flight behaviour of Cadra cautella males in rapidly pulsed pheromone plumes. Phys. Entomol. 27 (2002) 58-66
107. Breed M.D., Guzman-Novoa E., and Hunt G.J. Defensive behavior of honey bees: Organization, genetics, and comparisons with other bees. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 49 (2004) 271-298
108. Hudson R. From molecule to mind: the role of experience in shaping olfactory function. J. Comp. Phys. A 185 (1999) 297-304
109. Pavlov I.P. Conditioned Reflexes (1927), Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, UK
110. Pearce J.M. Similarity and discrimlnation: a selective review and a connectionist model. Psychol. Rev. 101 (1994) 587-607
111. Shepard R.N. Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science. Science 237 (1987) 1317-1323
112. Winston M.L. The Biology of the Honey Bee (1987), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
113. Wright G.A., Skinner B.D., and Smith B.H. The ability of the honey bee, Apis mellifera, to detect and discriminate among the odors of varieties of canola flowers (Brassica rapa and Brassica napus) and snapdragon flowers (Antirrhinum majus). J. Chem. Ecol. 28 (2002) 721-740
114. Price E., Dally M., Erhard H., Gerzevske M., Kelly M., Moore N., Schultze A., and Topper C. Manupulating odor cues facilitates add-on fostering in sheep. J. Anim. Sci. 76 (1998) 961-964
115. Levy F., Keller A., and Poindron P. Olfactory regulation of material behavior in mammals. Horm. Behav. 46 (2004) 284-302
116. Giurfa M. The repellent scent-mark of the honeybee Apis-mellifer-ligustica and its role as communication cue during foraging. Insectes Sociaux 40 (1993) 59-67
117. Bowden R.M., Willamson S., and Breed M.D. Floral oils: their effect on nestmate recognition in the honeybee, Apis mellifera. Insectes Sociaux 45 (1998) 209-214
118. Moritz R.F.A., and Neumann P. Differences in nestmate recognition for drones and workers in the honeybee, Apis mellifera (L.). Anim. Behav. 67 (2004) 681-688
119. Wood M.J., and Ratnieks F.L.W. Olfactory cues and Vespula wasp recognition by honey bee guards. Apidol. 35 (2004) 461-468
120. Wise P.M., and Cain W.S. Latency and accuracy of discriminations of odor quality between binary mixtures and their components. Chem. Sens. 25 (2000) 247-265
121. Laska M., Galizia C.G., Giurfa M., and Menzel R. Olfactory discrimination ability and odor structure-activity relationships in honeybees. Chem. Sens. 22 (1999) 457-465
122. Laska M., and Teubner P. Olfactory discrimination ability for homologous series of aliphatic alcohols and aldehydes. Chem. Sens. 24 (1999) 263-270
123. Laska M., and Freyer D. Olfactory discrimination ability for aliphatic esters in squirrel monkeys and humans. Chem. Sens. 22 (1997) 457-465
124. Daly K.C., Chandra S., Durtschi M.L., and Smith B.H. The generalization of an olfactory-based conditioned response reveals unique but overlapping odour representations in the month Manduca sexta. J. Exp. Biol 204 (2001) 3085-3095
125. Laska M., and Hubener F. Olfactory discrimination ability for homologous series of aliphatic ketones and acetic ester. Behav. Brain Res. 119 (2001) 193-201
126. Laska M., and Hudson R. Discriminating parts from the whole-determinants of odor mixture perception in squirrel-monkeys, Saimiri-sciureus. J. Com. Phys. A 173 (1993) 249-256
127. Laska M., and Hudson R. Ability to discriminate between related odor mixtures. Chem. Sens. 17 (2002) 403-415
128. Grosch W. Evaluation of key odorants of foods by dilution experiments, aroma models, and omission. Chem. Sens. 26 (2001) 533-545
129. Laing D.G. Perceptual odour interactions and objective mixture analyses. Food Qual. Pref. 5 (1994) 75-80
130. Chandra S.B.C., and Smith B.H. An analysis of synthetic odor processing of odor mixtures in the honeybee, (Apis mellifera). J. Exp. Biol. 201 (1998) 3113-3121
131. Laing D. G. Perception of odor mixtures. in: Handbook of Olfaction and Gustation (R. L. Doty, ed.)M. Dekker, New York, NY. pp.283-298.
132. Marr D. Vision: A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information (1982), W.H. Freeman, San Francisco, CA
133. 1925. Zwaardemaker H. L'odorat (1925), Doin, Paris
134. Bhagavan S., and Smith B.H. Olfactory conditioning in the honeybee, Apis mellifera: the effects of odor intensity. Physiol. Behav. 61 (1996) 107-117
135. Pelz C., Gerber B., and Menzel R. Odorant intensity as a determinant for olfactory conditioning in the honeybee: Roles in discrimination, overshadowing, and memory consoliddation. J. Exp. Biol. 200 (1997) 837-847
136. Wright G.A., and Smith B.H. Different thresholds for detection and discrimination of odors in the honey bee (Apis mellifera). Chem. Sens. 29 (2004) 127-135
137. Laska M., and Seibt A. Olfactory sensitivity for aliphatic alcohols in squirrel monkeys and pigtail macaques. J. Exp. Biol. 205 (2002) 1633-1643
138. Cleland T.A., and Narla V.A. Intensity modulation of olfactory acuity. Behav. Neurosci. 117 (2003) 1434-1440
139. Laing D.G., Legha P.K., Jinks A.L., and Hutchinson I. Relationship between molecular structure, concentration and odor qualities of oxygenated aliphatic molecules. Chem. Sens. 28 (2003) 57-69
140. Arctander S. Perfume and Flavor Chemicals (Aroma Chemicals) (1969), Stefan's Arctander's Publications, Las Vegas
141. Gross-Isseroff R., and Lancet D. Concentration-dependent changes of perceived odor quality. Chem. Sens. 13 (1988) 191-204
142. Marfaing P., Rouault J., and Laffort P. Effect of the concentration and nature of olfactory stimuli on the proboscis extension of conditioned honeybees (Apis mellifera ligustica). J. Insect Phys. 35 (1989) 949-955
143. Wise P.M., Olsson M.J., and Cain W.S. Quantification of odor quality. Chem. Sens. 25 (2000) 429-443
144. Ditzen M., Evers J.F., and Galizia C.G. Odor similarity does not influence the time needed for odor processing. Chem. Sens. 28 (2003) 781-789
145. Dethier V.G. The Hungry Fly: A Physiological Study of the Behavior Associated with Feeding (1975), Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA
146. Erbilgin N., Powell J.S., and Raffa K.F. Effect of varying monoterpene concentrations on the response of Ips pini (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to its aggregation pheromone: implications for pest management and ecology of bark beetles. Agric. Forest Entomol. 5 (2003) 269-274
147. Fadamiro H.Y., and Baker T.C. Helicoverpa zea males (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) respond to the intermittent fine structure of their sex pheromone plume and an antagonist in a flight tunnel. Physiol. Entomol. 22 (1997) 316-324
148. Fadamiro H.Y., Cosse A.A., and Baker T.C. Fine-scale resolution of closely spaced pheromone and antagonist filaments by flying male Helicoverpa zea. J. Comp. Physiol. A 185 (1999) 131-141
149. Bau J., Justus K.A., and Carde R.T. Antennal resultion of pulsed pheromone plumes in three moth species. J. Insect Phys. 48 (2002) 433-442
150. Rospars J.P., Lansky P., and Krivan V. Extracellular transduction events under pulsed stimulation in moth olfactory sensilla. Chem. Sens. 28 (2000) 509-522
151. ROspars J.P., and Lansky P. Stochastic pulse stimulation in chemoreceptors and its properties. Math. Biosci. 188 (2004) 133-145
152. Todd J.L., and Baker T.C. Function of peripheral olfactory organs. In: Hansson B.S. (Ed). Insect Olfaction (1999), Springer, Berlin, Germany
153. Keller T.A., and Weissburg M.J. Effects of odor flux and pulse rate on chemosensory tracking in turbulent odor plumes by the blue crab, Callinectes sapidus. Biol. Bull. 207 (2004) 44-55
154. Kaissling K.E. Flux detectors versus concentration detectors: Two types of chemoreceptors. Chem. Sens. 23 (1998) 99-111
155. Vickers N.J. Defining a synthetic pheromone blend attractive to male Heliothis subflexa under wind tunnel conditions. J. Chem. Ecol. 28 (2002) 1255-1267
156. Ferveur J.F., Cobb M., Boukella H., and Jallon J.M. World-wide variation in Drosophila melanogaster sex pheromone: Behavioural effects, genetic bases and potential evolutionary consequences. Genetica 97 (1996) 73-80
157. Raffa K.F. Mixed messages across multiple trophic levels: the ecology of bark beetle chemical communication systems. Chemoecology 11 (2001) 49-65
158. Symonds M.R.E., and Elgar M.A. The mode of pheromone evolution: Evidence from bark beetles. Proc. Roy. Soc. B (2004) 839-846
159. Osada K., Yamazaki K., Curran M., Bard J., Smith B.P.C., and Beauchamp G.K. The scent of age. Proc. Roy. Soc. B 270 (2003) 929-933
160. Ribbands C.R. The foraging method of individual honey bees. J. Anim. Ecol. 18 (1949) 47-66
161. Smith B.H., and Cobey S. The olfactory memory of the honeybee Apis-mellifera. 2. Blocking between odorants in binary-mixtures. J. Exp. Biol. 195 (1994) 91-108
162. Couvillon P.A., Arakaki L., and Bitterman M.E. Intramodal blocking in honeybees. Anim. Learn. Behav. 25 (1997) 277-282
163. Hosler J.S., and Smith B.H. Blocking and the detection of odor components in blends. J. Exp. Biol. 203 (2000) 2797-2806
164. Giannaris E.L., Cleland T.A., and Linster C. Intramodal blocking between olfactory stimuli in rats. Physiol. Behav. 75 (2002) 717-722
165. Wright G.A., and Smith B.H. Variation in complex olfactory stimuli and its influence on odour recognition. Proc. Roy. Soc. B 271 (2004) 147-152
166. Roberts S.C., and Gosling L.M. Genetic similarity and quality interact in mate choice decisions by female mice. Nature Gen. 35 (2003) 103-106