Chapter 16 Teaching Clay Science: A Great Perspective

Developments in Clay Science

Volumn 1, Issue C, 2006, Pages 1183-1195

  Berry, R W ^a   Bergaya, F ^b   Lagaly, G ^c  

^a SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITÉ D'ORLÉANS   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF KIEL   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77957087453     PISSN: 15724352     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S1572-4352(05)01044-5     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Berry R.W. Rubrics in teaching assessment. In: Rule A.C., and Guggenheim S. (Eds). Teaching Clay Science. CMS Workshop Lectures vol. 11 (2002), The Clay Minerals Society
2. In: Brady J.B., Mogk D.W., and Perkins II D. (Eds). Teaching Mineralogy (1997), Mineralogical Society
3. California Department of Education and the California Association for the Gifted. Differentiating the core curriculum and instruction to provide advanced learning opportunities. A position paper (1994), California Department of Education, Sacramento, CA
4. Cawelti G. Portrait of a benchmark school. Educational Leadership 57 (2000) 42-44
5. Churchman G.J. R.I.P. another clay research group. New Zealand Soil News 50 (2002) 118-119
6. Churchman G.J., and Theng B.K.G. Clay research in Australia and New Zealand. Applied Clay Science 20 (2002) 153-156
7. Grim R.E. Clay Mineralogy (1953), McGraw-Hill, New York
8. Guggenheim S., and Kane S. Cooperative learning techniques: applications to clay science. In: Rule A.C., and Guggenheim S. (Eds). Teaching Clay Science. CMS Workshop Lectures vol. 11 (2002), The Clay Minerals Society
9. Marzano R.J., and Kendall J.S. A Comprehensive Guide to Designing Standards-based Districts, Schools, and Classrooms (1996), Association for Supervision and Curriculum
10. Millot, G., 1989. Opening lecture. 9th International Clay Conference, Strasbourg, personal communication.
11. Noyce P., Persa D., and Traver R. Creating data-driven schools. Educational Leadership 57 (2000) 52-56
12. Ridky R. Why we need a corps of earth science educators. Geotimes 47 9 (2002) 16-19
13. Rule A.C. Using analogies to enhance learning in clay science. In: Rule A.C., and Guggenheim S. (Eds). Teaching Clay Science. CMS Workshop Lectures vol. 11 (2002), The Clay Minerals Society
14. Rule A.C. Learning theory and national standards applied to teaching clay science. In: Rule A.C., and Guggenheim S. (Eds). Teaching Clay Science. CMS workshop lectures vol. 11 (2002), The Clay Minerals Society
15. In: Rule A.C., and Guggenheim S. (Eds). Teaching Clay Science. CMS Workshop Lectures vol. 11 (2002), The Clay Minerals Society
16. Sarrazin, C., 2004. Lutte contre le psylle, protéger le poirier avec l'argile blanche. La France Agricole, p. 43.
17. Srogi L.A., and Baloche L. Using cooperative learning to teach mineralogy (and other courses, too!). In: Brady J.B., Mogk D.W., and Perkins II D. (Eds). Teaching Mineralogy 406 (1997), Mineralogical Society
18. Taniguchi, N., 1974. On the basic concept of 'nano-technology.' Proceedings of the International Conference of Product Engineering, Tokyo, Part II. Japan Society of Precision Engineering, Tokyo.
19. Thayer Y. Virginia's standards make all students stars. Educational Leadership 57 (2000) 70-72
20. Thomas, R.C., 2002. DIALOGUE: Overcoming obstacles to incorporating experiential learning into the geology curriculum. GSA Today 12, 8, 11.
21. Tomlinson C.A. How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms (1995), Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandria, VA