Neonatal outcome of preterm delivery

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Volumn 1205, Issue , 2010, Pages 130-134

  Iacovidou, Nicoletta ^a   Varsami, Marianna ^a   Syggellou, Angeliki ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

Author keywords

ELBW; morbidity; neurodevelopmental outcome; preterm birth; survival

Indexed keywords

BRAIN DEVELOPMENT; CONFERENCE PAPER; EXTREMELY LOW BIRTH WEIGHT; HUMAN; NEWBORN CARE; NEWBORN MORBIDITY; NEWBORN MORTALITY; OVERALL SURVIVAL; PERINATAL CARE; PREMATURE LABOR; PREMATURITY; PREVALENCE; SURVIVAL RATE; BRAIN; COGNITION DISORDERS; DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES; FEMALE; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; INFANT, NEWBORN, DISEASES; MORBIDITY; MORTALITY; NEWBORN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PREGNANCY; PREMATURE BIRTH;

BRAIN; COGNITION DISORDERS; DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; INFANT, NEWBORN, DISEASES; MORBIDITY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PREGNANCY; PREMATURE BIRTH;

EID: 77957062320     PISSN: 00778923     EISSN: 17496632     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05657.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (38)

1. Hack,M.,D.J.Flannery,M. Schluchter, et al. 2002. Outcomes in young adulthood for very-low-birth-weight infants. N. Engl. J. Med. 346: 149-157.
2. Marlow, N. 2004. Neurocognitive outcome after very pretermbirth. Arch. Dis. Child Fetal Neonatal. Ed. 89: F224- 228.
3. Goldenberg, R.L. 2002. The management of preterm labor. Obstet. Gynecol. 100: 1020-1037.
4. Joseph, K.S., S. Marcoux, A. Ohlsson, et al. 2001. Changes in stillbirth and infant mortality associated with increases in preterm birth among twins. Pediatrics 108: 1055-1061.
5. Challis, J.R., S.J. Lye, W. Gibb, et al. 2001. Understanding preterm labor. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 943: 225-234.
6. Wen, S.W., G. Smith, Q. Yang & M.Walker. 2004. Epidemiology of preterm birth and neonatal outcome. Semin. Fetal. Neonatal. Med. 9: 429-435.
7. Repka, M.X. 2002. Ophthalmological problems of the premature infant. Ment. Retard. Dev. Disabil. Res. Rev. 8: 249-257.
8. Meadow, W., G. Lee, K. Lin & J. Lantos. 2004. Changes in mortality for extremely low birth weight infants in the 1990s: implications for treatment decisions and resource use. Pediatrics 113: 1223-1229.
9. Hack, M. & A.A. Fanaroff. 2005. Outcomes of children of extremely low birthweight and gestational age in the 1990s. Semin. Neonatol. 5: 89-106.
10. Aylward, G.P. 2002. Cognitive and neuropsychological outcomes: more than IQ scores.Ment. Retard. Dev. Disabil. Res. Rev. 8: 234-240.
11. Farooqi, A.&F. Serenius. 2005. Outcomeafter pretermbirth. Annales Nestle 63: 39-56.
12. Benton,A.L. 1940.Mental development of prematurely born children. Am. J. Orthopsychiatry 10: 719-746.
13. Hess, J.H. 1953. Experiences gained in a thirty year study of prematurely born infants. Pediatrics 11: 425-434.
14. Vohr, B.R. 2001. Neonatal follow-up programs in the new millennium. NeoReviews 11: 241-248.
15. Lubchenco, L.O., F.A. Horner, L.H. Reed, et al. 1963. Sequelae of premature birth. Evaluation of premature infants of low birth weights at ten years of age. Am. J. Dis. Child 106: 101-115.
16. Kinsey, V.E. 1956. Retrolental fibroplasia: cooperative study of retrolental fibroplasia and the use of oxygen. AMA Arch. Ophthalmol. 56: 481-543.
17. Allen, M.C. 2002. Pretermoutcomes research: a critical component of neonatal intensive care. Ment. Retard.Dev.Disabil. Res. Rev. 8: 221-233.
18. Drillien, C.M. 1958. Growth and development in a group of children of very low birth weight. Arch. Dis. Child. 33: 10-18.
19. Lorenz, J.M. 2001. The outcome of extreme prematurity. Semin. Perinatol. 25: 348-359.
20. Evans, D.J. & M.I. Levene. 2001. Evidence of selection bias in preterm survival studies: a systematic review. Arch. Dis. Child Fetal Neonatal. Ed. 84: F79-F84.
21. Costeloe, K., E. Hennessy, A.T. Gibson, et al. 2000. The EPICure Study: outcomes to discharge from hospital for infants born at the threshold of viability. Pediatrics 106: 659-671.
22. Costeloe,K., E.Draper, J.Myles&E.Hennesy. 2008.EPICure 2: Survival and early morbidity of extremely preterm babies in England: changes since 1995. Arch. Dis. Child. 93: A33-A34.
23. Vanhaesebrouck, P., K. Allegaert, J. Bottu, et al.; Extremely PretermInfants in Belgium Study. 2004. The EPIBEL Study: outcomes to discharge from hospital for extremely preterm infants in Belgium. Pediatrics 114: 663-675.
24. Larroque, B., G. Bréart, M. Kaminski, et al.; the EPIPAGE Study Group. 2004. Arch. Dis. Child Fetal Neonatal. Ed. 89: F139-F144.
25. The Swedish Medical Birth Registry. The National Board of health and welfare. www.sos.se/epc.
26. Fanaroff, A.A., M. Hack & M.C. Walsh. 2003. The NICHD neonatal research network: changes in practice and outcomes during the first 15 years. Semin. Perinatol. 27: 281-287.
27. Serenius, F., U. Ewald, A. Farooqi, et al. 2004. Short-term outcome after active perinatal management at 23-25 weeks of gestation. A study from two Swedish perinatal centres. Part 3: neonatal morbidity. Acta Paediatr. 93: 1090-1097.
28. Chan, K., A. Ohlsson, A. Synnes, et al.; Canadian Neonatal Network. 2001. Survival, morbidity, and resource use of infants of 25 weeks gestational age or less. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 185: 220-226.
29. Wood, N.S., K. Costeloe, A.T. Gibson, et al.; EPICure Study Group. 2003. The EPICure study: growth and associated problems in children born at 25 weeks of gestational age or less. Arch. Dis. Child Fetal Neonatal. Ed. 88: F492-F500.
30. Hack, M., M. Schluchter, L. Cartar, et al. 2003. Growth of very low birth weight infants to age 20 years. Pediatrics 112: e30-e38.
31. Doyle, L.W. 2000. Growth and respiratory health in adolescence of the extremely low-birth weight survivor. Clin. Perinatol. 27: 421-432.
32. Bayley, N. 1993. Bayley Scores of Infant Development. 2nd ed. The Psychological Corporation. San Antonio, TX.
33. Wood, N.S., N.Marlow, K. Costeloe, et al. 2000. Neurologic and developmental disability after extremely preterm birth. EPICure Study Group.N. Engl. J. Med. 343: 378-384.
34. Marlow, N., D. Wolke, M.A. Bracewell & M. Samara; EPICure Study Group. 2005. Neurologic and developmental disability at six years of age after extremely pretermbirth. N. Engl. J. Med. 352: 9-19.
35. Hack, M., D. Wilson-Costello, H. Friedman, et al. 2000. Neurodevelopment and predictors of outcomes of children with birth weights of less than 1000 g: 1992-1995. Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 154: 725-731.
36. OShea, T.M., K.L. Klinepeter, D.J. Goldstein, et al. 1997. Survival and developmental disability in infants with birth weights of 501 to 800 grams, born between 1979 and 1994. Pediatrics 100: 982-986.
37. Doyle, L.W.; Victorian Infant Collaborative Study Group. 2004. Neonatal intensive care at borderline viability-is it worth it? Early Hum. Dev. 80: 103-113.
38. Larroque, B., P.Y. Ancel, S. Marret, et al.; EPIPAGE Study Group. 2008. Neurodevelopmental disabilities and special care of 5-year-old children born before 33 weeks of gestation (the EPIPAGE study): a longitudinal cohort study. Lancet 371: 813-820.