Lesion characteristics and coronary stent selection with computed tomographic coronary angiography: A pilot investigation comparing CTA, QCA and IVUS

Journal of Invasive Cardiology

Volumn 22, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 328-334

  Kass, Malek ^a   Glover, Christopher A ^a   Labinaz, Marino ^a   So, Derek Y F ^a   Chen, Li ^a   Yam, Yeung ^a   Chow, Benjamin J W ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA HEART INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

CT coronary angiography; intravascular ultrasound; percutaneous coronary intervention; stent prescription

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTERY DIAMETER; ARTERY LESION; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; CORONARY STENT; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND; MALE; OBSERVATION; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PILOT STUDY; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY;

AGED; ANGIOPLASTY, BALLOON, CORONARY; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY DISEASE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PILOT PROJECTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STENTS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL;

EID: 77957049654     PISSN: 10423931     EISSN: 15572501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Kuntz RE, Gibson CM, Nobuyoshi M, Baim DS. Generalized model of restenosis after conventional balloon angioplasty, stenting and directional atherectomy. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;21:15-25.
2. Smith SC Jr, Feldman TE, Hirshfeld JW Jr, et al. ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 Guideline Update for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention-Summary Article: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:216-235.
3. Mak KH, Belli G, Ellis SG, Moliterno DJ. Subacute stent thrombosis: Evolving issues and current concepts. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;27:494-503.
4. Moussa I, Di Mario C, Reimers B, et al. Subacute stent thrombosis in the era of intravascular ultrasound-guided coronary stenting without anticoagulation: Frequency, predictors and clinical outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;29:6-12.
5. Kastrati A, Schömig A, Elezi S, et al. Predictive factors of restenosis after coronary stent placement. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;30:1428-1436.
6. van Werkum JW, Heestermans AA, Zomer AC, et al. Predictors of coronary stent thrombosis: The Dutch Stent Thrombosis Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53:1399-1409.
7. Stone GW, Grines CL, Cox DA, et al. Comparison of angioplasty with stenting, with or without abciximab, in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2002;346:957-966.
8. Muhlestein JB, Anderson JL, Cui C, et al. Improved long-term survival associated with stent deployment during percutaneous coronary interventions: Results from a registry of 3399 patients. Am Heart J 2005;150:182-187.
9. Serruys PW, de Jaegere P, Kiemeneij F, et al. A comparison of balloon-expandablestent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. BENESTENT Study Group. N Engl J Med 1994;331:489-495.
10. Fischman DL, Leon MB, Baim DS, et al. A randomized comparison of coronarystent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease. Stent Restenosis Study Investigators. N Engl J Med 1994;331:496-501.
11. Versaci F, Gaspardone A, Tomai F, et al. A comparison of coronary-artery stenting with angioplasty for isolated stenosis of the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery. N Engl J Med 1997;336:817-822.
12. Raff GL, Goldstein JA. Coronary angiography by computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:1830-1833.
13. Mintz GS, Nissen SE, Anderson WD, et al. ACC clinical expert consensus document on standards for the acquisition, measurement and reporting of intravascular ultrasound studies: A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents (Committee to Develop a Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Standards for Acquisition, Measurement and Reporting of Intravascular Ultrasound Studies [IVUS]). J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37:1478-1492.
14. Ellis SG, Vandormael MG, Cowley MJ, et al. Coronary morphologic and clinical determinants of procedural outcome with angioplasty for multivessel coronary disease. Circulation 1990;82:1193-1202.
15. Brown BG, Bolson EL, Dodge HT. Quantitative computer techniques for analyzing coronary arteriograms. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 1986;28:403-418.
16. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;327:307-310.
17. Mudra H, di Mario C, de Jaegere P, et al. Randomized comparison of coronary stent implantation under ultrasound or angiographic guidance to reduce stent restenosis (OPTICUS Study). Circulation 2001;104:1343-1349.
18. Leber AW, Knez A, von Ziegler F, et al. Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: A comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:147-154.
19. Caussin C, Larchez C, Ghostine S, et al. Comparison of coronary minimal lumen area quantification by sixty-four-slice computed tomography versus intravascular ultrasound for intermediate stenosis. Am J Cardiol 2006;98:871-876.
20. Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hermann F, et al. Estimated radiation dose associated with cardiac CT angiography. JAMA 2009;301:500-507.
21. Maruyama T, Takada M, Hasuike Y, et al. Radiation dose reduction and coronary assessability of prospective electrocardiogram-gated computed tomography coronary angiography: Comparison with retrospective electrocardiogram-gated helical scan. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:1450-1455.
22. Bischoff B, Hein F, Meyer T, et al. Impact of a reduced tube voltage on CT angiography and radiation dose: Results of the PROTECTION I study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;2:940-946.
23. Curry SH, Lopez LM, Lambert CR, et al. Plasma concentrations and hemodynamic effects of intravenous, sublingual, and aerosolized nitroglycerin in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization. Biopharmaceutics & Drug Disposition 1993;14:107-118.
24. Pfister M, Seiler C, Fleisch M, et al. Nitrate induced coronary vasodilatation: Differential effects of sublingual application by capsule or spray. Heart 1998;80:365-369.