Assessing the efficacy of the calendar method with oklahoma city arrestees

Journal of Crime and Justice

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 117-131

  Yacoubian, George S ^a  

^a McFarland Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77957018863     PISSN: 0735648X     EISSN: 21589119     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0735648X.2003.9721173     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Akers, R. L., Massey, J., Clarke, W., and Lauer, R. M., 1983. “Are Self-Reports of Adolescence Deviance Valid? Biochemical Measures, Randomized Response, and the Bogus Pipeline in Smoking Behavior.”. Social Forces, 62: 234–251.
2. Anglin, M. D., Hser, Y., and Chou, C., 1994. “Reliability and Validity of Retrospective Behavioral Self-Report By Narcotics Addicts.”. Evaluation Review, 17 (1): 91–108.
3. Breslin, C, Sobell, L. C., Sobell, M. B., Buchan, G., and Kwan, E., 1996. “Aftercare Telephone Contacts with Problem Drinkers Can Serve a Clinical and Research Function.”. Addiction, 91 (9): 1359–1364.
4. Campanelli, P. C., Dielman, T. E., and Shope, J. T., 1987. “Validity of Adolescents’ Self-Reports of Alcohol Use and Misuse Using a Bogus Pipeline Procedure.”. Adolescence, 22 (85): 7–22.
5. Fendrich, M., and Xu, Y., 1994. “Validity of Drug Use Reports from Juvenile Arrestees.”. International Journal of the Addictions, 29 (8): 971–985.
6. Fendrich, M., Johnson, T. P., Sudman, S., Wislar, J. S., and Spiehler, V., 1999. “Validity of Drug Use Reporting in a High-Risk Community Sample: A Comparison of Cocaine and Heroin Survey Reports with Hair Tests.”. American Journal of Epidemiology, 149 (10): 955–962.
7. Freedman, D., Thornton, A., Camburn, D., Alwin, D., and Young-DeMarco, L., 1988. “The Life-History Calendar: A Technique for Collecting Retrospective Data.”. Sociological Methodology, 18: 37–68.
8. Harrison, L. D., 1995. “The Validity of Self-Reported Data on Drug Use.”. Journal of Drug Issues, 25: 91–111.
9. Hser, Y., 1997. “Self-Reported Drug Use: Results of Selected Empirical Investigations of Validity.”. NIDA Research Monograph, 167: 320–343.
10. Hubbard, R. L., Marsden, M. E., and Allison, M., 1984. Reliability and Validity of TOPS Data., Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute.
11. Lu, N. T., Taylor, B. G., and Riley, K J., 2000. “The Validity of Adult Arrestee Self-Reports of Crack Cocaine.”. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 27 (3): 399–407.
12. Magura, S., and Kang, S., 1996. “Validity of Self-Reported Drug Use in High-Risk Populations: A Meta-Analytical Review.”. Substance Abuse and Misuse, 31: 1131–1153.
13. Magura, S., and Kang, S., 1997. “ The Validity of Self-Reported Cocaine Use in Two High-Risk Populations. ”. In The Validity of Self-Reported Drug Use: Improving the Accuracy of Survey Estimates, Edited by: Harrison, L., and Hughes, A., Rockville, MD: National Institute of Drug Abuse.
14. Mieczkowski, T., Barzelay, D., Gropper, B., and Wish, E. D., 1991. “Concordance of Three Measures of Cocaine Use in an Arrestee Population: Hair, Urine, and Self-Report.”. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 23: 241–246.
15. Morral, A. R., McCaffrey, D., and Iguchi, M. Y., 2000. “Hardcore Drug Users Claim To Be Occasional Users: Drug Use Frequency Underreporting.”. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 57 (3): 193–202.
16. National Institute of Justice. 2000. 1999 Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Annual Report., Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice.
17. Nurco, D., Bonito, A., Lerner, M., and Baiter, M., 1975. “Studying Addicts Over Time: Methodology and Preliminary Findings.”. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 2 (2): 183–196.
18. Riley, K. J., Lu, N. T., Meeker, J. E., Lo, P., Former, N., and Taylor, B. G., 2001. “Monitoring the Crack Epidemic Through Urine Testing: Establishment of Routine Detection Methods.”. Addiction Biology, 6: 83–95.
19. Rosenfeld, R., and Decker, S., 1993. “Discrepant Values, Correlated Measures: Cross-Cities and Longitudinal Comparisons of Self-Reports and Urine Tests of Cocaine Use Among Arrestees.”. Journal of Criminal Justice, 21: 223–230.
20. Rubin, D. C., 1986. Autobiographical Memory., New York: Cambridge University Press.
21. Sobell, L. C., and Sobell, M. B., 1992. “ Timeline Follow-Back: A Technique for Assessing Self-Reported Alcohol Consumption. ”. In Measuring Alcohol Consumption: Psychosocial and Biochemical Methods, Edited by: Litten, R. Z., and Allen, J. P., Totowa, NJ: Humana Press.
22. Sobell, L. C., Sobell, M. B., Leo, G. I., and Cancilla, A., 1988. “Reliability of a Timeline Method: Assessing Normal Drinkers’ Reports of Recent Drinking and a Comparative Evaluation Across Several Populations.”. British Journal of Addiction, 83 (4): 393–402.
23. Tourangeau, R., Smith, T. W., and Rasinski, K., 1997. “Motivation to Report Sensitive Behaviors on Surveys: Evidence from a Bogus Pipeline Experiment.”. Journal of Applied Psychology, 27 (3): 209–222.
24. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 1997. The National Treatment Improvement Evaluation Study (NTIES) Final Report., Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
25. Wagenaar, A. C., Komro, K. A., McGovem, P., Williams, C. L., and Perry, C. L., 1993. “Effects of a Saliva Test Pipeline Procedure on Adolescent Self-Reported Alcohol Use.”. Addiction, 88: 199–208.
26. Wish, E. D., and Gropper, B. A., 1990. “ Drug Testing By the Criminal Justice System: Methods, Research, and Applications. ”. In Drugs and Crime: A Review of Research, Edited by: Tonry, M. J., and Wilson, J. Q., Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
27. Wish, E. D., Hoffman, J. A., and Nemes, S., 1997. “ The Validity of Self-Reports of Drug Use at Treatment Admission and at Follow-Up: Comparisons with Urinalysis and Hair Assays. ”. In The Validity of Self-Reported Drug Use: Improving the Accuracy of Survey Estimates, Edited by: Harrison, L., and Hughes, A., Rockville, MD: National Institute of Drug Abuse.
28. Wish, E. D., Yacoubian, G., Perez, D. M., and Choyka, J. D., 2000b. Test First and Ask Questions Afterwards: Improving the Validity of Self-Report Drug Use Data by Arrestees., San Francisco, CA: Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Criminology (ASC).
29. Wish, E. D., Gray, T., Sushinsky, J., Yacoubian, G., and Fitzgerald, N., 2000a. “An Experiment to Enhance the Reporting of Drug Use by Arrestees.”. Journal of Drug Issues, 30 (l): 55–76.
30. Yacoubian, G., 2000a. “Reassessing the Need for Urinalysis as a Validation Technique: Correlation Estimates from the Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program.”. Journal of Drug Issues, 30 (2): 323–334.
31. Yacoubian, G., 2000b. “Assessing ADAM's Domain: Past, Present, and Future.”. Contemporary Drug Problems, 27: 121–135.
32. Yacoubian, G., and Wish, E. D., 2001. Using Instant Oral Fluid Tests to Improve the Validity of Self-Report Drug Use Data by Arrestees., Atlanta, GA: Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Criminology (ASC).