Carabid species responses to hybrid poplar plantations in floodplains in France

Forest Ecology and Management

Volumn 260, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 1446-1455

  Elek, Zoltán ^a,b   Dauffy Richard, Emmanuelle ^a   Gosselin, Frédéric ^a  

^a Cemagref   (France)

^b INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE   (Hungary)

Author keywords

Carabidae; Floodplain; France; Hybrid poplar plantation; Quasi Poisson glm; Species response

Indexed keywords

CARABIDAE; FLOOD PLAINS; FRANCE; HYBRID POPLAR PLANTATION; QUASI-POISSON GLM; SPECIES RESPONSE;

BANKS (BODIES OF WATER); BIODIVERSITY; ECOSYSTEMS; LAND USE;

FORESTRY;

ALLUVIAL PLAIN; BEETLE; CANOPY ARCHITECTURE; DECIDUOUS FOREST; FLOODPLAIN; GRASSLAND; HYBRID; LAND USE; PLANT-INSECT INTERACTION; PLANTATION; SPECIES CONSERVATION; SPECIES DIVERSITY; SUCCESSION; TEMPERATE ENVIRONMENT;

ALLUVIUM; BIODIVERSITY; ECOSYSTEMS; FORESTRY; FRANCE; GRASS LANDS; INSECTS; LAND USE; PLANTATIONS; POPULUS;

FRANCE;

CARABIDAE; COLEOPTERA; POPULUS;

EID: 77957013130     PISSN: 03781127     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.07.034     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Allegro G., Sciaky R. Assessing the potential role of ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) as bioindicators in poplar stands, with a newly proposed ecological index (FAI). Forest Ecol. Manag. 2003, 175:275-284.
2. Anonymous, 1810-13. Histoire des arbres forestiers de l'Amérique septentrionale, vol. 4. Paris.
3. Archaux F., Martin H. Hybrid poplar plantations in a floodplain have balanced impacts on farmland and woodland birds. Forest Ecol. Manag. 2009, 257:1474-1479.
4. Baldock D., Beaufoy G., Brouwer F., Godeschalk F. Farming at the Margins 1996, The Hague, London.
5. Bates, D., 2007. lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.99875-9.
6. Berthelot A., Augustin S., Godin J., Decocq G. Biodiversity in poplar plantations in the Picardie region of France. Unasylva (english Ed.) 2005, 221:18-19.
7. Berthelot, A., Chevalier, R., Dauffy-Richard, E., Archaux, F., Gonin, P., Gaudin, S., Duprez, M., 2009. Biodiversité floristique, entomologique et ornithologique des vallées alluviales de Champagne-Ardenne. Rôle de l'antécédent historique et de l'intensité des entretiens des peupleraies, en interaction avec la station et en référence aux habitats forestiers et prairiaux. FCBA, Charrey-sur-Saône (21), 44 p.
8. Bignal E.M., McCracken D.I. Low-intensity farming systems in the conservation of the countryside. J. Appl. Ecol. 1996, 33:413-424.
9. Boesch A., Pellet J., Maibach A. Reconcersion de populicultures et biodiversité. Schweiz. Z. Forstwesen 2007, 158(10):323-330.
10. Bolker B.M., Brooks M.E., Clark C.J., Geange S.W., Poulsen J.R., Stevens M.H., White J.S. Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2009, 24:127-135.
11. Burnham K.P., Anderson D.R. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information Theoretic Approach 2002, Springer-Verlag, New York, USA.
12. Clarke K.R. Non-parametric multivariate analysis of changes in community structure. Australas. Ecol. 1993, 18:117-143.
13. Colwell, R.K., 2007. Estimates: statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. (User's Guide) Version 8.0.
14. Colwell R.K., Mao C.X., Chang J. Interpolating, extrapolating, and comparing incidence-based species accumulation curves. Ecology 2004, 85:2717-2727.
15. Coulon J. Les Bembidiina (Coléoptères Carabidae Trechinae) de la faune de France. Clés d'identification commentées (Première partie). Bulletin Mensuel de la Société linnéenne de Lyon 2003, 72(8):256-272.
16. Coulon J. Les Bembidiina (Coléoptères Carabidae Trechinae) de la faune de France. Clés d'identification commentées (Deuxième partie). Bulletin Mensuel de la Société Linnéenne de Lyon 2004, 73(4):163-180.
17. Coulon J. Les Bembidiina (Coléoptères Carabidae Trechinae) de la faune de France. Clés d'identification commentées (Troisième partie). Bulletin Mensuel de la Société Linnéenne de Lyon 2004, 73(8):305-325.
18. Décamps H., Fortuné M., Gazelle F., Pautou G. Historical influence of man on the riparian dynamics in a fluvial landscape. Landscape Ecol. 1988, 1:163-173.
19. Décamps H. River margins and environmental change. Ecol. Appl. 1993, 3(3):441-445.
20. Denux O., Augustin S., Berthelot A. Biodiversité des Carabidae dans les peupleraies picardes (Coleoptera). L'Entomologiste 2007, 63:243-256.
21. du Bus de Warnaffe G., Lebrun P. Effects of forest management on carabid beetles in Belgium: implications for biodiversity conservation. Biol. Conserv. 2004, 118:219-234.
22. Ellenberg, H., 1974. Zeigerwerte der Gefäßpflanzen Mitteleuropas. Scripta Geobotanica IX. Verlag.
23. Geilen N., Jochens H., Krebs L., Muler S., Pedroli B., Van Der Sluis T., Van Looy K., Van Rooij S. Integration of ecological aspects in flood protection strategies: defining an ecological minimum. River Res. Appl. 2004, 20:269-283.
24. Godreau V., Bornette G., Frochot B., Amoros C., Castella E., Oertli B., Chambaud F., Oberti D., Craney E. Biodiversity in the floodplain of Saône: a global approach. Biodivers. Conserv. 1999, 8:839-864.
25. Hanowski J.M., Niemi G.J., Christian D.C. Influence of within-plantation heterogeneity and surrounding landscape composition on avian communities in hybrid poplar plantations. Conserv. Biol. 1997, 11:936-944.
26. Hartley M. Rationale and methods for conserving biodiversity in plantation forests. Forest Ecol. Manag. 2002, 155:81-95.
27. Hastings W.K. Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications. Biometrika 1970, 57:97-109.
28. Hurka, K., 1996. Carabidae of the Czech and Slovak Republics. Kabourek, Zlin.
29. Hurlbert S.H. Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecol. Monogr. 1984, 54:187-211.
30. Inventaire Forestier National, 1999. Département de l'Aube. Troisième inventaire forestier du département (1994). Nogent sur Vernisson, Inventaire Forestier National. http://www.ifn.fr/spip/IMG/pdf/IFN_10_3_AUBE.pdf.
31. Inventaire Forestier National, 2001. Département de la Marne. Troisième inventaire forestier du département (1997). Nogent sur Vernisson, Inventaire Forestier National. http://www.ifn.fr/spip/IMG/pdf/IFN_51_3_MARNE.pdf.
32. Irmler U. Environmental characteristics of ground beetle assemblages in northern German forests as basis for an expert system. Z. Ökologie u. Naturschutz 2000, 8:227-237.
33. Jeannel, R., 1941. Faune de France. Coléoptères carabiques. Iere partie. Office Central de Faunistique, Paris.
34. Jeannel, R., 1942. Faune de France Coléoptères Carabiques. Deuxième partie. Office Central de Faunistique, Paris, pp. 573-1173.
35. Jeannel, R., 1949. Faune de France - Coléoptères Carabiques. Supplément. Office Central de Faunistique, Paris.
36. Jukes M.R., Peace A.J., Ferris R. Carabid beetle communities associated with coniferous plantations in Britain: the influence of site, ground vegetation and stand structure. Forest Ecol. Manag. 2001, 148:271-286.
37. Koivula, M., 2001. Carabid beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in boreal managed forests - meso-scale ecological patterns in relation to modern forestry. Doctoral thesis, University of Helsinki, Finland.
38. Levin S.A. The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology 1992, 73:1943-1967.
39. Lindroth C.H. Handbooks for the identification of British insects. Coleoptera Carabidae 1974, Society of London, London.
40. Lövei G.L., Magura T., Tóthmérész B. The influence of matrix and edges on species richness patterns of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in habitat islands. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 2006, 15:283-289.
41. Lövei G.L., Sunderland K.D. Ecology and behaviour of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1996, 41:231-256.
42. Metropolis H., Rosenbluth A.W., Rosenbluth M.N., Teller A.H., Teller E. Equations of state calculations by fast computing machines. J. Chem. Phys. 1953, 21:1087-1092.
43. Ministère de l'Agriculture et de la Pêche, 2006. Les indicateurs de gestion durable des forêts françaises - Edition 2005. MAP, Paris.
44. Moore S.E., Allen H.L. Plantation forestry. Maintaining Biodiversity in Forest Ecosystems 1999, 400-433. Cambridge University Press, New York. M.L. Hunter (Ed.).
45. Niemelä J. Carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) and habitat fragmentation: a review. Eur. J. Entomol. 2001, 98(2):127-132.
46. Oksanen, J., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., O'Hara, B., Henry, M., Stevens H., 2007. Vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 1.8-8. , http://r-forge.r-project.org/projects/vegan/.
47. Oxbrough A., Irwin S., Kelly T.C., O'Halloran J. Ground-dwelling invertebrates in reforested conifer plantations. Forest Ecol. Manag. 2010, 259:2111-2121.
48. Historical Change of Large Alluvial Rivers: Western Europe 1989, John Wiley ans Sons, Chichester. G.E. Petts, H. Möller, A.L. Roux (Eds.).
49. R Development Core Team, 2007. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. http://www.r-project.org/.
50. Richard, E., 2004. Response of carabid Coleoptera communities to conversion into even-aged high oak forest: ecological and methodological aspects. PhD thesis, Sciences de l'Environnement, ENGREF, Paris. pp. 446-164.
51. Richard, E., Gosselin, F., Lhonoré, J., 2004. Short-term and mid-term response of ground beetle communities (Coleoptera, Carabidae) to disturbance by regeneration felling. In: Honnay, O., et al. (eds) Forest Biodiversity: Lessons from History for Conservation. IUFRO Res. Ser. CAB International, Leuven (Belgium), pp. 179-192.
52. Rouquette J.R., Posthumus H., Gowing D.J.G., Tucker G., Dawson Q.L., Hess T.M., Morris J. Valuing nature-conservation interest on agricultural floodplains. J. Appl. Ecol. 2009, 46:289-296.
53. Sapia M., Lövei G.L., Elek Z. Effects of varying sampling effort on the observed diversity of carabids (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Entomol. Fennica 2006, 17:345-350.
54. Taboada A., Kotze D.J., Tarrega R., Salgado J.M. Traditional forest management: do carabid beetles respond to human-created vegetation structures in an oak mosaic landscape?. For. Ecol. Manag. 2006, 237:436-449.
55. Taboada A., Tarrega R., Calvo L., Marcos E., Marcos J.A., Salgado J.M. Plant and carabid beetle species diversity in relation to forest type and structural heterogeneity. Eur. J. Forest Res. 2008, 1-15.
56. Taglianti, V., 2008. Fauna Europaea: Family Carabidae. Fauna Europaea version 1.1. http://www.faunaeur.org/.
57. Ulrich W., Buszko J., Czarnecki A. The contribution of poplar plantations to regional diversity of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in agricultural landscapes. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 2004, 41:501-512.
58. Venables W.N., Ripley B.D. Modern Applied Statistics with S 2002, Springer-Verlag, Berlin. fourth ed.
59. Ver Hoef J.M., Boveng P.L. Quasi-poisson vs. negative binomial regression: how should we model overdispersed count data?. Ecology 2007, 88:2766-2772.
60. Wade P.R. Bayesian methods in conservation biology. Conserv. Biol. 2000, 14:1308-1316.
61. Warriner M.D., Nebecker E., Tucker S.A. Beetle Diversity in an Eastern Cottonwood (Populus deltoides Bartr.) Plantation and Adjacent Bottomland Hardwood Forest in Southeastern Arkansas. J. Ark. Acad. Sci. 2002, 56:220-226.
62. Ward J.V., Tockner K., Scheimer F. Biodiversity of floodplain river ecosystems: ecotones and connectivity. Regul. River 1999, 15:125-139.
63. Yu X.D., Luo T.H., Zhou H.Z. Distribution of carabid beetles among 40-year-old regenerating plantations and 100-year-old naturally regenerated forests in Southwestern China. Forest Ecol. Manag. 2008, 255:2617-2625.