European rail reform and passenger services - the next steps

Research in Transportation Economics

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 204-211

  Nash, Chris ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77957003753     PISSN: 07398859     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.retrec.2010.07.025     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Adler N., Nash C.A., Pels E. High speed rail and air competition: the case of the European Union Funding final symposium. Available at:. http://www.econ.kuleuven.be/projects/funding/events.htm.
2. Alexandersson G. Rail privatisation and competitive tendering in Europe. Built Environment 2009, 35(1):37-52.
3. Alexandersson G., Hulten S. Competitive tendering of regional and interregional rail services in Sweden. European conference of ministers of transport competitive tendering for rail services 2007, ECMT, Paris.
4. Beckers T., Haunerland F., von Hirschhausen C., Walter M. Long-distance passenger rail services in Europe: Market access models and implications for Germany 2009, ITF Discussion Paper No. 2009-22, OECD, Paris.
5. Brenck H., Peter M. Experience with competitive tendering in Germany. European conference of ministers of transport (2007) competitive tendering for rail services 2007, ECMT, Paris.
6. Commission of the European Communities (2006) Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the implementation of the first railway package, Brussels: COM (2006) 189 final.
7. Commission of the European Communities Communication from the commission. Community guidelines on State aid for railway undertakings 2008, (Brussels).
8. Commission of the European Communities (2008b) Communication from the Commission - Multi-annual contracts for Rail Infrastructure Quality, Brussels: COM (2008) 54 Final.
9. Community of European Railways Public service transport in the European union: An overview 2005, (Brussels).
10. ECORYS (2005) Ex post evaluation of a sample of projects co-financed by the cohesion fund 1993-2002 Synthesis report for the European Commission, DG Regional Policy.
11. European Conference of Ministers of Transport Competitive tendering for rail services 2007, ECMT, Paris.
12. Friebel G., Ivaldi M., Vibes C. Railway (De) regulation: A European efficiency comparison 2005, CEPR Discussion Paper 319, Centre for Economic Policy Research, London.
13. GRACE Deliverable 7. Generalization of Marginal Social Cost Estimates 2008, http://www.grace-eu.org/.
14. Griffiths T. On rail competition: The impact of open access entry on the Great Britain rail market 2009, Paper presented to the international conference on competition and ownership in land passenger transport, Delft.
15. Growitsch C., Wetzel H. Testing for economies of scope in European Railways: an efficiency analysis. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 2009, 43(1):1-24.
16. IBM Rail Regulation in Europe: Comparison of the status quo of the regulation of rail network access in the EU-25 countries, Switzerland, and Norway 2006, IBM, Zurich.
17. International Transport Forum Charges for the Use of Rail Infrastructure 2008, Paris.
18. Kain P. The pitfalls in competitive tendering: Experience in Australia and Britain in European conference of ministers of transport (2007) competitive tendering for rail services 2007, ECMT, Paris.
19. Merkert R. The measurement of transaction costs in railways 2009, Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Leeds.
20. Nash C.A. Passenger railway reform in the last 20 years-European experience. Research in Transportation Economics 2008, 22(1):61-70.
21. Nash C.A., Matthews B. European transport policy - Progress and prospects. A report for CER 2009, CER, Brussels.
22. Nash C.A., Matthews B., Thompson L.S. Railway reform and charges for the use of infrastructure 20 April 2005, ECMT, Paris.
23. Preston J.M., Holvad T and Rajé F (2002) Track access charges and rail competition: a comparative analysis of Britain and Sweden, paper presented at the European transport conference, Cambridge.
24. Preston J., Wardman M., Whelan G. An analysis of the potential for on-track competition in the British passenger rail industry. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 1999, 33(part 1):77-94.
25. Proost S, Dunkerley F, Adler N, Broecker J & Mackie P (2007) Funding Infrastructure: Guidelines for Europe, Final Report of the FUNDING Project, co-funded by the European Commission within the Sixth Framework Programme, Leuven.
26. RebelGroup The impacts of the 2004 enlargement in the area of transport, prepared for the European Commission (DG TREN) in association with COWI and Transport & Mobility Leuven 2007, (Rotterdam).
27. Rus G.de., Nash C.A. In what circumstances is investment in HSR worthwhile? 2007, ITS working paper no 590, University of Leeds.
28. Sanchez-Borras M., Nash C., Abrantes P., Lopez-Pita A. Rail access charges and the competitiveness of high speed trains. Transport Policy 2010, 17:102-109.
29. Smith A.S.J., Nash C.A., Wheat P. Passenger rail franchising in Britain: has it been a success?. International Journal of Transport Economics 2009, 36(1):33-62.
30. Tanczos K., Bessenyei G. East European rail: the state of the network. Built Environment 2009, 35(No 1).
31. Van Dijk Tendering and decentralisation of regional rail passenger services in the Netherlands, 1997-2005 in European Conference of Ministers of Transport (2007) Competitive tendering for rail services 2007, ECMT, Paris.
32. Winston, Clifford The United states: private and deregulated. Competition in the Railway industry: An international comparative analysis 2006, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham. J. Gomez-Ibanez, G. de Rus (Eds.).