Clinical value of the sepsis bundles and modes of implementation;Sepsis Klinischer Stellenwert der Sepsisbündel und Möglichkeiten der Implementierung

Anasthesiologie Intensivmedizin Notfallmedizin Schmerztherapie

Volumn 45, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 566-571

  Toussaint, Susanne ^a   Gerlach, Herwig ^a  

^a VIVANTES KLINIKUM NEUKÖLLN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DISEASE SEVERITY; FUNDING; HOSPITAL PERSONNEL; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; MORTALITY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; REVIEW; SEPSIS; TRAINING;

DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; GERMANY; HUMANS; INTENSIVE CARE; SEPSIS;

EID: 77956969749     PISSN: 09392661     EISSN: 14391074     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1265749     Document Type: Review

References (22)

1. Levy MM, Pronovost PJ, Dellinger PR et al. Sepsis change bundles: Converting guidelines into meaningful change in behaviour and clinical outcome. Crit Care Med 2004 32 595-597
2. Dellinger RP et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008. Crit Care Med 2008 36 296-327
3. Joint Commission Perspectives on Patient Safety: Raising the Bar with Bundles. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. www.ingentaconnect.com/content/jcaho/jcpps/2006/00000006/00000004/art00003 [Stand 23.4.2010] 2006 6
4. Dellinger RP, Carlet JM, Masur H. Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock. Intensive Care Med 2004 30 536-555 (Pubitemid 38541501)
5. Barochia AV, Cui X, Vitberg D et al. Bundled care for septic shock: An analysis of clinical trials. Crit Care Med 2010 38 668-678
6. Nguyen HB et al. Implementation of a bundle of quality indicators for the early management of severe sepsis and septic shock is associated with decreased mortality. Crit Care Med 2007 35 1105-1112
7. Kumar A, Roberts D, Wood KE et al. Duration of hypotension before initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy is the critical determinant of survival in human septic shock. Crit Care Med 2006 34 1589-1596
8. Levy MM, Fink MP, Marshall JC et al. 2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS International Sepsis Definitions Conference. Crit Care Med 2003 31 1250-1256
9. www.ihi.org/IHI/Topics/CriticalCare/Sepsis [Stand 23.4.2010]
10. www.divi-org.de/fileadmin/pdfs/Leitlinien/Sepsis-Leitlinie-20104.pdf [Stand 30.5.2010]
11. Ferrer R, Artigas A, Levy MM et al. Improvement in process of care and outcome after a multicenter severe sepsis educational program in Spain. JAMA 2008 299 2294-2303
12. Ferrer R, Artigas A, Suarez D et al. Effectiveness of treatments for severe sepsis: a prospective, multicenter, observational study. Am J Resp Crit Care 2009 180 861-866
13. Zambon M, Ceola M, Almeida-de-Castro R, Gullo A, Vincent JL. Implementation of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for severe sepsis and septic shock: We could go faster. J Crit Care 2008 23 455-460
14. Foy R, Walker A, Ramsay C et al. Theory-based identification of barriers to quality-improvement: induced abortion care. Int J Qual Health Care 2005 17 147-155
15. Kello J et al. Why do physicians not follow evidence-based guidelines for preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia? A survey based on the opinions of an international panel of intensivists. Chest 2002 122 656-661
16. Sinuff T et al. Clinical practice guidelines in the intensive care unit: a survey of Canadian clinicians' attitudes. Can J Anesth 2007 54 728-736
17. Reade MC et al. Variability in management of early severe sepsis. Emerg Med J 2010 27 110-115
18. Carter C. Implementing the severe sepsis care bundles outside the ICU by outreach. Nurs Crit Care 2007 12 225-230
19. McGaughey J et al. Outreach and Early Warning Systems (EWS) for the prevention of intensive care admission and death of critically ill adult patients on general hospital wards. The Cochrane Library 2007 4
20. Levy MM et al. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign: results of an international guideline-based performance improvement program targeting severe sepsis. Intensive Care Med 2010 36 222-231
21. Finfer S. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign: Robust evaluation and high-quality primary research is still needed. Crit Care Med 2010 38 683-684
22. Blomkains AL et al. Guideline implementation research: exploring the gap between evidence and practice in the CRUSADE quality improvement initiative. Academic Emergency Medicine 2007 14 949-954