Reproductive partitioning in sea level quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) cultivars

Field Crops Research

Volumn 118, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 94-101

  Bertero, H D ^a   Ruiz, R A ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE BUENOS AIRES   (Argentina)

Author keywords

Crop growth; Dry matter partitioning; Modeling; Panicle stem relationship; Partitioning coefficients

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL MODELING; BIOACCUMULATION; CROP YIELD; CULTIVAR; DICOTYLEDON; DRY MATTER; GROWTH RATE; PHYTOMASS; TRADE-OFF;

ARGENTINA; PAMPAS;

CHENOPODIUM QUINOA;

EID: 77956966329     PISSN: 03784290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2010.04.009     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Barghava A., Shukla S., Ohri D. Genetic variability and interrelationship among various morphological and quality traits in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Field Crops Res. 2007, 101:104-116.
2. Benlhabib O., Atifi M., Jellen E.N., Jacobsen S.E. The introduction of a new peruvian crop " quinoa" to a rural community in Morocco. Proceedings of the VIIIth European Society of Agronomy Meeting 2004, 881-882.
3. Bertero H.D., Ruiz R.A. Determination of seed number in sea level quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) cultivars. Eur. J. Agron. 2008, 28:186-194.
4. Bertero H.D., King R.W., Hall A.J. Modelling photoperiod and temperature responses of flowering in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa W.). Field Crops Res. 1999, 63:19-34.
5. Bertero H.D., de la Vega A.J., Correa G., Jacobsen S.E., Mujica A. Genotype and genotype-by-environment interaction effects for grain yield and grain size of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) as revealed by pattern analysis of international multi-environment trials. Field Crops Res. 2004, 89:299-318.
6. Berti M., Wilckens R., Hevia F., Serri H., Vidal I., Mendez C. Fertilización nitrogenada en quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Cien. Inv. Agr. 2000, 27:81-90.
7. Bindraban P.S., Sayre K.D., Solis-Moya E. Identifying factors that determine kernel number in wheat. Field Crops Res. 1998, 58:223-234.
8. Blum A. Improving wheat grain filling under stress by reserve mobilization. Euphytica 1998, 100:77-83.
9. Christensen S.A., Pratt D.B., Pratt C., Nelson P.T., Stevens M.R., Jellen E.N., Coleman C.E., Fairbanks D.J., Bonifacio A., Maughan P.J. Assessment of genetic diversity in the USDA and CIP-FAO international nursery collections of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) using microsatellite markers. Plant Genet. Res 2007, 5:82-95.
10. Dike G. How to avoid bad statistics. Field Crops Res. 1997, 51:165-187.
11. Egli D.B., Guffy R.D., Leggett J.E. Partitioning of assimilate between vegetative and reproductive growth in Soybean. Agron. J. 1985, 77:917-922.
12. Etchevers J., Avila P. Efecto de la fecha de siembra, distancia entre surcos y ecotipos sobre el rendimiento y comportamiento de quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) en Chillán. Cien. Inv. Agr. 1981, 8:19-26.
13. Evans L.T. Crop Evolution, Adaptation and Yield 1993, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
14. García M., Raes D., Jacobsen S.E., Michel T. Agroclimatic constraints for rainfed agriculture in the Bolivian Altiplano. J. Arid Environ. 2007, 71:109-121.
15. Geerts S., Raes D., García M., Vacher J., Mamani R., Mendoza J., Huanca R., Morales B., Miranda R., Cusicanqui J., Taboada C. Introducing deficit irrigation to stabilize yields of quinoa. Eur. J. Agron. 2008, 28:427-436.
16. Gonzalez F.G., Slafer G.A., Miralles D.J. Floral development and spike growth as affected by photoperiod during stem elongation in wheat. Field Crops Res. 2003, 81:29-38.
17. Gonzalez F.G., Slafer G.A., Miralles D.J. Photoperiod during stem elongation in wheat: is its impact on fertile floret and grain number determination similar to that of radiation?. Funct. Plant. Biol. 2005, 32:181-188.
18. Gonzalez J.A., Gallardo M., Hilal M., Rosa M., Prado F.E. Physiological responses of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) to drought and waterlogging stresses: dry matter partitioning. Bot. Stud. 2009, 50:35-42.
19. Hall A.J., Rebella C.M., Ghersa C.M., Culot J.P. Field-crop systems of the Pampas. Ecosystems of the World 18. Field Crops Ecosystems 1992, 413-450. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, (Chapter 19). C.J. Pearson (Ed.).
20. Hedden P. The genes of the Green Revolution. Trends Genet. 2003, 19:5-9.
21. Jacobsen S.E., Stolen O. Quinoa-morphology, phenology and prospects for its production as a new crop in Europe. Eur. J. Agron. 1993, 2:19-29.
22. Jacobsen S.E., Jorgensen I., Stolen O. Cultivation of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) under temperate climatic conditions in Denmark. J. Agric. Sci. 1994, 122:47-52.
23. Jandel, TBLCURVE TableCurve 3.0. Curve Fitting Software 1992, Jandel Scientific, Corte Madera, CA.
24. Johnson D.L., Ward S.M. Quinoa. New Crops 1993, 222-227. Wiley, New York. J. Janick, J.E. Simon (Eds.).
25. Kiniry J.R., Tischler C.R., Rosenthal W.D., Gerik T.J. Non structural carbohydrate utilization by sorghum and maize shaded during grain growth. Crop Sci. 1992, 32:131-137.
26. Köppen W. Grundriss der Klimakunde 1931, vol. 12. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 338 pp.
27. López C., Bertero H.D. Efecto de la manipulación de las relaciones fuente-destino sobre el número y el peso de los granos en quínoa. Proceedings of the XXVIth Meeting of the Argentinian Society of Plant Physiology 2006.
28. Ludlow M.M., Muchow R.C. A critical evaluation of traits for improving crop yields in water limited environments. Adv. Agron. 1990, 43:107-153.
29. Maughan P.J., Kolano B.A., Maluszynska J., Coles N.D., Bonifacio A., Rojas J., Coleman C.E., Stevens M.R., Fairbanks D.J., Parkinson S.E., Jellen E.N. Molecular and cytological characterization of ribosomal RNA genes in Chenopodium quinoa and Chenopodium berlandieri. Genome 2006, 49:825-839.
30. Mignone C., Bertero H.D. Identificación del período crítico de determinación del rendimiento en quínoas de nivel del mar. Proceedings of the 1st International Quinoa Congress 2007.
31. Mignone C., Aguirre Castro P., Gómez M.B., Bertero H.D. Genes de enanismo para incrementar el rendimiento potencial en quínoa?. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Ecophysiology Applied to the Study of Yield and Quality Determination in Grain Crops 2007.
32. Moreno-Sotomayor A., Weiss A. Improvements in the simulation of kernel number and grain yield in CERES-Wheat. Field Crops Res. 2004, 88:157-169.
33. Munir H., Basora S.M.A. Introducción de Chenopodium quinoa Willd. en Pakistan. Las perspectives. Proceedings of the IIIIth World Quinua Congress 2010.
34. Pagano E., Maddonni G.A. Intra-specific competition in maize: early established hierarchies differ in plant growth and biomass partitioning to the ear around silking. Field Crops Res. 2007, 101:306-320.
35. Planella M.T., Cornejo L.E., Tagle B. Alero Las Morrenas 1: evidencia de cultígenos entre cazadores recolectores de finales del período arcaico en Chile central. Chungará 2005, 37:59-74.
36. Prystupa P., Savín R., Slafer G.A. Grain number and its relationship with dry matter, N and P in the spikes at heading in response to N×P fertilization in barley. Field Crops Res. 2004, 90:245-254.
37. Risi J., Galwey N.W. Chenopodium grains of the Andes: a crop for the temperate latitudes. New Crops for Food and Industry 1989, Chapman and Hall, New York. G.E. Wickens, N. Haq, P. Day (Eds.).
38. Royo C., Voltas J., Romagosa I. Remobilization of pre-anthesis assimilates to the grain for grain only and dual purpose (forage and grain) triticale. Agron. J. 1999, 91:312-316.
39. Ruiz R.A., Bertero H.D. Estabilidad del índice de cosecha en variedades de quinoa adaptadas a climas templados. Proceedings of the XXVIth Meeting of the Argentinian Society of Plant Physiology 2006.
40. Ruiz R.A., Bertero H.D. Light interception and radiation use efficiency in temperate quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) cultivars. Eur. J. Agron. 2008, 29:144-152.
41. Schulte auf'm Erley G., Kaul G., Kruse M., Aufhammer W. Yield and nitrogen utilization efficiency of the pseudocereals amaranth, quinoa and buckwheat under different nitrogen fertilization. Eur. J. Agron. 2005, 22:95-100.
42. Slafer G.A., Andrade F.H., Satorre E.H. Genetic-improvement effects on pre-anthesis physiological attributes related to wheat grain yield. Field Crops Res. 1990, 23:255-263.
43. Soltani A., Torabi B., Zarei H. Modeling crop yield using a modified harvest index-based approach: application in chickpea. Field Crops Res. 2005, 91:273-285.
44. Tapia M., Alandia S., Cardozo A., Gandarillas H., Mujica A., Ortiz R., Otazu V., Rea J., Zanabria E. Quinoa y Canihua. Cultivos Andinos. Serie libros y materiales educativos 49 1979, IICA, Bogotá, Colombia, 227 pp. M. Tapia (Ed.).
45. Trápani N., Hall A.J., Villalobos F.J. Pre-anthesis partitioning of dry matter in sunflower. Field Crops Res. 1994, 37:235-246.
46. Ujiie K., Sasagawa R., Yamashita A., Isobe K., Ishii R. Agronomic studies on quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) cultivation in Japan. I. Determination of the proper seeding time in the southern Kanto district for good performance of the grain yield. J. Crop Sci. 2007, 76:59-64.
47. Vega C.R.C., Andrade F.H., Sadras V.O. Reproductive partitioning and seed set efficiently in soybean, sunflower and maize. Field Crops Res. 2001, 72:163-175.
48. Wilson H.D. Quinua and relatives (Chenopodium sect. Chenopodium subsect. Cellulata). Econ. Bot. 1990, 44:92-110.