Differential ablation of sensory receptors underlies ototoxin-induced shifts in auditory thresholds of the goldfish (Carassius auratus)

Journal of Applied Toxicology

Volumn 30, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 536-541

  Ramcharitar, John ^a   Selckmann, Gordon Michael ^a  

^a ST MARY'S COLLEGE OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Auditory evoked potentials; Auditory hair cells; Ototoxicity

Indexed keywords

GENTAMICIN;

ARTICLE; AUDITORY THRESHOLD SHIFT; CELL DENSITY; CLINICAL EVALUATION; DISEASE PREDISPOSITION; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; GOLDFISH; HAIR CELL; NONHUMAN; OTOTOXICITY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SACCULUS; SENSORY RECEPTOR; UTRICLE;

ANIMALS; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CELL COUNT; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; GENTAMICINS; GOLDFISH; HAIR CELLS, AUDITORY, INNER; SACCULE AND UTRICLE; TOXICITY TESTS;

CARASSIUS AURATUS;

EID: 77956943204     PISSN: 0260437X     EISSN: 10991263     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jat.1523     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Barros TP, Alderton WK, Reynolds HM, Roach AG, Berghmans S. 2008. Zebrafish: an emerging technology for in vivo pharmacological assessment to identify potential safety liabilities in early drug discovery. Br. J. Pharmacol. 154: 1400-1413.
2. Behra M, Bradsher J, Sougrat R, Gallardo V, Allende ML, Burgess SM. 2009. Phoenix is required for mechanosensory hair cell regeneration in the zebrafish lateral line. PLoS Genet. 5(4): E1000455.
3. Braun CB, Coombs S, Fay RR. 2002. What is the nature of multisensory interaction between octavolateralis sub-systems? Brain Behav. Evol. 59: 162-176. (Pubitemid 34914026)
4. Brignull HR, Raible DW, Stone JS. 2009. Feathers and fins: non-mammalian models for hair cell regeneration. Brain Res. 1277: 12-23.
5. Casper BM, Mann DA. 2007. Dipole hearing measurements in elasmobranch fishes. J. Exp. Biol. 210: 75-81.
6. Chang JSY, Popper AN, Saidel WM. 1992. Heterogeneity of sensory hair cells in a fish ear. J. Comp. Neurol. 324: 621-640.
7. Chiu LL, Cunningham LL, Raible DW, Rubel EW, Ou HC. 2008. Using the zebrafish lateral line to screen for ototoxicity. JARO 9: 178-190.
8. Corwin JT, Oberholtzer JC. 1997. Fish n' chicks: model recipes for hair-cell regeneration? Neuron 19: 951-954.
9. Eimon PM, Rubinstein AL. 2009. The use of in vivo zebrafish assays in drug toxicity screening. Expert Opin. Drug Metabl. Toxicol. 5: 393-401.
10. Fay RR. 1988. Hearing in Vertebrates: a Psychophysics Databook. Hill-Fay Assoc.
11. Fay RR. 2005. Perception of pitch by goldfish. Hear. Res. 205: 7-20.
12. Fay RR. 2009. Sound source segregation by goldfish: two simultaneous tones. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 125: 4053-4059.
13. Faucher K, Aas-Hansen Ø, Damsgård B, Stenklev NC. 2008. Effects of systemic versus local gentamicin on the inner ear in the Atlantic cod, Gadus morhua (L.), relevance for fish hearing investigations. Hear. Res. 240: 12-21.
14. Harris JA, Cheng AG, Cunningham LL, MacDonald G, Raible DW, et al. 2003. Neomycin-induced hair cell death and rapid regeneration in the lateral line of zebrafish (Danio rerio). J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 4: 219-234.
15. Horodysky AZ, Brill RW, Fine ML, Musick JA, Latour RJ. 2008. Acoustic pressure and particle motion thresholds in six sciaenid fishes. J. Exp. Biol. 211: 1504-1511.
16. Kenyon TN, Ladich F, Yan HY. 1998. A comparative study of hearing ability in fishes: the auditory brainstem response approach. J. Comp. Physiol. A 182: 307-318. (Pubitemid 28104730)
17. Kim CH, Kang SU, Pyun J, Lee MH, Hwang HS, Lee H. 2008. Epicatechin protects auditory hair cells against cisplatin-induced death. Apoptosis 13: 1184-1194.
18. Kwak SJ, Vemaragju S, Moorman SJ, Zeddies D, Popper AN, Riley BB. 2006. Zebrafish pax5 regulates development of the utricular macula and vestibular function. Devl. Dynamics. 235: 3026-3038.
19. Lanford PJ, Platt C, Popper AN. 2000. Structure and function in the saccule of the goldfish (Carassius auratus): a model of diversity in the non-amniote ear. Hear. Res. 143: 1-13. (Pubitemid 30193365)
20. Lombarte A, Yan HY, Popper AN, Chang JS, Platt C. 1993. Damage and regeneration of hair cell ciliary bundles in a fish ear following treatment with gentamicin. Hear. Res. 64: 166-174. (Pubitemid 23036737)
21. Matsuura S, Ikeda K, Furukawa T. 1971. Effects of streptomycin, kanamycin, quinine, and other drugs on the microphonic potentials of goldfish sacculus. Jap. J. Physiol. 21: 579-590.
22. Murakiami SL, Cunningham LL, Werner LA, Bauer E, Pujol R, Raible DW, Rubel EW. 2003. Developmental differences in susceptibility to neomycin-induced hair cell death in the lateral line neuromasts of zebrafish (Danio rerio). Hear. Res. 186: 47-56.
23. Ou HC, Cunningham LL, Francis SP, Brandon CS, Simon JA, Raible DW, Rubel EW. 2009. Identification of FDA-approved drugs and bioactives that protect hair cells in the zebrafish (Danio rerio) lateral line and mouse (Mus musculus) utricle. JARO 9: 178-190.
24. Owens KN, Santos F, Roberts B, Linbo T, Coffin AB, Knisely AJ, Simon JA, Reuble EW, Raible DW. 2008. Identification of genentic and chemical modulators of zebrafish mechanosensory hair cell death. PLoS Genet. 4(2): e1000020.
25. Popper AN. 1977. A scanning electron microscope study of the sacculus and lagena in the ears of fifteen species of teleost fishes. J. Morphol. 153: 397-418.
26. Popper AN. 1978. Scanning electron microscope study of the otolith organs in the birchir (Polypterus bichir) and shovel-nose sturgeon (Scaphirhynchus platorhynchus). J. Comp. Neurol. 18: 117-128.
27. Popper, AN, Lu Z. 2000. Structure-function relationships in fish otolith organs. Fish. Res. 46: 15-25. (Pubitemid 30329484)
28. Popper AN, Saidel W, Chang JSY. 1993. Two types of sensory hair cell in the saccule of a teleost fish. Hear. Res. 62: 211-216.
29. Ramcharitar J, Higgs DM, Popper AN. 2006. Audition in sciaenid fishes with different swim bladder-inner ear configurations. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 119: 439-443. (Pubitemid 43104725)
30. Rogers PH, Cox M. 1988. Underwater sound as a biological stimulus. In Sensory Biology of Aquatic Animals, Atema J, Fay RR, Popper AN, Tavolga WN (eds). New York: Springer; 131-149.
31. Santos F, MacDonald G, Ruble EW, Raible DW. 2006. Lateral line hair cell maturation is a determinant of aminoglycoside susceptibility in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Hear. Res. 213: 25-33.
32. Smith ME, Kane AS, Popper AN. 2004. Acoustical stress and hearing sensitivity in fishes: does the linear threshold shift hypothesis hold water? J. Exp. Biol. 207: 3591-3602.
33. Smith ME, Coffin AB, Miller DL, Popper AN. 2006. Anatomical and functional recovery of the goldfish (Carassius auratus) ear following noise exposure. J. Exp. Biol. 209: 4193-4202.
34. Ton C, Parng C. 2005. The use of zebrafish for assessing ototoxic and otoprotective agents. Hear. Res. 208: 79-88. (Pubitemid 41427131)
35. Whitfield TT, Riley BB, Chiang MY, Phillips B. 2002. Development of the zebrafish inner ear. Devl. Dynam. 223: 427-458.
36. Wysocki LE, Ladich F. 2005. Hearing in fishes under noise conditions. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 6: 28-36.
37. Yan HY, Saidel WM, Chang JS, Presson JC, Popper AN. 1991. Sensory hair cells of a fish ear: evidence of multiple types based on ototoxicity sensitivity. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 245: 133-138.
38. Zeddies DG, Fay RR. 2005. Development of the acoustically evoked behavioral response in zebrafish to pure tones. J. Exp. Biol. 208: 1363-1372.