Cardiovascular research in Spain. A comparative scientometric study

Scientometrics

Volumn 85, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 509-526

  Bolaños Pizarro, Máxima ^a   Thijs, Bart ^b   Glänzel, Wolfgang ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^c INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE   (Hungary)

Author keywords

Cardiovascular research; International collaboration; Research performance; Spain

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956932749     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-009-0155-2     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Aleixandre-Benavent, R., Alonso-Arroyo, A., Chorro-Gascó, F. J., Alfonso-Manterola, A., González-Alcaide, G., Salvador-Taboada, M. J., et al. (2009). La producción científica cardiovascular en España y en el contexto europeo y mundial (2003-2007). Revista Española de Cardiología, 62(12), 1404-1417.
2. Anegón, F. D., & Jiménez-Contreras, E. (1999). Evolución de la producción científica española em los últimos 25 años. El profesional de la información, 8(5), 26.
3. Batagelj, V., & Mrvar, A. (2002). Pajek-analysis and visualization of large networks. Graph Drawing, 2265, 477-478.
4. Beaver, D. D. (2001). Reflections on scientific collaborations (and its study): Past, present and prospective. Scientometrics, 52, 365-377.
5. Beaver, D. D., & Rosen, R. (1978). Studies in scientific collaboration. Part I. The professional origins of scientific co-authorship. Scientometrics, 1, 65-84.
6. Beaver, D. D., & Rosen, R. (1979). Studies in scientific collaboration. Part II. Scientific coauthorship, research productivity and visibility in the French elite. Scientometrics, 1, 133-149.
7. Bordons, M., Gómez, I., Fernández, M. T., Zulueta, M. A., & Méndez, A. (1996). Local, domestic and international scientific collaboration in biomedical research. Scientometrics, 37(2), 279-295.
8. Bordons, M., & Zulueta, M. A. (2002). Interdisciplinarity of Spanish cardiovascular research teams. Revista Española de Cardiología, 55(9), 900-912.
9. Cano, F., & Julian, S. (1992). Some indicators in Spanish scientific production. Scientometrics, 24, 43-59.
10. Cosín Aguilar, J., Plaza Celemin, L., Martín Durán, R., Zarco Gutiérrez, P., López Merino, V., Cortina Llosa, A., et al. (2000). Guidelines for training in cardiology in Spain. Revista Española de Cardiología, 53(2), 212-217.
11. Fuster, V. (2002). Applied cardiological research. Challenges for the new millenium. Revista Española de Cardiología, 55, 327-332.
12. Glänzel, W. (2000). Science in Scandinavia: A bibliometric approach. Scientometrics, 48(2), 121-150. (Correction: Scientometrics, 49 (2000) 357).
13. Glänzel, W. (2001). National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations. Scientometrics, 51(1), 69-115.
14. Glänzel, W. (2008). Bibliometrics as a research field: A course on theory and application of bibliometric indicators. Course handouts. Dept. MSI: KU Leuven.
15. Glänzel, W. (2009). The multi-dimensionality of journal impact. Scientometrics, 78(2), 355-374.
16. Glänzel, W., Debackere, K., & Meyer, M. (2008). 'Triad' or 'Tetrad'? On global changes in a dynamic world. Scientometrics, 74(1), 71-88.
17. Glänzel, W., Janssens, F., Speybroek, S., Schubert, A., & Thijs, B. (2006b). Towards a bibliometrics-aided data retrieval for scientometric purposes. Poster presented at the 9th international conference on science and technology indicators, Leuven, Belgium, 7-9 September 2006.
18. Glänzel, W., Janssens, F., & Thijs, B. (2009a). A comparative analysis of publication activity and citation impact based on the core literature in bioinformatics. Scientometrics, 79(1), 109-129.
19. Glänzel, W., Leta, J., & Thijs, B. (2006a). Science in Brazil. Part 1: A macro-level comparative study. Scientometrics, 67(1), 67-85.
20. Glänzel, W., Meyer, M., Schlemmer, B., du Plessis, M., Thijs, B., Magerman, T., et al. (2003). Nanotechnology-Analysis of an emerging domain of scientific and technologic endeavour. Accessible via: http://www. ecoom. be/fileadmin/user_upload/domain_studies/nanotech_domain_study. pdf. Accessed 16 Dec 2009.
21. Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2001). Double effort = double impact? A critical view at international co-authorship in chemistry. Scientometrics, 50(2), 199-214.
22. Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2004). Analyzing scientific networks through co-authorship. In H. F. Moed, W. Glänzel, & U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research. The use of publication and patent statistics in studies on S& T systems (pp. 257-276). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
23. Glänzel, W., Schubert, A., Thijs, B., & Debackere, K. (2009b). Subfield-specific normalized relative indicators and a new generation of relational charts: Methodological foundations illustrated on the assessment of institutional research performance. Scientometrics, 78(1), 165-188.
24. Glänzel, W., Thijs, B., & Schlemmer, B. (2004). A bibliometric approach to the role of author self-citations in scientific communication. Scientometrics, 59(1), 63-77.
25. Gómez, I., Fernández, M. T., Bordons, M., & Morillo, F. (2004). Spanish scientific output in Medicine in the years 1994-1999. Revista Clínica Española, 204, 75-88.
26. Gómez, I., Fernández, M. T., & Méndez, A. (1995). Collaboration patterns of Spanish scientific publications in different research areas and disciplines. In M. E. D. Koenig & A. Bookstein (Eds.), Proceedings of the biennial conference of the international society for scientometrics and informetrics, learned information (pp. 187-196). NJ: Medford.
27. Granadino, B., Plaza, L. M., & Vidal, C. (2005). Analysis of Spanish scientific output following the Joint Program (Acciones Integradas) of Ministry of Science and Technology (MYCT). Research Evaluation, 14(2), 97-102.
28. Jiménez-Contreras, E., Anegón, F. D., & Degado López-Cozar, E. (2003). The evolution of research activity in Spain: The impact of the National Commission for the evaluation for research activity (CNAI). Research Policy, 32, 123-142.
29. Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26, 1-18.
30. Klein, J. T. (2004). Interdisciplinarity and complexity: An evolving relationship. ECO, 6, 2-10. Accessible via: http://iscepublishing. com/ECO/ECO_other/Issue_6_1-2_4_AC. pdf. Accessed 03 Nov 2009.
31. Laudel, G. (2002). What do we measure by co-authorships? Research Evaluation, 11, 3-15.
32. Lenfant, C. (1997). Heart research: Celebration and renewal. Circulation, 96, 3822-3823.
33. Luukkonen, T., Persson, O., & Sivertsen, G. (1992). Understanding patterns of international scientific collaboration. Science, Technology & Human Values, 17, 101-126.
34. Luukkonen, T., Tijssen, R. J. W., Persson, O., & Sivertsen, G. (1993). The measurement of international scientific collaboration. Scientometrics, 28(1), 15-36.
35. Patel, N. (1973). Collaboration in the professional growth of American sociology. Social Science Information, 12(6), 77-92.
36. REIST-2. (1997). The European report on science and technology indicators 1997. EUR 17639. European Commission, Brussels.
37. Román, A., & Méndez, A. (1994). The Spanish transition to democracy seen through the Spanish database ISOC. Scientometrics, 30(1), 201-212.
38. Rosmarakis, E. S., Vergidis, P. I., Soteriades, E. S., Paraschakis, K., Papastamataki, P. A., & Falagas, M. E. (2005). Estimates of global production in cardiovascular diseases research. International Journal of Cardiology, 100(3), 443-449.
39. Schubert, A., & Braun, T. (1990). World flash on basic research: International collaboration in the sciences, 1981-1985. Scientometrics, 19(1), 3-10.
40. Schubert, A., & Braun, T. (1996). Scientopography-World maps and charts based on scientometric indicators. A bird's eye view on the metropolis and beyond. In R. Waast (Ed.), 20th Century sciences: Beyond the metropolis. Vol. 6. Sciences in the South: Current issues (pp. 65-72). Paris: ORSTOM.
41. Schubert, A., & Glänzel, W. (2006). Cross-national preference in co-authorship, references and citations. Scientometrics, 69(2), 409-428.
42. Sen, S. K., & Gan, S. K. (1983). A mathematical extension of the idea of bibliographic coupling and its applications. Annals of Library Science and Documentation, 30, 78-82.
43. Snyder, H., & Bonzi, S. (1998). Patterns of self-citations across disciplines. Journal of Information Science, 27, 157-178.
44. van Leeuwen, Th. N., & Moed, H. F. (2005). Characteristics of journal impact factors: The effects of uncitedness and citation distribution on the understanding of journal impact factors. Scientometrics, 63(2), 357-371.
45. WHO. (2004). Annex Table 2: Deaths by cause, sex and mortality stratum in WHO regions, estimates for 2002. Accessible via: http://www. who. int/entity/whr/2004/annex/topic/en/annex_2_en. pdf. Accessed 16 Dec 2009.
46. WHO. (2009). WHO Statistical Information System. Accessible via: http://www. who. int/whosis/en/. Accessed 16 Dec 2009.
47. Zulueta, M. A., & Bordons, M. (1999). Spanish scientific production in cardiovascular research through the Science Citation Index (1990-1996). Revista Española de Cardiología, 52(10), 751-764.