Pro & con: State suits against health reform are well grounded in law - And pose serious challenges

Health Affairs

Volumn 29, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1229-1233

  Shapiro, Ilya ^a   Jost, Timothy S ^b  

^a CATO INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON AND LEE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COURT; GOVERNMENT; HEALTH CARE POLICY; INDEPENDENCE; LAW SUIT; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT SAFETY; REVIEW; TAX; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HEALTH INSURANCE; LEGAL ASPECT; MEDICAID; NOTE; POLITICS; UNITED STATES;

FEDERAL GOVERNMENT; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HEALTH CARE REFORM; INSURANCE, HEALTH; MEDICAID; POLITICS; STATE GOVERNMENT; TAXES; UNITED STATES;

EID: 77956929147     PISSN: 02782715     EISSN: 15445208     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0449     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. U.S. Const. art. I, sec. 8, cl. 3.
2. Wickard v. Filburn, 317 U.S. 111, 127-8 (1942).
3. Gonzales v. Raich, 545 U.S. 1, 16-7 (2005).
4. United States v. Lopez, 514 U.S. 549, 561 (1995).
5. United States v. Lopez, 514 U.S. 567, 567-8 (1995).
6. United States v. Morrison, 529 U.S. 598, 615 (2000).
7. United States v. Lopez, 514 U.S. 567, 577 (1995).
8. Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States, 379 U.S. 241 (1964).
9. Katzenbach v. McClung, 379 U.S. 294 (1964).
10. Barnett R. Is healthcare reform unconstitutional? Washington Post. 2010 Mar 21:B2.
11. New York v. United States, 505 U.S. 144 (1992).
12. Printz v. United States, 521 U.S. 898 (1997).
13. Printz v. United States, 521 U.S. 898, 922 (1997).
14. South Dakota v. Dole, 483 U.S. 203 (1987).
15. South Dakota v. Dole, 483 U.S. 203, 211 (1987).
16. Pennhurst State Sch. & Hosp. v. Halderman, 451 U.S. 1, 17 (1981).
17. West Virginia v. U.S. Dep't of Health & Human Svcs., 289 F.3d 281 (4th Cir. 2002).
18. Texas v. United States, 106 F.3d 661 (5th Cir. 1997).
19. California v. United States, 104 F.3d 1086 (9th Cir. 1997).
20. Fernandez v. Wiener, 326 U.S. 340 (1945).
21. Murphy v. Internal Revenue Service, 493 F.3d 170 (D.C. Cir. 2007).
22. U.S. Const. art. I, secs. 2, 9.
23. U.S. Const. art. I, sec. 8.
24. Bailey v. Drexel Furniture Co., 259 U.S. 20, 27-28 (1922).
25. Helvering v. Davis, 301 U.S. 619, 645 (1937).
26. U.S. Const. art I, sec. 8, cl. 1.
27. United States v. Sanchez, 340 U.S. 42, 44 (1950).