Curvelet-domain multiple elimination with sparseness constraints

SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 1333-1336

  Herrmann, Felix J ^a   Verschuur, Eric ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956927691     PISSN: 10523812     EISSN: 19494645     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1190/1.1851110     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. A. J. Berkhout and D. J. Verschuur. Estimation of multiple scattering by iterative inversion, part I: theoretical considerations. Geophysics, 62(5):1586-1595, 1997.
2. E. J. Candès and David Donoho. New tight frames of curvelets and optimal representations of objects with smooth singularities. Technical report, Stanford, 2002. URL http://www.acm.caltech.edu/~emmanuel/publications.html. submitted.
3. E. J. Candès and F. Guo. New multiscale transforms, minimum total variation synthesis: Applications to edge-preserving image reconstruction. Signal Processing, pages 1519-1543, 2002. URL http://www.acm.caltech.edu/~emmanuel/publications.html.
4. Emmanual J. Candès and David L. Donoho. Curvelets-a surprisingly effective nonadaptive representation for objects with edges. Curves and Surfaces. Vanderbilt University Press, 2000.
5. Emmanual J. Candès and David L. Donoho. Recovering Edges in Ill-posed Problems: Optimality of Curvelet Frames. Ann. Statist., 30:784-842, 2000.
6. M. Do and M. Vetterli. Beyond wavelets, chapter Contourlets. Academic Press, 2002.
7. David L. Donoho and Iain M. Johnstone. Minimax estimation via wavelet shrinkage. Annals of Statistics, 26(3):879-921, 1998. URL citeseer.nj.nec.com/donoho92minimax.html.
8. A. Guitton. Adaptive subtraction of multiples using the l1-norm. Geophys Prospect, 52(1):27-27, 2004. URL http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/links/doi/10.1046/j.1365-2478.2004.00401.x/abs.
9. N. Hargreaves, B. ver West, R. Wombell, and D. Trad. Multiple attenuation using apex-shifted radon transform. pages 1929-1932, Dallas, 2003. SEG, Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded abstracts.
10. Felix J. Herrmann. Multifractional splines: application to seismic imaging. In Andrew F. Laine, Eds. Michael A. Unser, Akram Aldroubi, editor, Proceedings of SPIE Technical Conference on Wavelets: Applications in Signal and Image Processing X, SPIE volume 5207, pages 240-258, 2003. URL http://www.eos.ubc.ca/~felix/Preprint/SPIE03DEF.pdf.
11. Felix J. Herrmann. Optimal seismic imaging with curvelets. In Expanded Abstracts, Tulsa, 2003. Soc. Expl. Geophys. URL http://www.eos.ubc.ca/~felix/Preprint/SEG03.pdf.
12. L. T. Ikelle and S. Yoo. An analysis of 2D and 3D inverse scattering multiple attenuation. pages 1973-1976, Calgary, 2000. SEG, Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded abstracts.
13. H. Jakubowicz. Extended subtraction of multiples. Private communication, Delft, 1999.
14. M. M. N. Kabir. Weighted subtraction for diffracted multiple attenuation. pages 1941-1944, Dallas, 2003. SEG, Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded abstracts.
15. S. G. Mallat. A wavelet tour of signal processing. Academic Press, 1997.
16. W. S. Ross. Multiple suppression: beyond 2-D. part I: theory. Delft Univ. Tech., pages 1387-1390, Dallas, 1997. Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded abstracts.
17. D. O. Trad. Interpolation and multiple attenuation with migration operators. Geophysics, 68(6):2043-2054, 2003.
18. D. J. Verschuur and A. J. Berkhout. Estimation of multiple scattering by iterative inversion, part II: practical aspects and examples. Geophysics, 62(5):1596-1611, 1997.
19. D. J. Verschuur, A. J. Berkhout, and C. P. A. Wapenaar. Adaptive surface-related multiple elimination. Geophysics, 57(9):1166-1177, 1992.
20. B. Zhou and S. A. Greenhalgh. Wave-equation extrapolation-based multiple attenuation: 2-d filtering in the f-k domain. Geophysics, 59(10):1377-1391, 1994.