Saving billions of dollars - And physicians' time - By streamlining billing practices

Health Affairs

Volumn 29, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1248-1254

  Blanchfield, Bonnie B ^a   Heffernan, James L ^b   Osgood, Bradford ^a   Sheehan, Rosemary R ^b   Meyer, Gregg S ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b Massachusetts General Physicians Organization   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COST CONTROL; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH SERVICE; HOSPITAL BILLING; MEDICAL FEE; PHYSICIAN; WORKING TIME; ACCOUNTING; ECONOMICS; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH INSURANCE; MEDICARE; METHODOLOGY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; REIMBURSEMENT; UNITED STATES;

ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND RECEIVABLE; COST SAVINGS; EFFICIENCY, ORGANIZATIONAL; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, HOSPITAL; HEALTH CARE COSTS; HEALTH CARE REFORM; INSURANCE, HEALTH; MEDICARE; PHYSICIANS; REIMBURSEMENT MECHANISMS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 77956926894     PISSN: 02782715     EISSN: 15445208     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0075     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Medical Group Management Association. Medical Group Management Association position paper: administrative simplification for medical group practices [Internet]. Englewood (CO): MGMA; 2005 Jun [cited 2010 Apr 16]. Available from: http://www.mgma.com/workarea/showcontent.aspx?id=800
2. Spear S, Bowen HK. Decoding the DNA of the Toyota Production System. Harv Bus Rev. 1999 Sep-Oct:97-106.
3. Woolhandler S, Himmelstein DU. The deteriorating administrative efficiency of the U.S. health care system. N Engl J Med. 1991;324(18):1253-8.
4. For example, the following factors all increase the complexity of processing payments: the changing and increasing need for processing referrals and the implementation of internal and external systems to streamline their issuance; the increasing number of diagnosis and procedure codes; prior authorization for medically necessary services; heterogeneous credentialing requirements; differing payment rules between payers in one health care market; opaque and elusive payment rules; the lack of uniform billing and administrative denial and adjudication processes; and the "arms race" between physician organizations and insurers in creating infrastructure to deal with these phenomena.
5. Woolhandler S, Campbell T, Himmelstein DU. Costs of health care administration in the United States and Canada. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(8):768-75.
6. These projections include all administrative costs, taxes, profits, and other nonbenefit expenses of private health plans. Administrative costs related to billing are just one component of these costs.
7. Keehan S, Sisko A, Truffer C, Smith S, Cowan C, Poisal J, et al. Health spending projections through 2017: the baby-boomer generation is coming to Medicare. Health Aff (Millwood). 2008;27(2):145-55.
8. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Office of the Actuary. National health expenditure projections 2007-2017 [Internet]. Baltimore (MD): CMS; 2007 [cited 2010 Apr 23]. Available from: http://www.cms.hhs.gov/ NationalHealthExpendData/03-NationalHealthAccountsProjected.asp
9. Himmelstein DU, Woolhandler S. Taking care of business: HMOs that spend more on administration deliver lower-quality care. Int J Health Serv. 2002:32(4):657-67.
10. Information from the Hackett Group.
11. Data from the 2008 Faculty Practice Solution Center Billing Office Survey, which is conducted annually by the University HealthSystem Consortium, Oak Brook, IL, and the Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC.
12. Pope C. The cost of administrative complexity: administrative intricacies add no value to health care - but the costs keep stacking up. MGMA Connexion. 2004:4(10):36-41.
13. Healy B. Paperwork pileup. Boston Globe. 2003 Apr 21.
14. Martin JB. Two simple steps that would cut costs and broaden access to health. Boston Globe. 1999 Jan 20.
15. Massachusetts Medical Society. MMS index report. Waltham (MA): MMS; 2007 Mar.
16. Yin RK. Case study research: design and methods. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 2003.
17. A more detailed methods discussion is included in the Appendix, which is available by clicking on the Appendix link in the box to the right of the article online.
18. Hock DW. One from many: Visa and the rise of chaordic organization. San Francisco (CA): Berrett-Koehler Publishers; 2005.
19. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Financial crimes report to the public - fiscal year 2007 [Internet]. Washington (DC): FBI; [cited 2010 Apr 16]. Available from: http://www.fbi.gov/publications/financial/fcs-report2007/ financial-crime-2007.htm
20. Gold M (Mathematica Policy Research Inc., Washington, D.C.). Medicare Advantage in 2008 [Internet]. Menlo Park (CA): Kaiser Family Foundation; 2008 Jun [cited 2010 Apr 16]. Available from: http://www.kff.org/medicare/upload/ 7775.pdf
21. Woodcock E. Massachusetts General Physicians Organization rethinking the revenue cycle. Boston (MA): MGPO, Faculty Practice Solution Center; 2005.
22. Sakowski JA, Kahn JG, Kronick RG, Newman JM, Luft HS. Peering into the black box: billing and insurance activities in a medical group. Health Aff (Millwood). 2009;28(4):w544-54.
23. Casalino LP, Nicholson S, Gans DN, Hammons T, Morra D, Karrison T, et al. What does it cost physician practices to interact with health insurance plans? Health Aff (Millwood). 2009;28(4):w533-43.
24. Zuckerman S, McFeeters J (Urban Institute, Washington, D.C.). Recent growth in health expenditures [Internet]. New York (NY): Commonwealth Fund Commission on a High Performance Health System; 2006 Mar [cited 2010 Apr 16]. Available from: http://www.commonwealthfund.org/usr-doc/Zuckerman-recentgrowth- 914.pdf?section=4039