Anti-mullerian hormone and cumulative pregnancy outcome in in-vitro fertilization

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics

Volumn 27, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 449-456

  Kini, Suresh ^a   Li, H W Raymond ^a,b   Morrell, Dave ^a   Pickering, Sue ^a,c   Thong, K Joo ^a,c  

^a ROYAL INFIRMARY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^c UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Anti mullerian hormone; Assisted conception; Cumulative ongoing pregnancy; Ovarian response

Indexed keywords

HORMONE ANTIBODY; MULLERIAN HORMONE ANTIBODY; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADULT; ARTICLE; ENDOMETRIOSIS; FEMALE; FEMALE SUBFERTILITY; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMAN; INTRACYTOPLASMIC SPERM INJECTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OVULATION INDUCTION; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADULT; ANTI-MULLERIAN HORMONE; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMANS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY RATE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 77956914522     PISSN: 10580468     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10815-010-9427-2     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. FJ Broekmans J Kwee DJ Hendriks BW Mol CB Lambalk 2006 A systematic review of tests predicting ovarian reserve and IVF outcome Hum Reprod Update 12 6 685 718 1:STN:280:DC%2BD28nhtlCquw%3D%3D 10.1093/humupd/dml034 16891297 (Pubitemid 44605509)
2. DJ Cahill CJ Prosser PG Wardle WC Ford MG Hull 1994 Relative influence of serum follicle hormone, age and other factors on ovarian response to gonadotropin stimulation Br J Obstet Gynaecol 101 11 999 1002 1:STN:280:DyaK2M%2Fpt1Ohtg%3D%3D 7999732
3. K Sharif M Elgendy H Lashen M Afnan 1998 Age and basal follicle stimulating hormone as predictors of in vitro fertilization outcome Br J Obstet Gynaecol 105 1 107 12 1:STN:280:DyaK1c7gsVajsw%3D%3D 9442172
4. EH Ng OS Tang PC Ho 2000 The significance of the number of antral follicles prior to stimulation in predicting ovarian responses in an in-vitro fertilization programme Hum Reprod 15 9 1937 42 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvot12rsg%3D%3D 10.1093/humrep/15.9.1937 10966990
5. R Nahum JL Shifren YC Chang L Leykin K Isaacson TL Toth 2001 Antral follicle assessment as a tool for predicting outcome in IVF-is it a better predictor than age and FSH? J Assist Reprod Genet 18 3 151 5 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MzkvVOjsg%3D%3D 10.1023/A:1009424407082 11411430 (Pubitemid 32520027)
6. C Ficicioglu T Kutlu E Baglam Z Bakacak 2006 Early follicular antimullerian hormone as an indicator of ovarian reserve Fertil Steril 85 3 592 6 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XjsVChsro%3D 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.09.019 16500324 (Pubitemid 43261548)
7. DN Lekamge M Barry M Kolo M Lane RB Gilchrist KP Tremellen 2007 Anti-Mullerian hormone as a predictor of IVF outcome Reprod Biomed Online 14 5 602 10 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXmt1Cmtr0%3D 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61053-X 17509203
8. J Kwee R Schats J McDonnell A Themmen F de Jong C Lambalk 2008 Evaluation of anti-Mullerian hormone as a test for the prediction of ovarian reserve Fertil Steril 90 3 737 43 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhtF2qsb%2FF 10.1016/j.fertnstert. 2007.07.1293 17923131
9. SL Broer BW Mol D Hendriks FJ Broekmans 2009 The role of antimullierian hormone in prediction of outcome after IVF: comparison with the antral follicle count Fertil Steril 91 3 705 14 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXnslWms7Y%3D 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.12.013 18321493
10. A Tiitinen C Hyden-Granskog M Gissler 2004 What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction? The value of cryopreservation on cumulative pregnancy rates per single oocyte retrieval should not be forgotten Hum Reprod 19 11 2439 41 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2crisFKmtQ%3D%3D 10.1093/humrep/deh446 15319392 (Pubitemid 39481262)
11. F Ubaldi L Rienzi E Baroni S Ferrero M Iacobelli MG Minasi F Sapienza F Martinez R Anniballo L Cobellis J Tesarik E Greco 2004 Cumulative pregnancy rates after transfer of fresh and thawed embryos Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 115S S106 9 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.01.022 (Pubitemid 38757864)
12. A Borini M Cattoli C Bulletti G Coticchio 2008 Clinical efficiency of oocyte and embryo cryopreservation Ann NY Acad Sci 1127 49 58 10.1196/annals.1434.012 18443329 (Pubitemid 351563105)
13. S Ziebe K Petersen S Lindenberg AG Andersen A Gabrielsen AN Andersen 1997 Embryo morphology or cleavage stage: how to select the best embryos for transfer after in-vitro fertilization Hum Reprod 12 7 1545 9 1:STN:280:DyaK2svgsVajtQ%3D%3D 10.1093/humrep/12.7.1545 9262293 (Pubitemid 27373213)
14. E Van Royen K Mangelschots M Vercruyssen D De Neubourg M Valkenburg G Ryckaert J Gerris 2003 Multinucleation in cleavage stage embryos Hum Reprod 18 5 1062 9 10.1093/humrep/deg201 12721185 (Pubitemid 36592050)
15. GS Nakhuda 2008 The role of mullerian inhibiting substance in female reproduction Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 20 3 257 64 10.1097/GCO.0b013e3282fe99f2 18460940 (Pubitemid 351643513)
16. MM Lee PK Donahoe T Hasegawa B Silverman GB Crist S Best Y Hasegawa RA Noto D Schoenfeld DT MacLaughlin 1996 Mullerian inhibiting substance in humans: normal levels from infancy to adulthood J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81 571 6 1:CAS:528:DyaK28XhtVyksLc%3D 10.1210/jc.81.2.571 8636269 (Pubitemid 26055665)
17. A La Marca FJ Broekmans A Volpe BC Fauser NS Macklon 2009 ESHRE Special Interest Group for Reproductive Endocrinology-AMH Round Table: Anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH): what do we still need to know? Hum Reprod 24 9 2264 75 10.1093/humrep/dep210 19520713
18. T Singer DH Barad A Weghofer N Gleicher 2009 Correlation of antimüllerian hormone and baseline follicle-stimulating hormone levels Fertil Steril 91 6 2616 9 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXhsFOmsLbO 10.1016/j.fertnstert. 2008.03.034 18555223
19. WJ Hehenkamp CW Looman AP Themmen FH de Jong ER Te Velde FJ Broekmans 2006 Anti-Mullerian hormone levels in the spontaneous menstrual cycle do not show substantial fluctuation J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91 10 4057 63 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XhtFSjtb3F 10.1210/jc.2006-0331 16804046 (Pubitemid 44536885)
20. A La Marca G Stabile AC Artenisio A Volpe 2006 Serum anti-Mullerian hormone throughout the human menstrual cycle Hum Reprod 21 12 3103 7 10.1093/humrep/del291 16923748 (Pubitemid 44811610)
21. S Tsepelidis F Devreker I Demeestere A Flahaut Ch Gervy Y Englert 2007 Stable serum levels of anti-Müllerian hormone during the menstrual cycle: a prospective study in normo-ovulatory women Hum Reprod 22 7 1837 40 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXptFOrsLo%3D 10.1093/humrep/dem101 17485437 (Pubitemid 47062749)
22. DM Wunder NA Bersinger M Yared R Kretschmer MH Birkhäuser 2008 Statistically significant changes of antimüllerian hormone and inhibin levels during the physiologic menstrual cycle in reproductive age women Fertil Steril 89 4 927 33 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXmtFylt7w%3D 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.04. 054 17603052 (Pubitemid 351491234)
23. I Streuli T Fraisse C Chapron G Bijaoui P Bischof D de Ziegler 2009 Clinical uses of anti-Müllerian hormone assays: pitfalls and promises Fertil Steril 91 1 226 30 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXnsF2ntL4%3D 10.1016/j.fertnstert. 2007.10.067 18249391
24. R Fanchin LM Schonäuer C Righini N Frydman R Frydman J Taieb 2003 Serum anti-Müllerian hormone dynamics during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation Hum Reprod 18 2 328 32 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXit1yrtro%3D 10.1093/humrep/deg043 12571169 (Pubitemid 36236266)
25. JA Visser FH de Jong JS Laven AP Themmen 2006 Anti-Müllerian hormone: a new marker for ovarian function Reproduction 131 1 1 9 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XhsFehu7o%3D 10.1530/rep.1.00529 16388003 (Pubitemid 43230697)
26. C Weenen JS Laven AR Von Bergh M Cranfield NP Groome JA Visser P Kramer BC Fauser AP Themmen 2004 Anti-Müllerian hormone expression pattern in the human ovary: potential implications for initial and cyclic follicle recruitment Mol Hum Reprod 10 2 77 83 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXms1amtw%3D%3D 10.1093/molehr/gah015 14742691 (Pubitemid 38196508)
27. SM Nelson RW Yates R Fleming 2007 Serum anti-mullerian hormone and FSH: prediction of live birth and extremes of response in stimulated cycles-implications for individualization of therapy Hum Reprod 22 9 2414 21 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXpt1CntbY%3D 10.1093/humrep/dem204 17636277 (Pubitemid 47289055)
28. J Peñarrubia F Fábregues D Manau M Creus G Casals R Casamitjana F Carmona JA Vanrell J Balasch 2005 Basal and stimulation day 5 anti-Mullerian hormone serum concentrations as predictors of ovarian response and pregnancy in assisted reproductive technology cycles stimulated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist-gonadotropin treatmen Hum Reprod 20 4 915 22 10.1093/humrep/deh718 15665015 (Pubitemid 40667835)
29. A La Marca A Volpe 2006 Anti-mullerian hormone (AMH) in female reproduction: is measurement of circulating AMH a useful tool? Clin Endocrinol 64 6 603 10 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2006.02533.x (Pubitemid 43774997)
30. A Hazout P Bouchard DB Seifer P Aussage AM Junca P Cohen-Bacrie 2004 Serum antimüllerian hormone/müllerian-inhibiting substance appears to be a more discriminatory marker of assisted reproductive technology outcome than follicle-stimulating hormone, inhibin B, or estradiol Fertil Steril 82 5 1323 9 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXhvFOjsbo%3D 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.03.061 15533354 (Pubitemid 39469455)
31. T Silberstein DT MacLaughlin I Shai JR Trimarchi G Lambert-Messerlian DB Seifer DL Keefe AS Blazer 2006 MIS levels at the time of HCG administration in IVF cycles predict both ovarian reserve and embryo morphology Hum Reprod 21 1 159 63 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXht1Oqt7bL 10.1093/humrep/dei270 16123085 (Pubitemid 41794305)
32. T Ebner M Sommergruber M Moser O Shebl E Schreier-Lechner G Tews 2006 Basal level of AMH is associated with oocyte quality in stimulated cycles Hum Reprod 21 8 2022 6 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28Xotl2lsr4%3D 10.1093/humrep/del127 16679324 (Pubitemid 44288076)
33. JM Smeenk FC Sweep GA Zielhuis JA Kremer CM Thomas DD Braat 2007 Antimüllerian hormone predicts ovarian responsiveness, but not embryo quality or pregnancy, after in vitro fertilization or intracyoplasmic sperm injection Fertil Steril 87 1 223 6 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhvVSltLo%3D 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.06.019 17081531 (Pubitemid 46013883)
34. S Lie Fong EB Baart E Martini I Schipper JA Visser AP Themmen FH de Jong MM van den Heuvel-Eibrink 2008 Anti-Mullerian hormone: a marker for oocyte quantity, oocyte quality and embryo quality? Reprod Biomed Online 16 5 664 70 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1czivFCjtw%3D%3D 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60480-4 18492370
35. LG Nardo TA Gelbaya H Wilkinson SA Roberts A Yates P Pemberton I Laing 2009 Circulating basal anti-mullerian hormone levels as predictor of ovarian response in women undergoing ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization Fertil Steril 92 5 1586 93 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXlslKrsg%3D%3D 10.1016/j. fertnstert.2008.08.127 18930213
36. SM Nelson RW Yates H Lyall M Jamieson I Traynor M Gaudoin P Mitchell P Ambrose R Fleming 2009 Anti-Mullerian hormone based approach to controlled ovarian stimulation for assisted conception Hum Reprod 24 4 867 75 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXjsFektrY%3D 10.1093/humrep/den480 19136673
37. A Tocci S Ferrero M Iacobelli E Greco 2009 Negligible serum anti-mullerian hormone: pregnancy and birth after a 1-month course of an oral contraceptive, ovarian hyperstimulation, and intracytoplasmic sperm injection Fertil Steril 92 1 395.e9.e12 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.03.044