|
|
Volumn 304, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 1313-1315
|
|
Inconsistent results, inaccurate claims plague direct-to-consumer gene tests
a
a
NONE
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
DNA;
GENETIC MARKER;
BREAST CANCER;
CANCER RISK;
CONSUMER;
DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY;
DNA DETERMINATION;
FAMILY HISTORY;
FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION;
GENETIC COUNSELING;
GENETIC TEST;
HUMAN;
LABORATORY TEST;
MARKETING;
MEDICAL ETHICS;
PATIENT RIGHT;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
PRIVACY;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS;
SHORT SURVEY;
UNITED STATES;
ADVERTIZING;
GENETIC MARKER;
GENETIC PREDISPOSITION;
GENETIC SCREENING;
INTERNET;
PACKAGING;
REPRODUCIBILITY;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
STANDARDS;
STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;
ADVERTISING AS TOPIC;
CONSUMER PARTICIPATION;
DNA;
GENETIC MARKERS;
GENETIC PREDISPOSITION TO DISEASE;
GENETIC TESTING;
HUMANS;
INTERNET;
PRODUCT LABELING;
REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
|
|
EID: 77956910741
PISSN: 00987484
EISSN: 15383598
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2010.1328 Document Type: Short Survey |
|
Times cited : (23)
|
|
References (0)
|
