The iCE approach for journal evaluation

Scientometrics

Volumn 85, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 561-565

  Prathap, Gangan ^a  

^a CSIR NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE COMMUNICATION AND INFORMATION RESOURCES   (India)

Author keywords

h index; Impact factor; Journal evaluation; p index

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956905330     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-010-0239-z     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Bollen, J., van de Sempel, H., & Hagberg, E. (2009). A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures. e-Print Archive. http://lanl. gov/abs/0902. 2183.
2. Davis, P. M. (2008). Eigenfactor: Does the principle of repeated improvement result in better estimates than raw citation counts? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59, 2186-2188.
3. Fersht, A. (2009). The most influential journals: Impact Factor and Eigenfactor. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U. S. A., 106, 6883-6884.
4. Garfield, E. (2006). The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. Journal of the American Medical Association, 295, 90-93.
5. Glanzel, W. (2008). On some new bibliometric applications of statistics related to the h-index. OR 0801, KU Leuven.
6. Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U. S. A., 102, 16569-16572.
7. Prathap, G. (2009). Is there a place for a mock h-index? Scientometrics (to appear). doi: 10. 1007/s11192-009-0066-2.
8. Prathap, G. (2010). An iCE map approach to evaluate performance and efficiency of scientific production. Scientometrics (to appear). doi: 10. 1007/s11192-010-0192-x.
9. Schubert, A., & Glanzel, W. (2007). A systematic analysis of Hirsch-type indices for journals. Journal of Informetrics, 1, 179-184.
10. TM and h-index to evaluate scientific journals. Scientometrics (to appear). doi: 10. 1007/s11192-009-0116-9.