Testing the heterospecific attraction hypothesis with time-series data on species co-occurrence

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 277, Issue 1696, 2010, Pages 2983-2990

  Sebastián González, Esther ^a,b   Sánchez Zapata, José Antonio ^b   Botella, Francisco ^b   Ovaskainen, Otso ^c  

^a DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION BIOLOGY   (Spain)

^b MIGUEL HERNÁNDEZ UNIVERSITY   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

Artificial wetlands; Heterospecific attraction hypothesis; Multivariate logistic regression; Social information; Species distribution; Waterbirds

Indexed keywords

BREEDING POPULATION; CONSPECIFIC; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; HABITAT QUALITY; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; IRRIGATION SYSTEM; POND; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; TIME SERIES; WATERFOWL;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 77956902015     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2010.0244     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (40)

1. Abellán, P., Sánchez-Fernández, D., Millán, A., Botella, F., Sánchez-Zapata, J. A. & Giménez, A. 2006 Irrigation ponds as macroinvertebrate habitat in a semi-arid agricultural landscape (SE Spain). J. Arid Environ. 67, 255-269. (doi:10.1016/j.jaridenv. 2006.02.009) (Pubitemid 44192444)
2. Ahlering, M. A. & Faaborg, J. 2006 Avian habitat management meets conspecific attraction: if you build it, will they come? Auk 123, 301-312. (doi:10.1642/0004-8038(2006)123[301:AHMMCA]2.0.CO;2) (Pubitemid 43726148)
3. Arocena, R. 2007 Effects of submerged aquatic vegetation on macrozoobenthos in a coastal lagoon of the southwestern Atlantic. Int. Rev. Hydrobiol. 92, 33-47. (doi:10.1002/ iroh.200610881)
4. Barnard, J., McCulloch, R. & Meng, X. L. 2000 Modeling covariance matrices in terms of standard deviations and correlations, with application to shrinkage. Stat. Sin. 10, 1281-1311.
5. Bertness, M. D. & Callaway, R. 1994 Positive interactions in communities. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9, 191-193. (doi:10. 1016/0169-5347(94)90088-4)
6. Cressie, N., Calder, C. A., Clark, J. S., Hoef, J. M. V. & Wikle, C. K. 2009 Accounting for uncertainty in ecological analysis: the strengths and limitations of hierarchical statistical modeling. Ecol. Appl. 19, 553-570. (doi:10. 1890/07-0744.1)
7. Céréghino, R., Biggs, J., Oerti, B. & Declerck, S. 2008 The ecology of European ponds: defining the characteristics of a neglected freshwater habitat. Hydrobiologia 597, 1-6. (doi:10.1007/s10750-007-9225-8)
8. Chase, J. M. & Leibold, M. A. 2003 Ecological niches. Linking classical and contemporary approaches. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
9. Chesson, P. 2000 General theory of competitive coexistence in spatially-varying environments. Theor. Popul. Biol. 58, 211-237. (doi:10.1006/tpbi.2000.1486) (Pubitemid 33037539)
10. Cramp, S. 1998 The complete birds of the western Palearctic in CD-room. London, UK: Oxford University Press.
11. De Meester, L., Declerck, S., Stoks, R., Louette, G., van de Meutter, F., de Brie, T., Michels, E. & Brendonck, L. 2005 Ponds and pools as model systems in conservation biology, ecology and evolutionary biology. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 15, 715-725. (doi:10.1002/aqc. 748)
12. Diamond, J. M. 1975 Assembly of species communities. In Ecology and evolution of communities (eds M. L. Cody & J. M. Diamond), pp. 342-444. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13. Forsman, J. T. & Thomson, R. L. 2008 Evidence of information collection from heterospecifics in cavity-nesting birds. Ibis 150, 409-412. (doi:10.1111/j.1474-919X. 2007.00773.x) (Pubitemid 351442606)
14. Forsman, J. T., Hjernquist, M. B. & Gustafsson, L. 2009 Experimental evidence for the use of density based interspecific social information in forest birds. Ecography 32, 539-545. (doi:10.1111/j.1600-0587.2008.05635.x)
15. Gotelli, N. J. 2000 Null model analysis of species co-occurrence patterns. Ecology 81, 2606-2621. (doi:10.1890/ 0012-9658(2000)081[2606:NMAOSC]2. 0.CO;2)
16. Gotelli, N. J. & McCabe, D. L. 2002 Species co-occurrence: a metaanalysis of J. M. Diamond's assembly rules. Ecology 83, 2091-2096. (doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083 [2091:SCOAMA]2.0.CO;2)
17. Hromada, M., Antczak, M., Valone, T. J. & Tryjanowski, P. 2008 Settling decisions and heterospecific social information use in shrikes. PLoS ONE 3, e3930. (doi:10. 1371/journal.pone.0003930)
18. Leibold, M. A. & Mikkelson, G. M. 2002 Coherence, species turnover, and boundary clumping: elements of meta-community structure. Oikos 97, 237-250. (doi:10.1034/ j.1600-0706.2002.970210.x)
19. Mac Arthur, R. & Levins, R. 1967 The limiting similarity, convergence, and divergence of coexisting species. Am. Nat. 101, 377-385. (doi:10.1086/282505)
20. Mönkkönen, M. & Forsman, J. T. 2002 Heterospecific attraction among forest birds: a review. Ornithol. Sci. 1, 41-51. (doi:10.2326/osj.1.41)
21. Mönkkönen, M., Helle, P. & Soppela, K. 1990 Numerical and behavioural responses of migrant passerines to experimental manipulation of resident tits (Par us spp.): heterospecific attraction in northern breeding bird communities? Oecologia 85, 218-255. (doi:10.1007/ BF00319404)
22. Mönkkönen, M., Härdling, R., Forsman, J. T. & Tuomi, J. 1999 Evolution of heterospecific attraction: using other species as cues in habitat selection. Evol. Ecol. 13, 91-104. (doi:10.1023/A:1006590215306)
23. Nudds, T. D., Sjöberg, K. & Lundberg, P. 1994 Ecomorpho-logical relationships among Palearctic dabbling ducks on Baltic coastal wetlands and a comparison with the Nearctic. Oikos 69, 295-303. (doi:10.2307/3546150)
24. Nudds, T. D., Elmberg, J., Sjoöberg, K., Pöysä, H. & Nummi, P. 2000 Ecomorphology in breeding Holarctic dabbling ducks: the importance of lamellar density and body length varies with habitat type. Oikos 91, 583-588. (doi:10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.910321.x)
25. O'Brien, S. M. & Dunson, D. B. 2004 Bayesian multivariate logistic regression. Biometrics 60, 739-746. (doi:10.1111/ j.0006-341X.2004.00224.x)
26. Ovaskainen, O., Hottola, J. & Siitonen, J. In press. Modelling species co-occurrence by multivariate logistic regression generates new hypotheses on fungal interactions. Ecology. (doi:10.1890/10-0173.1)
27. Peres-Neto, P. R., Olden, J. D. & Jackson, D. A. 2001 Environmentally constrained null models: site suitability as occupancy criterion. Oikos 93, 110-120. (doi:10. 1034/j.1600-0706.2001.930112.x)
28. Pöysä, H., Elmberg, J., Nummi, P. & Sjöberg, K. 1996 Are ecomorphological associations among dabbling ducks consistent at different spatial scales? Oikos 76, 608-612. (doi:10.2307/3546358)
29. Pupin, F., Sacchi, R., Gentilli, A., Galeotti, P. & Fasola, M. 2007 Discrimination of toad calls by smooth newts: support for the heterospecific attraction hypothesis. Anim. Behav. 74, 1683-1690. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav. 2007.03.020) (Pubitemid 350216808)
30. Ramsar Convention Secretariat. 2006 The Ramsar Convention manual: a guide to the Convention on Wetlands, 4th edn. Gland, Switzerland: Ramsar Convention Secretariat.
31. Sánchez-Zapata, J. A., Anadón, J. D., Carrete, M., Giménez, A., Navarro, J., Villacorta, C. & Botella, F. 2005 Breeding water-birds in relation to artificial pond attributes: implications for the design of irrigation facilities. Biodivers. Conserv. 14, 1627-1639. (doi:10.1007/s10531-004-0534-1) (Pubitemid 40886298)
32. Sebastián-González, E., Sánchez-Zapata, J. A. & Botella, F. 2010a Agricultural ponds as alternative habitat for water-birds: spatial and temporal patterns of abundance and management strategies. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 56, 11-20. (doi:10.1007/s10344-009-0288-x)
33. Sebastián-González, E., Botella, F., Paracuellos, M. & Sánchez-Zapata, J. A. 2010b Processes driving temporal dynamics in the nested pattern of waterbird communities. Acta Oecol. 36, 160-165. (doi:10.1016/j.actao.2009.11. 006)
34. Sfenthourakis, S., Tzanatos, E. & Giokas, S. 2005 Species co-occurrence: the case of congeneric species and a causal approach to patterns of species association. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 15, 39-49. (doi:10.1111/j.1466- 822X.2005.00192.x)
35. Stamps, J. A. 1988 Conspecific attraction and aggregation in territorial species. Am. Nat. 131, 329-347. (doi:10.1086/ 284793) (Pubitemid 19319886)
36. Thomson, R. L., Forsman, J. T. & Mönkkönen, M. 2003 Positive interactions between migrant and resident birds: testing the heterospecific attraction hypothesis. Oecologia 134, 431-438. (doi:10.1007/s00442-002-1140-0)
37. Tilman, D. 1982 Resource competition and community structure. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
38. Uŕios, V., Escobar, J. V., Pardo, R. & Goómez, J. A. 1991 Atlas de aves nidificantes de la Comunidad Valenciana. Valencia, Spain: Conselleŕia de Agricultura y Pesca.
39. Villarreal-Barajas, T. & Martorell, C. 2009 Species-specific disturbance tolerance, competition and positive interactions along an anthropogenic disturbance gradient. J. Veg. Sci. 20, 1027-1040. (doi:10.1111/j.1654-1103. 2009.01101.x)
40. Westphal, M. I., Field, S. A., Tyre, A. J., Paton, D. & Possingham, H. P. 2003 Effects of landscape pattern on bird species distribution in the Mt. Lofty Ranges, South Australia. Landsc. Ecol. 18, 413-426. (doi:10.1023/ A:1026115807529)