Multimodal signalling in a songbird: Male audiovisual displays vary significantly by social context in brown-headed cowbirds

Animal Behaviour

Volumn 79, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1285-1292

  O'Loghlen, Adrian L ^a   Rothstein, Stephen I ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Audiovisual; Brown headed cowbird; Communication; Molothrus ater; Multimodal; Sexual selection; Signal; Social

Indexed keywords

DATA SET; FUNCTIONAL MORPHOLOGY; IDENTIFICATION METHOD; INTERSEXUAL INTERACTION; INTRASEXUAL INTERACTION; MATING SUCCESS; NUMERICAL MODEL; SEXUAL SELECTION; SIGNALING; SONGBIRD; VISUAL ANALYSIS;

MOLOTHRUS ATER; PASSERI;

EID: 77956901042     PISSN: 00033472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.03.001     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Baker, M. C. & Cunningham, M. A. 1985. The biology of bird-song dialects. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8, 85-133.
2. Balsby, T. J. S. & Dabelsteen, T. 2002. Female behaviour affects male courtship in whitethroats, Sylvia communis: an interactive experiment using visual and acoustic cues. Animal Behaviour, 63, 251-257.
3. Bradbury, J. W. & Vehrencamp, S. L. 1998. Principles of Animal Communication. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer.
4. Candolin, U. 1999. The relationship between signal quality and physical condition: is sexual signalling honest in the three-spined stickleback? Animal Behaviour, 58, 1261-1267.
5. Candolin, U. 2003. The use of multiple cues in mate choice. Biological Reviews, 78, 575-595.
6. Catchpole, C. K. & Slater, P. J. 2008. Bird Song Biological Themes and Variations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Chapman, T., Arnqvist, G., Bangham, J. & Rowe, L. 2003. Sexual conflict. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 18, 41-47.
8. Cooper, B. G. & Goller, F. 2004. Multimodal signals: enhancement and constraint of song motor patterns by visual display. Science, 303, 544-546.
9. Doupe, A. J. & Kuhl, P. K. 1999. Birdsong and human speech: common themes and mechanisms. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 22, 567-631.
10. Dufty, A. M. 1982. Response of brown-headed cowbirds to simulated conspecific intruders. Animal Behaviour, 30, 1043-1052.
11. Dufty, A. M. 1985. Song sharing in the brown-headed cowbird (Molothrus ater). Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 69, 177-190.
12. Dufty, A. M. Jr. & McChrystal, R. 1992. Vocalization and copulatory attempts in free-living brown-headed cowbirds. Journal of Field Ornithology, 63, 16-25.
13. Freeberg, T. M. & White, D. J. 2006. Social traditions and the maintenance and loss of geographic variation in mating patterns of brown-headed cowbirds. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 19, 206-222.
14. Freeberg, T. M., King, A. P. & West, M. J. 2001. Cultural transmission of vocal traditions in cowbirds (Molothrus ater) influences courtship patterns and mate preferences. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 115, 201-211.
15. Friedmann, H. 1929. The Cowbirds, a Study in the Biology of Social Parasitism. Springfield, Illinois: C.C. Thomas.
16. Galoch, Z. & Bischof, H.-J. 2006. Zebra Finches actively choose between live images of conspecifics. Ornithological Science, 5, 57-64.
17. Gorney-Labinger, E. & Rothstein, S. I. 2002. Brown-headed cowbirds in eastern and western North America show similar use of courtship songs in copulation contexts. Condor, 104, 866-872.
18. Hansen, T. F. & Price, D. K. 1995. Good genes and old age: do old mates provide superior genes? Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 8, 759-778.
19. Hebets, E. A. & Papaj, D. R. 2005. Complex signal function: developing a framework of testable hypotheses. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 57, 197-214.
20. Hill, J. A., Enstrom, D. A., Ketterson, E. D., Nolan, V. Jr. & Ziegenfus, C. 1999. Mate choice based on static versus dynamic secondary sexual traits in the dark-eyed junco. Behavorial Ecology, 10, 91-96.
21. Hosken, D. & Snook, R. 2005. How important is sexual conflict? American Naturalist, Supplement, 165, S1-S4.
22. Hosoi, A. S., Rothstein, S. I. & O'Loghlen, A. L. 2005. Sexual preferences of female brown-headed cowbirds (Molothrus ater) for perched song repertoires. Auk, 122, 82-93.
23. Hurd, P. L. & Enquist, M. 2001. Threat display in birds. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 79, 931-942.
24. King, A. P. & West, M. J. 1977. Species identification in the North American cowbird: appropriate responses to abnormal song. Science, 195, 1002-1004.
25. King, A. P., Freeberg, T. M. & West, M. J. 1996. Social experience affects the process and outcome of vocal ontogeny in two populations of cowbirds (Molothrus ater). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 110, 276-285.
26. Kodric-Brown, A. & Nicoletto, P. F. 2001. Female choice in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata): the interaction between male color and display. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 50, 346-351.
27. Kokko, H. 1998. Good genes, old age and life-history trade-offs. Evolutionary Ecology, 12, 739-750.
28. Kokko, H., Rintamaki, P. T., Alatalo, R. V., Hoglund, J., Karvonen, E. & Lundberg, A. 1999. Female choice selects for lifetime lekking performance in black grouse males. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 266, 2109-2115.
29. Kroodsma, D. E. & Miller, E. H. 1996. Ecology and Evolution of Acoustic Communication in Birds. Ithaca, New York: Comstock.
30. Marler, P. 1997. Three models of song learning: evidence from behavior. Journal of Neurobiology, 33, 501-516.
31. Møller, A. P. & Pomiankowski, A. 1993. Why have birds got multiple sexual ornaments? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 32, 167-176.
32. Møller, A. P., Saino, N., Taramino, G., Galeotti, P. & Ferrario, S. 1998. Paternity and multiple signaling: effects of a secondary sexual character and song on paternity in the barn swallow. American Naturalist, 151, 236-242.
33. Nelson, D. A. & Marler, P. 1994. Selection-based learning in bird song development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A., 91, 10498-10501.
34. Nero, R. W. 1963. Comparative behavior of the yellow-headed blackbird, redwinged blackbird, and other icterids. Wilson Bulletin, 75, 376-413.
35. Nice, M. M. 1943. Studies in the life history of the song sparrow II. The behavior of the song sparrow and other passerines. Transactions of the Linnean Society of New York, 6, 1-328.
36. O'Loghlen, A. L. 1995. Delayed access to local songs prolongs vocal development in dialect populations of brown-headed cowbirds. Condor, 97, 402-414.
37. O'Loghlen, A. L. & Rothstein, S. I. 1993. An extreme example of delayed vocal development: song learning in a population of wild brown-headed cowbirds. Animal Behaviour, 46, 293-304.
38. O'Loghlen, A. L. & Rothstein, S. I. 1995. Culturally correct song dialects are correlated with male age and female song preferences in wild populations of brown-headed cowbirds. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 36, 251-259.
39. O'Loghlen, A. L. & Rothstein, S. I. 2002a. Ecological effects on song learning: delayed development is widespread in wild populations of brown-headed cowbirds. Animal Behaviour, 63, 475-486.
40. O'Loghlen, A. L. & Rothstein, S. I. 2002b. East and west coast female brown-headed cowbirds agree: both categories of male song are sexy. Animal Behaviour, 64, 609-617.
41. O'Loghlen, A. L. & Rothstein, S. I. 2003. Female preference for the songs of older males and the maintenance of dialects in brown-headed cowbirds (Molothrus ater). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 53, 102-109.
42. O'Loghlen, A. L. & Rothstein, S. I. 2004. Divergent sexual responses to different categories of foreign courtship songs in female brown-headed cowbirds (Molothrus ater). Auk, 121, 824-836.
43. O'Loghlen, A. L. & Rothstein, S. I. 2010. Delayed sensory learning and development of dialect songs in brown-headed cowbirds (Molothrus ater). Animal Behaviour, 79, 299-311.
44. O'Loghlen, A. L. & Rothstein, S. I. In press. Male visual displays enhance female sexual responsiveness to song in a songbird, the brown-headed cowbird. Condor.
45. Ortega, C. P., Ortega, J. C., Backensto, S. A. & Rapp, C. A. 1996. Improved methods for aging second-year and after-second-year male brown-headed cowbirds. Journal of Field Ornithology, 67, 542-548.
46. Partan, S. R. & Marler, P. 2005. Issues in the classification of multimodal communication signals. American Naturalist, 166, 231-245.
47. Patricelli, G. L., Coleman, S. W. & Borgia, G. 2006. Male satin bowerbirds, Ptilonorhynchus violaceus, adjust their display intensity in response to female startling: an experiment with robotic females. Animal Behaviour, 71, 49-59.
48. Peek, F. W. 1971. Seasonal change in the breeding behavior of the male red-winged blackbird. Wilson Bulletin, 83, 383-395.
49. Price, J. J., Earnshaw, S. M. & Webster, M. S. 2006. Montezuma oropendolas modify a component of song constrained by body size during vocal contests. Animal Behaviour, 71, 799-807.
50. Proulx, S. R., Day, T. & Rowe, L. 2002. Older males signal more reliably. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 269, 2291-2299.
51. Robinson, F. N. & Curtis, H. S. 1996. The vocal displays of the lyrebirds (Menuridae). Emu, 96, 258-275.
52. Rothstein, S. I., Yokel, D. A. & Fleischer, R. C. 1988. The agonistic and sexual functions of vocalizations of male brown-headed cowbirds, Molothrus ater. Animal Behaviour, 36, 73-86.
53. Searcy, W. A. & Andersson, M. 1986. Sexual selection and the evolution of song. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 17, 507-533.
54. Selander, D. M. & Giller, A. L. A. 1960. First year plumages of the brown-headed cowbird and red-winged blackbird. Condor, 62, 202-214.
55. Smith, V. A., King, A. P. & West, M. J. 2002. The context of social learning: association patterns in a captive flock of brown-headed cowbirds. Animal Behaviour, 63, 23-35.
56. Spector, D. A. 1992. Wood-warbler Song Systems: a Review of Paruline Singing Behaviors. New York: Plenum.
57. Sullivan, M. S. 1994. Mate choice as an information gathering process under time constraint: implications for behaviour and signal design. Animal Behaviour, 47, 141-151.
58. Summers-Smith, J. D. 1963. The House Sparrow. London: Collins.
59. West, M. J., King, A. P. & Eastzer, D. H. 1981. Validating the female bioassay of cowbird song: relating differences in song potency to mating success. Animal Behaviour, 29, 490-501.
60. West, M. J., King, A. P. & Freeberg, T. M. 1998. Dual signaling during mating in brown-headed cowbirds (Molothrus ater, family Emberizidae/Icterinae). Ethology, 104, 250-267.
61. West, M. J., King, A. P., White, D. J., Gros-Louis, J. & Freed-Brown, G. 2006. The development of local song preferences in female cowbirds (Molothrus ater): flock living stimulates learning. Ethology, 112, 1095-1107.
62. White, D. J., King, A. P. & West, M. J. 2002. Facultative development of courtship and communication in cowbirds, Molothrus ater. Behavioral Ecology, 23, 487-496.
63. Williams, H. 2001. Choreography of song, dance and beak movements in the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata). Journal of Experimental Biology, 204, 3497-3506.
64. Yokel, D. A. 1986. The social organization of the brown-headed cowbird in the Owens Valley, California. In: Natural History of the White-Inyo Range, Eastern California and Western Nevada and High Altitude Physiology. University of California, White Mountain Research Station Symposium (Ed. by C. A. J. Hall & D. J. Young), pp. 164-172. Los Angeles: Regents of the University of California.
65. Yokel, D. A. & Rothstein, S. I. 1991. The basis for female choice in an avian brood parasite. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 29, 39-45.