Australian education journals: Quantitative and qualitative indicators

Australian Academic and Research Libraries

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 88-104

  Haddow, Gaby ^a   Genoni, Paul ^a  

^a CURTIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956896699     PISSN: 00048623     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00048623.2009.10721388     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. L Butler 'Identifying 'Highly Rated' Journals: An Australian Case Study'Scientometrics2002 vol 53 no 2 pp 207-27.
2. J W East 'Ranking Journals in the Humanities: An Australian Case Study'AARL2006 vol 37 no 1 pp 3-16.
3. H K Lawrence The Use of Bibliometric Analysis of Citations to Define and Analyze the Core of Australian Legal Literature Masters [dissertation]. Sydney University of New South Wales 1979.
4. P Royle 'A Citation Analysis of Australian Science and Social Science Journals' AARL 1994 vol 25 no 3 pp 162-71.
5. P Genoni & G Haddow 'ERA and the Ranking of Australian Humanities Journals' Australian Humanities Review 2009 forthcoming vol 45 no 2.
6. P Genoni, G Haddow & P Dumbell 'Assessing the Impact of Australian Journals in the Social Sciences and Humanities' Information Online January 20-22 Sydney 2009 at http://www.information-online.com.au/sb_clients/ iog/bin/iog_programme_C16.cfm?vm_key=F01AF945-B9E3-916BC0628D75449D3673.
7. G Haddow 'Quality Australian Journals in the Humanities and Social Sciences' AARL 2008 vol 39 no 2 pp 79-91.
8. Australian Research Council ERA Indicator Descriptions 2008 at http://www. arc.gov.au/era/indicators.htm.
9. Australian Research Council ERA Indicator Principles 2008 at http://www.arc. gov.au/era/indicators.htm.
10. Australian Research Council Draft ERA Submission Guidelines: Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences (PCE) and Humanities and Creative Arts (HCA) Clusters 2009 at http://www.arc.gov.au/pdf/Draft_ERA_Sub_Guide.pdf.
11. B D Cameron 'Trends in the Usage of ISI Bibliometric Data: Uses, Abuses, and ImplicationsPortal: Libraries and the Academy2005 vol 5 no 1 pp 105-25.
12. C Steele, L Butler & D Kingsley 'The Publishing Iimperative: The Pervasive Influence of Publication Metrics' Learned Publishing 2006 vol 19 no 4 pp 277- 90.
13. HM Treasury Government Meeting Science Goals 2006 at http://www.hmtreasury. gov.uk/press_53_06.htm.
14. B Cronin The Citation Process: The Role and Significance of Citations in Scientific Communication London Taylor Graham 1984.
15. N Kaplan 'The Norms of Citation Behavior: Prolegomena to the Footnote'American Documentation1965 vol 16 no 3 pp 179-84.
16. L C Smith 'Citation Analysis' Library Trends 1981 vol 30 pp 83-106.
17. H IBowman&K I Stergiou 'Factors and Indices are One Thing, Deciding Who is Scholarly, Why They are Scholarly, and the Relative Value of Their Scholarship is Something Else Entirely'Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics2008 vol 8 pp 1-3.
18. P Campbell 'Escape from the Impact Factor' Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics 2008 vol 8 pp 5-7.
19. P A Todd & R J Ladle 'Hidden Dangers of a 'Citation Culture'' Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics 2008 vol 8 pp 13-6.
20. A Coleman 'Assessing the Value of a Journal Beyond the Impact Factor' Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2007 vol 58 no 8 pp 1148-61.
21. R Monastersky 'The Number That's Devouring Science' The Chronicle 2005 vol 52 no 8.
22. E Garfield 'The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor' JAMA 2006 vol 295 no 1 pp 90-3.
23. EGarfield 'Journal Impact Factor: A Brief Review' Canadian Medical Association Journal1999 vol 161 no 8 pp 979-80.
24. P A Lawrence 'Lost in Publication: How Measurement Harms Science'Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics2008 vol 8 pp 9-11.
25. MBordons, M T Fernandez & I Gomez 'Advantages and Limitations in the Use of Impact Factor Measures for the Assessment of Research Performance in a Peripheral Country'Scientometrics2002 vol 53 no 2 pp 195-206.
26. D Hicks 'The Difficulty of Achieving Full Coverage of International Social Science Literature and the Bibliometric Consequences' Scientometrics 1999 vol 44 no 2 pp 193-215.
27. N Bakkalbasi, K Bauer, J Glover & L Wang 'Three Options for Citation Tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science' Biomedical Digital Libraries 2006 vol 3 no 7.
28. J Bar-Ilan 'Which hindex? A Comparison of Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar' Scientometrics 2008 vol 74 no 2 pp 257-71.
29. YGavel& L Iselid 'Web of Science and Scopus: AJournal Title Overlap Study' Online Information Review2008 vol 32 no 1 pp 8-21.
30. A-WL Harzing & R van der Wal 'Google Scholar as a New Source For Citation Analysis' Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics 2008 vol 8 pp 61-73.
31. P Jacso 'As We May Search - Comparison of Major Features of the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar Citation-based and Citation-enhanced Databases'Current Science2005 vol 89 no 9 pp 1537-47.
32. L I Meho & K Yang 'Impact of Data Sources on Citation Counts and Rankings of LIS Faculty: Web of Science Versus Scopus and Google Scholar'Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology2007 vol 58 no 13 pp 2105-25.
33. R M Shewchuk, S J O'Connor, E S Williams & G T Savage 'Beyond Rankings: Using Cognitive Mapping to Understand What Health Care Journals Represent' Social Science & Medicine 2006 vol 62 no 5 [Abstract only].
34. J Bollen, M A Rodriguez & H Van de Sompel 'Journal Status'Scientometrics2006 vol 69 no 3 pp 669-87.
35. J Duy & L Vaughan 'Can Electronic Journal Usage Data Replace Citation Data as a Measure of Journal Use?An Empirical Examination' Journal of Academic Librarianship 2006 vol 32 no 5 pp 512-7.
36. M Thelwall 'Bibliometrics to Webometrics' Journal of Information Science 2008 vol 34 no 4 pp 605-21.
37. J EHirsch 'An Index to Quantify an Individual's Scientific Research Output'.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences2005 vol 102 pp 16569-72.
38. TBraun, W Glanzel & A Schubert 'A Hirsch-type Index for Journals' Scientometrics2006 vol 69 no 1 pp 169-73.
39. C Oppenheim 'Using the h-index to Rank Influential British Researchers in Information Science and Librarianship' Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2007 vol 58 no 2 pp 297-301.
40. J K Vanclay 'On the Robustness of the h-index' Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2007 vol 58 no 10 pp 1547-50.
41. T FFrandsen 'Journal Diffusion Factors: A Measure of Diffusion?'Aslib Proceedings2004 vol 56 no 1 pp 5-11.
42. T FFrandsen, R Rousseau & I Rowlands 'Diffusion Factors'Journal of Documentation2006 vol 62 no 1 pp 58-72.
43. IRowlands 'Journal Diffusion Factors: A New Approach to Measuring Research Influence'Aslib Proceedings2002 vol 54 no 2 pp 77-84.
44. L Yates 'Is Impact a Measure of Quality? Producing Quality Research and Producing Quality Indicators of Research in Australia' Australian Educational Researcher 2006 vol 33 pp 119-32.
45. Centre for the Study of Research Training & Impact Overall Education Journal Ranking by Esteem n.d. at www.newcastle.edu.au/centre/sorti/files/ Overall%20Esteem%20ranking.pdf.
46. Centre for the Study of Research Training & Impact Overall Education Journal Ranking by QScore n.d. at www.newcastle.edu.au/centre/sorti/files/ Overall%20QScore%20ranking.pdf.
47. Centre for the Study of Research Training & Impact Education Journal Banding Study: A Summary of Methodology 2007 at http://www.newcastle.edu.au/ centre/sorti/Banding/method.html.
48. J K Vanclay 'Ranking Forestry Journals Using the h-index' Journal of Informetrics 2008 vol 2 no 4 pp 326-34.
49. PJacso 'Deflated, Inflated and Phantom Citation Counts'Online Information Review2006 vol 29 no 5 pp 297-309.
50. ANoruzi 'Google Scholar: The New Generation of Citation Indexes'Libri2005 vol 55 pp 170-80.
51. BLane 'Research Review Heats Up: Government's RQF Overhaul has Data Rivals Jostling for Position'The Australian2008 January23p21.