The iceberg hypothesis revisited

Scientometrics

Volumn 85, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 443-461

  Lancho Barrantes, Bárbara S ^a   Guerrero Bote, Vicente P ^a   Moya Anegón, Félix ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXTREMADURA   (Spain)

^b CSIC   (Spain)

Author keywords

Citation analysis; Journal impact factor; Knowledge export; Scientometrics

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956893108     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-010-0209-5     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Egghe, L. (2009). Mathematical derivation of the impact factor distribution. Journal of Informetrics, 3(4), 290-295.
2. Garfield, E. (1979). Citation indexing. Its theory and application in science, technology and humanities. New York: Wiley.
3. Glänzel, W., & Moed, H. (2002). Journal impact measures in bibliometric research. Scientometrics, 53(2), 171-193.
4. Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2003). A new classification scheme of science fields and subfields designed for scientometric evaluation purposes. Scientometrics, 56(3), 257-367.
5. Guerrero-Bote, V. P., Zapico-Alonso, F., Espinosa-Calvo, M. E., Gómez-Crisóstomo, R., & Moya-Anegón, F. (2006). Binary pathfinder: An improvement to the Pathfinder algorithm. Information Processing and Management, 42(6), 1484-1490.
6. Guerrero-Bote, V. P., Zapico-Alonso, F., Espinosa-Calvo, M. E., Gómez-Crisóstomo, R., & Moya-Anegón, F. (2007). The iceberg hypothesis: import-export of knowledge between scientific subject categories. Scientometrics, 71(3), 423-441.
7. Lancho-Barrantes, B. S., Guerrero-Bote, V. P., & Moya-Anegón, F. (in press). What lies behind the averages and significance of citation indicators in different disciplines? Journal of Information Science.
8. Leydesdorff, L., & Bensman, S. (2006). Classification and powerlaws: The logarithmic transformation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(11), 1470-1486.
9. Lundberg, J. (2007). Lifting the crown-citation z-score. Journal of Informetrics, 1, 145-154.
10. Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science, 159, 56-63.
11. Moed, H. F. (2005). Citation analysis in research evaluation (p. 346). Dordrecht: Springer.
12. Moya-Anegón, F., Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., Corera-Álvarez, E., González-Molina, A., Hassan-Montero, Y., & Vargas-Quesada, B. (2008). Indicadores bibliométricos de la actividad científica española (2002-2006). Madrid: FECYT.
13. Moya-Anegón, F., Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., Vargas-Quesada, B., Corera-Álvarez, E., Muñoz-Fernández, F. J., González-Molina, A., et al. (2007). Coverage analysis of Scopus: a journal metric approach. Scientometrics, 73(1), 53-78.
14. Moya-Anegón, F., Vargas-Quesada, B., Herrero-Solana, V., Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., Corera-Álvarez, E., & Muñoz-Fernández, F. J. (2004). A new technique for building maps of large scientific domains based on the cocitation of classes and categories. Scientometrics, 61, 129-145.
15. Pinski, G., & Narin, F. (1976). Citation influence for journal aggregates of scientific publications: Theory, with application to the literature of physics. Information Processing and Management, 12(5), 297-312.
16. Podlubny, I. (2005). Comparison of scientific impact expressed by the number of citations in different fields of science. Scientometrics, 64(1), 95-99.
17. Pudovkin, A., & Garfield, E. (2002). Algorithmic procedure for finding semantically related journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(13), 1113-1119.
18. Schvaneveldt, R. W., Dearholt, D. W., & Durso, F. T. (1988). Graph theoretic foundations of Pathfinder networks. Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 15(4), 337-345.
19. Scimago Journal & Country Rank. (2008). SCImago Research Group. Accessed 26 March, 2009 from http://www. scimagojr. com/.
20. Sombatsompop, N., & Markpin, T. (2005). Making an equality of ISI impact factors for different subject fields. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(7), 676-683.
21. van Leeuwen, T. N., & Moed, H. F. (2002). Development and application of journal impact measures in the Dutch science system. Scientometrics, 53(2), 249-266.
22. van Leeuwen, T. N., Visser, M. S., Moed, H. F., Nederhof, T. J., & van Raan, A. F. J. (2003). The Holy Grail of science policy: Exploring and combining bibliometric tools in search of scientific excellence. Scientometrics, 57(2), 257-280.
23. Waltman, L., & van Eck, N. J. (2009). Some comments on Egghe's derivation of the impact factor distribution. Journal of Informetrics, 3(4), 363-366.
24. Wormell, I. (1998). Informetric analysis of the international impact of scientific journals: How 'International' are the international journals? Journal of Documentation, 54(5), 584-605.