Digital zoning of South African viticultural terroirs using bootstrapped decision trees on morphometric data and multitemporal SPOT images

Remote Sensing of Environment

Volumn 114, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 2940-2950

  Vaudour, E ^a,b   Carey, V A ^c   Gilliot, J M ^a,b  

^a UMR 1402 ECOSYS   (France)

^b CEMAGREF   (France)

^c STELLENBOSCH UNIVERSITY   (South Africa)

Author keywords

Decision trees; Digital zoning; Hyperstat; Monte Carlo; Multitemporal; SPOT; Viticultural terroirs

Indexed keywords

DIGITAL ZONING; HYPERSTAT; MONTE CARLO; MULTI-TEMPORAL; SPOT; VITICULTURAL TERROIRS;

COMPUTER GRAPHICS; FRUITS; MONTE CARLO METHODS; PIXELS; ZONING;

DECISION TREES;

BOOTSTRAPPING; CLIMBING PLANT; DECISION MAKING; DIGITAL MAPPING; MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS; MORPHOMETRY; PIXEL; SATELLITE DATA; SATELLITE IMAGERY; SPOT; VITICULTURE;

SOUTH AFRICA;

VITACEAE;

EID: 77956882980     PISSN: 00344257     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2010.08.001     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Breiman L., Friedman J., Olshen R., Stone C. Classification and regression trees 1984, Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton.
2. Brown de Colstoun E.C., Walthall C.L. Improving global scale land cover classifications with multi-directional POLDER data and a decision tree classifier. Remote Sensing of Environment 2006, 100:474-485.
3. Bui E.N., Moran C.J. A strategy to fill gaps in soil survey over large spatial extents: an example from the Murray-Darling basin of Australia. Geoderma 2003, 111:21-44.
4. Canty M.J. Image analysis, classification and change detection in remote sensing 2007, CRC Taylor and Francis, Boca Raton.
5. Canty M.J., Nielsen A.A. Automatic radiometric normalization of multitemporal satellite imagery with the iteratively re-weighted MAD transformation. Remote Sensing of Environment 2008, 112:1025-1036.
6. Canty M.J., Nielsen A.A., Schmidt M. Automatic radiometric normalization of multitemporal satellite imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment 2004, 91:441-451.
7. Carey V.A., Archer E., Barbeau G., Saayman D. The use of local knowledge relating to vineyard performance to identify viticultural terroirs in Stellenbosch and surrounds. Poster presented at ISHS Symposium Advances in Grape and Wine Research, September 2005, Venosa, Italy. Acta Horticulturae 2007, 754:385-392.
8. Carey V.A., Archer E., Barbeau G., Saayman D. Viticultural terroirs in Stellenbosch, South Africa. II. The interaction of Cabernet Sauvignon and Sauvignon blanc with environment. Journal International des Sciences de la Vigne et du Vin 2008, 42(4):185-201.
9. Carey V.A., Archer E., Barbeau G., Saayman D. Viticultural terroirs in Stellenbosch, South Africa. III. Spatialisation of viticultural and oenological potential for Cabernet Sauvignon and Sauvignon blanc by means of a preliminary model. Journal International des Sciences de la Vigne et du Vin 2009, 43(1):1-12.
10. Carey V.A., Saayman D., Archer E., Barbeau G., Wallace M. Viticultural terroirs in Stellenbosch, South Africa. I. The identification of natural terroir units. Journal International des Sciences de la Vigne et du Vin. 2008, 42(4):169-183.
11. Congalton R.G., Green K. Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data: Principal and practices 1999, Lewis Publishers, New York.
12. Conradie W.J., Carey V.A., Bonnardot V., Saayman D., Van Schoor L.H. Effect of different environmental factors on the performance of Sauvignon blanc grapevines in the Stellenbosch/Durbanville districts of South Africa. I. Geology, soil, climate, phenology and grape composition. South African Journal of Enology and Viticulture 2002, 3:62-71.
13. Coops N.C., Wulder M.A., White J.C. Integrating remotely sensed and ancillary data sources to characterize a mountain pine beetle infestation. Remote Sensing of Environment 2006, 105:83-97.
14. Dolédec, A.F., (1995). Recherche des composantes principales des terroirs viticoles afin d'élaborer un outil d'aide à la gestion au moyen d'observatoires et de traitements statistiques de données spatialisées. Application au vignoble champenois. PhD Thesis, Institut National Agronomique Paris-Grignon (now AgroParisTech), Paris, France.
15. Du Y., Teillet P., Cihlar J. Radiometric normalization of multitemporal high-resolution satellite images with quality control for land cover change detection. Remote Sensing of Environment 2002, 82:123-134.
16. Foody G. Classification accuracy comparison: hypothesis tests and the use of confidence intervals in evaluations of difference, equivalence and non-inferiority. Remote Sensing of Environment 2009, 113:1658-1663.
17. Friedl M.A., Brodley C.E. Decision tree classification of land cover from remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing of Environment 1997, 61:399-409.
18. Furby S.L., Campbell N.A. Calibrating images from different dates to 'like-values' digital counts. Remote Sensing of Environment 2001, 77:186-196.
19. Hansen M.K., Brown D.J., Dennison P.E., Graves S.A., Bricklemeyr R.S. Inductively mapping expert-derived soil-landscape units within dambo wetland catenae using multispectral and topographic data. Geoderma 2009, 150:72-84.
20. Javier Lozano F., Suárez-Seoane S., Nelly M., Luis E. A multi-scale approach for modeling fire occurrence probability using satellite data and classification trees: a case study in a mountainous Mediterranean region. Remote Sensing of Environment 2008, 112:708-719.
21. Jengo C. Rulegen v1.02 extension in ENVI 2004, ITT Visual Information Solutions User-Contributed Library.
22. Jensen J.R. Introductory digital image processing. A remote sensing perspective (pp. 198-226). Third edition 2005, Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.
23. Johnson L.F. Temporal stability of an NDVI-LAI relationship in a Napa Valley vineyard. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research 2003, 9:96-101.
24. Johnson L.F., Roczen D.E., Youkhana S.K., Nemani R.R., Bosch D.F. Mapping vineyard leaf area with multispectral satellite imagery. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 2003, 38:33-44.
25. Lagacherie P., Holmes S. Addressing geographical data errors in a classification tree soil unit prediction. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 1997, 11:183-198.
26. Lamb D., Weedon M., Bramley R. Using remote sensing to predict grape phenolics and colour at harvest in a Cabernet Sauvignon vineyard: Timing observations against vine phenology and optimising image resolution. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research 2004, 10:46-54.
27. Latifovic R., Olthof I. Accuracy assessment using sub-pixel fractional error matrices of global land cover products derived from satellite data. Remote Sensing of Environment 2004, 90:163-165.
28. Lawrence R., Bunn A., Powell S., Zambon M. Classification of remotely sensed imagery using stochastic gradient boosting as a refinement of classification tree analysis. Remote Sensing of Environment 2004, 90:331-336.
29. Lim T.S., Loh W.Y., Shih Y.S. A comparison of prediction accuracy, complexity and training time of thirty-three old and new classification algorithms. Machine Learning 2000, 40:203-229.
30. Loh W.Y. Classification and regression tree methods. Encyclopedia of statistics in quality and reliability 2008, 315-323. Wiley, New York. Ruggeri, Kenett, Faltin (Eds.).
31. Loh W.Y., Shih Y.S. Split selection methods in classification trees. Statistica Sinica 1997, 7:815-840.
32. Lucas R., Rowlands A., Brown A., Keyworth S., Bunting P. Rule-based classification of multi-temporal satellite imagery for habitat and land cover mapping. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing 2007, 62:165-185.
33. Minasny B., McBratney A. Incorporating taxonomic distance into spatial prediction and digital mapping of soil classes. Geoderma 2007, 142:285-293.
34. Moran C.J., Bui E.N. Spatial data mining for enhanced soil map modelling. International Journal Geographical Information Science 2002, 16(6):533-549.
35. Nielsen A.A., Conradsen K., Simpson J.J. Multivariate alteration detection (MAD) and MAF post-processing in multispectral, bitemporal image data: new approaches to change detection studies. Remote Sensing of Environment 1998, 64:1-19.
36. Pal M., Mather P.M. An assessment of the effectiveness of decision tree methods for land cover classification. Remote Sensing of Environment 2003, 46:554-565.
37. Parra P., Vaudour E. Contribution of very high resolution satellite remote sensing to the mapping of harvest zones in the Maipo Valley (Chile). SASEV/SAWWV. Proc. 28th Int. Conference on viticultural zoning, November 2004, Cape Town (South Africa). CD-Rom 2004.
38. Rogan J., Franklin J., Stow D., Miller J., Woodcock C., Roberts D. Mapping land cover modifications over large areas: a comparison of machine learning algorithms. Remote Sensing of Environment 2008, 112:2272-2283.
39. SAWIS (S A Wine Industry Information & Systems) A review of the wine of origin scheme (Accessed 10 August 2007). http://www.sawis.co.za/SAWISPortal/uploads/Wine%20of%20origin%20booklet2005.pdf.
40. Schwarz R. Predicting wine quality from terrain characteristics by regression trees. Cybergeo: European Journal of Geography http://www.cybergeo.eu/index361.html.
41. Sesnie S.E., Gessler P.E., Finegan B., Thessler S. Integrating Landsat TM and SRTM-DEM derived variables with decision trees for habitat classification and change detection in complex neotropical environments. Remote Sensing of Environment 2008, 112:2145-2159.
42. Steele B.M. Combining multiple classifiers: an application using spatial and remotely sensed information for land cover type mapping. Remote Sensing of Environment 2000, 74:545-556.
43. Taylor, J.A. (2004). Digital terroirs and precision viticulture: investigations into the application of information technology in Australian vineyards. PhD thesis, Univ. of Sidney.
44. Teillet P.M., Guindon B., Goodenough D.G. On the slope-aspect correction of multispectral scanner data. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing 1982, 8(2):84-106.
45. Tisseyre B., Ojeda H., Taylor J. New technologies and methodologies for site-specific viticulture. International Journal of Wine and Vine Research 2007, 41:63-76.
46. Van Niekerk A. Western Cape Digital Elevation Model: product description 2001, Centre for Geographical Analysis, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch.
47. Van Niel T.G., Mc Vicar T.R., Datt B. On the relationship between training sample size and data dimensionality: Monte Carlo analysis of broadband multi-temporal classification. Remote Sensing of Environment 2005, 98:468-480.
48. Vaudour, E., (2001). Les terroirs viticoles. Analyse spatiale et relation avec la qualité du raisin. Application au vignoble AOC des Côtes-du-Rhône méridionales. PhD Thesis, Institut National Agronomique Paris-Grignon (now AgroParisTech), Paris, France.
49. Vaudour E. The quality of grapes and wine in relation to geography: notions of terroir at various scales. Journal of Wine Research 2002, 13(2):117-141.
50. Vaudour E. Les terroirs viticoles 2003, Dunod, Paris.
51. Vaudour E. Remote sensing of Red Mediterranean soils: a case study in the viticultural Southern Rhone Valley (France) using SPOT satellite imagery. Geocarto International 2008, 23(3):197-216.
52. Vaudour E., Girard M.C., Brémond L.M., Lurton L. Caractérisation spatiale et constitution des raisins en AOC Côtes-du-Rhône méridionales (Bassin de Nyons-Valréas). Journal International Des Sciences De La Vigne Et Du Vin 1998, 32(4):169-182.
53. Vaudour E., Moeys J., Gilliot J.M., Coquet Y. Spatial retrieval of soil reflectance from SPOT multispectral data using the empirical line method. International Journal of Remote Sensing 2008, 29(19):5571-5584.
54. Vaudour E., Shaw A.B. A worldwide perspective on viticultural zoning. South African Journal of Enology and Viticulture 2005, 26(2):106-115.
55. Wassenaar T., Andrieux P., Baret F., Robbez-Masson J.M. Soil surface infiltration capacity classification based on the bi-directional reflectance distribution function sampled by aerial photographs. The case of vineyards in a Mediterranean area. Catena 2005, 62:94-110.
56. Wilson J.P., Gallant J.C. Terrain analysis: Principles and applications 2000, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
57. Xu M., Watanachaturaporn P., Varshney P., Arora M. Decision tree regression for soft classification of remote sensing data. Remote Sensing of Environment 2005, 97:322-336.