Coupling of neural activity and fMRI-BOLD in the motion area MT

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 28, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 1087-1094

  Lippert Michael T , M T ^a   Steudel, Thomas ^a   Ohl, Frank ^b   Logothetis, Nikos K ^a,c   Kayser, Christoph ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS   (Germany)

^b LEIBNIZ INSTITUTE FOR NEUROBIOLOGY   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Correlation; Local field potentials; Multi unit activity; Neurovascular coupling

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BLOOD OXYGENATION LEVEL DEPENDENT IMAGING; BRAIN ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MACACA; MOTION ANALYSIS SYSTEM; NERVE CELL; NERVE STIMULATION; NEUROIMAGING; NEUROTRANSMISSION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL DETECTION; SPIKE WAVE;

ANESTHESIA; ANIMALS; BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MACACA; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MOTION; NEURONS; PHOTIC STIMULATION;

EID: 77956879557     PISSN: 0730725X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2009.12.028     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Lauritzen M. Reading vascular changes in brain imaging: is dendritic calcium the key?. Nat Rev Neurosci 2005, 6:77-85.
2. Logothetis N.K. What we can do and what we cannot do with fMRI. Nature 2008, 453:869-878.
3. Nair D.G. About being BOLD. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 2005, 50:229-243.
4. Heeger D.J., Ress D. What does fMRI tell us about neuronal activity?. Nat Rev Neurosci 2002, 3:142-151.
5. Heeger D.J., Huk A.C., Geisler W.S., Albrecht D.G. Spikes versus BOLD: what does neuroimaging tell us about neuronal activity?. Nat Neurosci 2000, 3:631-633.
6. Mukamel R., Gelbard H., Arieli A., Hasson U., Fried I., Malach R. Coupling between neuronal firing, field potentials, and FMRI in human auditory cortex. Science 2005, 309:951-954.
7. Arthurs O.J., Williams E.J., Carpenter T.A., Pickard J.D., Boniface S.J. Linear coupling between functional magnetic resonance imaging and evoked potential amplitude in human somatosensory cortex. Neuroscience 2000, 101:803-806.
8. Kayser C., Kim M., Ugurbil K., Kim D.S., Konig P. A comparison of hemodynamic and neural responses in cat visual cortex using complex stimuli. Cereb Cortex 2004, 14:881-891.
9. Niessing J., Ebisch B., Schmidt K.E., Niessing M., Singer W., Galuske R.A. Hemodynamic signals correlate tightly with synchronized gamma oscillations. Science 2005, 309:948-951.
10. Logothetis N.K., Pauls J., Augath M., Trinath T., Oeltermann A. Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal. Nature 2001, 412:150-157.
11. Goense J.B., Logothetis N.K. Neurophysiology of the BOLD fMRI signal in awake monkeys. Curr Biol 2008, 18:631-640.
12. Caesar K., Thomsen K., Lauritzen M. Dissociation of spikes, synaptic activity, and activity-dependent increments in rat cerebellar blood flow by tonic synaptic inhibition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003, 100:16000-16005.
13. Viswanathan A., Freeman R.D. Neurometabolic coupling in cerebral cortex reflects synaptic more than spiking activity. Nat Neurosci 2007, 10:1308-1312.
14. Logothetis N.K. The neural basis of the blood-oxygen-level-dependent functional magnetic resonance imaging signal. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2002, 357:1003-1037.
15. Oeltermann A., Augath M.A., Logothetis N.K. Simultaneous recording of neuronal signals and functional NMR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 2007, 25:760-774.
16. Rauch A., Rainer G., Logothetis N. The effect of a serotonin induced dissociation between spiking and perisynaptic activity on BOLD fMRI. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008, 105(18):6759-6764.
17. Heeger D.J., Boynton G.M., Demb J.B., Seidemann E., Newsome W.T. Motion opponency in visual cortex. J Neurosci 1999, 19:7162-7174.
18. Dubner R., Zeki S.M. Response properties and receptive fields of cells in an anatomically defined region of the superior temporal sulcus in the monkey. Brain Res 1971, 35:528-532.
19. Qian N., Andersen R.A. Transparent motion perception as detection of unbalanced motion signals: II. Physiology. J Neurosci 1994, 14:7367-7380.
20. Snowden R.J., Treue S., Erickson R.G., Andersen R.A. The response of area MT and V1 neurons to transparent motion. J Neurosci 1991, 11:2768-2785.
21. Snowden R.J., Treue S., Andersen R.A. The response of neurons in areas V1 and MT of the alert rhesus monkey to moving random dot patterns. Exp Brain Res 1992, 88:389-400.
22. Logothetis N.K., Guggenberger H., Peled S., Pauls J. Functional imaging of the monkey brain. Nat Neurosci 1999, 2:555-562.
23. Gold L., Lauritzen M. Neuronal deactivation explains decreased cerebellar blood flow in response to focal cerebral ischemia or suppressed neocortical function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002, 99:7699-7704.
24. Mitzdorf U. Properties of the evoked potential generators: current source-density analysis of visually evoked potentials in the cat cortex. Int J Neurosci 1987, 33:33-59.
25. Juergens E., Guettler A., Eckhorn R. Visual stimulation elicits locked and induced gamma oscillations in monkey intracortical- and EEG-potentials, but not in human EEG. Exp Brain Res 1999, 129:247-259.
26. Krekelberg B., Albright T.D. Motion mechanisms in macaque MT. J Neurophysiol 2005, 93:2908-2921.
27. Qian N., Andersen R.A., Adelson E.H. Transparent motion perception as detection of unbalanced motion signals: III. Modeling. J Neurosci 1994, 14:7381-7392.
28. Lauritzen M., Gold L. Brain function and neurophysiological correlates of signals used in functional neuroimaging. J Neurosci 2003, 23:3972-3980.