Comparison of high definition oscillometric and Doppler ultrasonic devices for measuring blood pressure in anaesthetised cats

Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery

Volumn 12, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 731-737

  Petrič, Aleksandra Domanjko ^a   Petra, Zrimšek ^a   Jerneja, Sredenšek ^a   Alenka, Seliškar ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LJUBLJANA   (Slovenia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANESTHESIA; ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; CAT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DOPPLER FLOWMETRY; EVALUATION; FEMALE; FORELIMB; HINDLIMB; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; OSCILLOMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY; TAIL;

ANESTHESIA; ANIMALS; BLOOD PRESSURE DETERMINATION; CATS; FEMALE; FORELIMB; HINDLIMB; MALE; OSCILLOMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TAIL; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, DOPPLER;

EID: 77956874516     PISSN: 1098612X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfms.2010.04.007     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Binns S.H., Sisson D.D., Buoscio D.A., et al. Doppler ultrasonographic, oscillometric sphygmomanometric, and photoplethysmographic techniques for noninvasive blood pressure measurement in anesthetized cats. J Vet Intern Med 1995, 9:405-414.
2. Jepson R.E., Hartley V.H., Mendl M., et al. A comparison of CAT Doppler and oscillometric Memoprint machine for non-invasive blood pressure measurement in conscious cats. J Feline Med Surg 2005, 7:147-152.
3. Bodey A.R., Young L.E., Bartram D.H., Diamond M.J., Michell A.R. A comparison of direct and indirect (oscillometric) measurements of arterial blood pressure in anaesthetised dogs, using tail and limb cuffs. Res Vet Science 1994, 57:265-269.
4. Gains M.J., Grodecky K.M., Jacobs R.M., Dyson D., Foster R.A. Comparison of Direct and Indirect Blood Pressure Measurements in Anesthetised Dogs. Can J Vet Res 1995, 59:238-240.
5. Stepien R.L., Rapoport G.S., Henik R.A., Wenholy L., Thomas C.B. Comparative Diagnostic Test Characteristics of Oscillometric and Doppler Ultrasonographic Methods in the Detection of Systolic Hypertension in Dogs. J Vet Intern Med 2003, 17:65-72.
6. Sawyer D.C., Guikema A.H., Siegel E.M. Evaluation of a new oscillometric blood pressure monitor in isoflurane-anesthetised dogs 2004, 1:27-39.
7. Haberman C.E., Kang C.W., Morgan J.D., Brown S.A. Evaluation of oscillometric and Doppler ultrasonic methods of indirect blood pressure estimation in conscious dogs. Can J Vet Res 2006, 70:211-217.
8. Deflandre C.J.A., Hellebrekers L.J. Clinical evaluation of the Surgivet V60046, a non invasive blood pressure monitor in anaesthetized dogs. Vet Anaesth Analg 2008, 35:13-21.
9. Branson K.R., Wagner-Mann C.C., Mann F.A. Evaluation of an oscillometric blood pressure monitor on anesthetized cats and the effect of cuff placement and fur on accuracy. Vet Surg 1997, 26:347-353.
10. Pedersen K.M., Butler M.A., Ersboll A.K., Pedersen H.D. Evaluation of an oscillometric blood pressure monitor for use in anesthetized cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2002, 1:646-650.
11. Caulkett N.A., Cantwell S.L., Houston D.M. A comparison of indirect blood pressure monitoring techniques in the anesthetized cat. Vet Surg 1998, 27:370-377.
12. Sander C., Hörauf A., Reusch C. Indirect blood pressure measurement in cats with diabetes mellitus, chronic nephropathy and hypetrophic cardiomyopathy. Tierarztl Prax K Klientiere Heimtiere 1998, 26:110-118.
13. Egner B. Blood pressure measurement: Technology and Avoidance of Measurement Error. Kleintier Konkret - J Small Anim Practitioner 2006, 4:18-23.
14. Bland J.M., Altman D.G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. The Lancet 1986, 1(8476):307-310.
15. Bland J.M., Altman D.G. Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method of measurements is misleading. The Lancet 1995, 346:1085-1087.
16. Petrie A., Watson P. Additional Topics. Statistics for veterinary and animal science 1999, 168-181. Blackwell Science, Oxford. A. Petrie, P. Watson (Eds.).
17. Twormey P. How do we really compare methods in the clinical laboratory?. Statistics workshop & clinics, Euro Med Lab 2005, Glasgow: May 8-12th.
18. Jones R.G., Payne R.B. Analytical methods: control and comparison. Clinical Investigation and Statistics in Laboratory Medicine 1997, 27-65. ACB Venture Publications, London. R.G. Jones, R.B. Payne (Eds.).
19. Grandy J.L., Dunlop C.I., Hodgson D.S., et al. Evaluation of the Doppler ultrasonic method for measuring systolic arterial blood pressure in cats. Am J Vet Res 1992, 53:1166-1169.
20. Mark J.B., Slaughter T.F., Reves J.G. Cardiovascular monitoring. Anaesthesia 2000, 1117-1206. Churchill Livingstone, Philadelphia. 5th. R.D. Miller (Ed.).