Water body and riparian buffer strip characteristics in a vineyard area to support aquatic pesticide exposure assessment

Science of the Total Environment

Volumn 408, Issue 22, 2010, Pages 5405-5413

  Ohliger, Renja ^a   Schulz, Ralf ^a  

^a France   (Germany)

Author keywords

Exposure; Field survey; Pesticide; Probabilistic exposure assessment; Riparian buffer strips

Indexed keywords

BUFFER STRIP; CONCENTRATED FLOW; DENSE VEGETATION; DEPTH RATIO; DETERMINISTIC APPROACH; DETERMINISTIC MODELS; EXPOSURE; EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT; EXPOSURE ESTIMATION; FIELD SURVEYS; GEO-DATA; GERMANY; GROUND VEGETATION; LANDSCAPE CHARACTERISTIC; MEDIAN VALUE; PESTICIDE EXPOSURE; PESTICIDE RUNOFF; PROBABILISTIC APPROACHES; PROBABILISTIC EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT; RIPARIAN BUFFER STRIPS; RIPARIAN VEGETATION; SHEETFLOWS; SPRAY DRIFT; STUDY AREAS; VEGETATED BUFFER STRIPS; VEGETATION DENSITY; VEGETATION TYPE; WATERBODIES;

PESTICIDES; RUNOFF; SURVEYS;

VEGETATION;

PESTICIDE;

ASSESSMENT METHOD; FIELD SURVEY; LAMINAR FLOW; PESTICIDE; POLLUTION EFFECT; POLLUTION EXPOSURE; PROBABILITY; RIPARIAN VEGETATION; RUNOFF; SURFACE WATER; VEGETATION COVER; VINEYARD;

ARTICLE; DENSITY; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; EROSION; GERMANY; HYDROLOGY; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RIPARIAN ECOSYSTEM; SHRUB; VEGETATION; VINEYARD; WATER SUPPLY;

CROPS, AGRICULTURAL; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; FRESH WATER; PESTICIDES; VITIS; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL; WATER POLLUTION, CHEMICAL; WINE;

GERMANY;

EID: 77956874058     PISSN: 00489697     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.08.025     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Abu-Zreig M., Rudra R.P., Whiteley H.R., Lalonde M.N., Kaushik N.K. Phosphorus removal in vegetated filter strips. J of Envrion Qual 2003, 32:613-619.
2. Altmayer B., Twertek M., Paetzold M., Laronche J.S. Einträge von Pflanzenschutzmitteln in Gewässer - Situation im Weinbau und Gegenmaßnahmen. Gesunde Pflanzen 2003, 6:161-168.
3. Bach M., Frede H.-G. Schutzfunktionen von Uferstreifen im Mittelgebirgsraum gegen PSM-Einträge in Fließgewässer. Mitteilungen Biologische Bundesanstalt Land - und Forstwirtschaft 1997, 330:95-107.
4. Bach M., Fabis J., Frede H.G. Filterwirkung von Uferstreifen für Stoffeinträge in Gewässer in unterschiedlichen Landschaftsräumen 1997, DVWK, Bonn.
5. Bach M., Fabis J., Frede H.G., Herzog I. Kartierung der potentiellen Filterfunktion von Uferstreifen. 1.Teil. Methodik und Kartierung. Zeitschrift für Kulturtechnik und Landentwicklung 1994, 35:148-154.
6. Bach M., Fabis J., Frede H.G., Herzog I. Kartierung der potentiellen Filterfunktion von Uferstreifen. 2. Teil. Kartierung des Flußeinzugsgebietes im Mittelgebirgsraum. Zeitschrift für Kulturtechnik und Landentwicklung 1994, 35:155-164.
7. BVL Folienserie: Pflanzenschutz und Naturhaushalt - Was man darüber wissen sollte 2009, Available from: http://www.bvl.bund.de/cln_007/nn_803312/DE/04__Pflanzenschutzmittel/08__UmweltGesundheitNUmweltGesund/03__folienserie/folienserie__node.html__nnn=true.
8. DEFRA. Local environment risk assessment for pesticides - Broadcast air-assistet sprayers. 2002. Available from: http://www.pesticides.gov.uk/uploadedfiles/Web_Assets/PSD/LERAP_Orchard(1).pdf (2009).
9. Dosskey M.G., Helmers M.J., Eisenhauer D.E., Franti T.G., Hoagland K.D. Assessment of concentrated flow through riparian buffers. J Soil Water Conserv 2002, 57:336-343.
10. FOCUS. FOCUS surface water scenarios in the EU evaluation process under 91/414/EEC. Report of the FOCUS working group on surface water scenarios, EC Document Reference SANCO/4802/2001-rev.2. 2001.
11. FOCUS. Landscape and mitigation factors in aquatic risk assessment. Volume 2. Detailed technical reviews. Report of the FOCUS working group on landscape and mitigation factors in ecological risk assessment, EC Document Reference SANCO/10422/2005 v2.0. 2007.
12. Ganzelmeier H., Rautmann D., Spangenberg R., Streloke M., Herrmann M., Wenzelburger H.-J., et al. Studies of the spray drift of plant protection products. Mitteilungen aus der Biologischen Bundesanstalt für Land- und Forstwirtschaft 1995, Blackwell Scientific Publisher, Berlin.
13. Gill S.L., Spurlock F.C., Goh K.S., Ganapathy C. Vegetated ditches as a management practice in irrigated alfalfa. Environ Monit Assess 2008, 144:261-267.
14. Großmann D. Konzept zur Bewertung des Eintrags von Pflanzenschutzmitteln in Oberflächen- und Grundwasser unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Oberflächenabflusses (Dokumentation zum Modell EXPOSIT). 1. Revision zur Dokumentation vom 27.09.2001. 2008. Available from: http://www.bvl.bund.de/nn_492088/DE/04__Pflanzenschutzmittel/00__doks__downloads/zul__umwelt__exposit__dok,templateId=raw,property=publicationFile.pdf/zul_umwelt_exposit_dok.pdf (2009).
15. Hart A. Probabilistic risk assessment for pesticides in Europe: implementation and research needs. Report of the European workshop on Probabilistic Risk Assessment for the Environmental Impacts of Plant Protection Products (EUPRA) 2001.
16. Hewitt A.J. Drift filtration By natural and artificial collectors: a literature review 2001, Available from: http://www.agdrift.com/PDF_FILES/drift%20filtration.PDF (2009).
17. Kreuzig R., Höltge S., Brunotte J., Berenzen N., Wogram J., Schulz R. Test-plot studies on runoff of sulfonamides from manured soils after sprinkler irrigation. Environ Toxicol Chem 2005, 24:777-781.
18. Lazzaro L., Otto S., Zanin G. Role of hedgerows in intercepting spray drift: evaluation and modelling of the effects. Agric Ecosyst Environ 2008, 123:317-327.
19. LWG-RLP. Wassergesetz für das Land Rheinland-Pfalz in der Fassung der Bekanntmachung vom 2004, 53. Januar, Gesetz und Verordnungsblatt.
20. Muscutt A.D., Harris G.L., Bailey S.W., Davies D.B. Buffer zones to improve water quality: a review of their potential use in UK agriculture. Agric Ecosyst Environ 1993, 45:59-77.
21. Otto S., Vianello M., Infantino A., Zanin G., Di Guardo A. Effect of a full-grown vegetative filter strip on herbicide runoff: maintaining of filter capacity over time. Chemosphere 2008, 71:74-82.
22. Patty L., Benoît R., Gril J.J. The use of grassed buffer strips to remove pesticides, nitrate and soluble phosphorus compounds from runoff water. Pest Sci 1997, 49:243-251.
23. Pätzold S., Klein C., Brummer G. Run-off transport of herbicides during natural and simulated rainfall and its reduction by vegetated filter strips. Soil Use Manage 2007, 23:294-305.
24. Probst M., Berenzen N., Lentzen-Godding A., Schulz R. Scenario-based simulation of runoff-related pesticide entries into small streams on a landscape level. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 2005, 62:145-159.
25. Rautmann D., Streloke M., Winkler R. New basic drift values in the authorization procedure for plant protection products. Mitteilungen aus der biologischen Bundesanstalt für Land- und Forstwirtschaft 2001, 383:133-141.
26. Reichenberger S., Bach M., Skitschak A., Frede H.G. Mitigation strategies to reduce pesticide inputs into ground- and surface water and their effectiveness; a review. Sci Total Environ 2007, 384:1-35.
27. Roßberg D, Ipach R. NEPTUN 2006 - Weinbau. Statistische Erhebung zur Anwendung von Pflanzenschutzmitteln in der Praxis. Berichte aus der Biologischen Bundesanstalt für Land- und Forstwirtschaft. 2007;140.
28. Schulz R. Rainfall-induced sediment and pesticide input from orchards into the Lourens River, Western Cape, South Africa: importance of a single event. Water Res 2001, 35:1869-1876.
29. Schulz R., Elsaesser D., Ohliger R., Stehle S., Zenker K. Probabilistische Bewertung des Umweltrisikos von Pflanzenschutzmitteln - Umsetzung der georeferenzierten probabilistischen Risikobewertung in den Vollzug des PflSchG - Pilotphase für den Expositionspfad 'Abdrift' ausgehend von Dauerkulturen. UBA-Texte 2008, 47.
30. Schulz R., Stehle S., Elsaesser D., Matezki S., Müller A., Neumann M., et al. Geodata-based probabilistic risk assessment and management of pesticides in Germany: a conceptual framework. Integr Environ Assess and Manag 2009, 5:69-97.
31. Statistisches Landesamt RLP. Bodennutzung landwirtschaftlicher Betriebe 2007. Endgültiges Ergebnis der Bodennutzungserhebung. Statistische Berichte, 2008.
32. Ucar T., Hall F.R. Windbreaks as a pesticide drift mitigation strategy: a review. Pest Manag Sci 2001, 57:663-675.
33. Van de Zande J.C., Michielsen J.M.G.P., Stallinga H., De Jong A. The effect of windbreak height and air assistance on exposure of surface water via spray drift. The BCPC Conference - Pests & Diseases 2000, 91-96. 91-6.
34. Van de Zande J.C., Heijne B., Wenneker M. Driftreductie bij bespuitingen in de fruitteelt (stand van zaken december 2001). IMAG Rapport 2001, 19.
35. Vellidis G., Lowrance R., Gay P., Wauchope R.D. Herbicide transport in a restored riparian forest buffer system. Trans ASAE 2002, 45:89-97.
36. Vianello M., Vischetti C., Scarponi L., Zanin G. Herbicide losses in runoff events from a field with a low slope: role of a vegetative filter strip. Chemosphere 2005, 61:717-725.
37. Wenneker M., Heijne B., Van de Zande J.C. Effect of natural windbreaks on drift reduction in orchard spraying. Comm Agr Appl Biol Sci 2005, 70:961-970.
38. Wogram J. Ecological characterisation of small streams in northern and central Germany. Linking aquatic exposure and effects: risk assessment of pesticides 2010, 250-268. CRC Press, Boca Raton, London, New York. T. Brock, A. Alix, C. Brown, E. Capri, B. Gottesbüren, F. Heimbach, C. Lythgo, R. Schulz, M. Streloke (Eds.).
39. Wolf T.M., Caldwell B.C., Pederson J.L., Cessna A.J. Interaction of riparian vegetation and zozzle type for drift deposit reduction. Asp Appl Biol 2004, 71:183-190.
40. Zhang X., Liu X., Zhang M., Dahlgren R.A., Eitzel M. A review of vegetated buffers and a meta-analysis of their mitigation efficacy in reducing nonpoint source pollution. J Environ Qual 2010, 39:76-84.