Performance evaluation and uncertainty measurement in irrigation scheduling soil water-balance approach

Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering

Volumn 136, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 732-743

  Prats, Alberto García ^a   Picó, Santiago Guillem ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE VALÈNCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

FAO procedures; Hydraulic soil properties; Irrigation schedule; Performance evaluation; Soil water balance; Uncertainty measurement

Indexed keywords

FAO PROCEDURES; HYDRAULIC SOIL PROPERTIES; IRRIGATION SCHEDULE; PERFORMANCE EVALUATION; SOIL-WATER BALANCE; UNCERTAINTY MEASUREMENTS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; FORESTRY; FUNCTION EVALUATION; HYDRAULICS; IRRIGATION; MONTE CARLO METHODS; SCHEDULING; SOIL MOISTURE; STOCHASTIC MODELS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; UNDERWATER SOILS; WATER SUPPLY;

SOIL SURVEYS;

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; BOOTSTRAPPING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; IRRIGATION SYSTEM; MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL MODEL; PEDOTRANSFER FUNCTION; PERCOLATION; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; PRECIPITATION (CLIMATOLOGY); RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; SOIL WATER; TIME DEPENDENT BEHAVIOR; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; WATER BUDGET;

EID: 77956865346     PISSN: 07339437     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000245     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Allen R.G. Pereira L.S. Raes D. Smith M. Crop evapotranspiration: Guidelines for computing crop requirements. Irrigation and drainage Paper No. 56 1998FAO, Rome.
2. Doorenbos J. Kassam A.H. Yield response to water. FAO irrigation and drainage Paper No. 33 1979FAO, Rome.
3. Doorenbos J. Pruitt W.O. Crop water requirements. Irrigation and drainage Paper No. 24, (rev.) 1977FAO, Rome.
4. Efron B. Bootstrap methods: Another look at the jackknife. Ann. Stat. 1979, 7(1):1-26. ASTSC7, 0090-5364, 10.1214/aos/1176344552.
5. Efron B. Tibshirani R.J. An introduction to the bootstrap 1993., Chapman & Hall, London.
6. Hanks R.J. Model for predicting plant yield as influenced by water use. Agron. J. 1974, 66:660-664. AGJOAT, 0002-1962.
7. Hashimoto T. Stedinger J.R. Loucks D.P. Reliability, resiliency and vulnerability criteria for water resource system performance evaluation. Water Resour. Res. 1982, 18(1):14-20. WRERAQ, 0043-1397, 10.1029/WR018i001p00014.
8. Jensen J.W. Water consumption by agricultural plants. Water deficit and plant growth 1968, 2:1-22. T. Kozlowski, Vol.,, ed., Academic, San Diego.
9. Mujumdar P.P. Mathematical tools for irrigation water management an overview. Water Int. 2002, 27(1):47-57. WAINEL, 0250-8060, 10.1080/02508060208686977.
10. Raes D. BUDGET-A soil water and salt balance model. Reference manual 2004, ., version 6.0, Faculty of Agricultural and Applied Biological Sciences, Institute for Land and Water Management, Leuven, Belgium.
11. Raes D. Geerts S. Kipkorir E. Wellens J. Sahli A. Simulation of yield decline as a result of water stress with a robust soil water balance model. Agric. Water Manage. 2006, 81(3):335-357. AWMADF, 0378-3774, 10.1016/j.agwat.2005.04.006.
12. Savage S.L. Decision making with insight 2003, ., Thomson-Brooks/Cole, Belmont, N.C.
13. Saxton K. Rawls W.J. Soil water characteristic estimates by texture and organic matter for hydrologic solutions. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2006, 70:1569-1578. SSSJD4, 0361-5995, 10.2136/sssaj2005.0117.
14. Saxton K.E. Rawls W.J. Romberger J.S. Papendick R.I. Estimating generalized soil-water characteristics from texture. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1986, 50(4):1031-1036. SSSJD4, 0361-5995.
15. Irrigation water requirements. National engineering handbook, Part 623 1993, SCS, Soil Conservation Service, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.
16. Smith M. CROPWAT, a computer program for irrigation planning and management. FAO irrigation and drainage Paper No. 46 1992, FAO, Rome.