Open capture-recapture models with heterogeneity: II. Jolly-Seber model

Biometrics

Volumn 66, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 883-890

  Pledger, Shirley ^a   Pollock, Kenneth H ^b   Norris, James L ^c  

^a VICTORIA UNIVERSITY OF WELLINGTON   (New Zealand)

^b NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Abundance; Capture recapture; Finite mixture model; Heterogeneity; Jolly Seber; Maximum likelihood; Non parametric MLE; Open populations; Schwarz Arnason

Indexed keywords

ABUNDANCE; CAPTURE-RECAPTURE; FINITE MIXTURE MODELING; HETEROGENEITY; JOLLY-SEBER; MA XIMUM LIKELIHOODS; MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD; NON-PARAMETRIC MLE; NONPARAMETRICS; OPEN POPULATION; SCHWARZ-ARNASON;

MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION;

ABUNDANCE; CAPTURE METHOD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; HETEROGENEITY; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ANALYSIS; PROBABILITY; RECRUITMENT (POPULATION DYNAMICS); SURVIVAL;

EID: 77956863322     PISSN: 0006341X     EISSN: 15410420     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2009.01361.x     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Akaike, H. (1973). Information theory as an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In Second International Symposium on Information Theory, B. N. Petrov and F. Csaki (eds 267 281. Budapest : Academiai Kiado.
2. Boulinier, T., Nichols, J. D., Sauer, J. R., Hines, J. E., and Pollock, K. H. (1998). Estimating species richness: The importance of heterogeneity in species detectability. Ecology 79, 1018 1028.
3. Burnham, K. P. and Anderson, D. R. (2002). Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach, 2nd edition. New York : Springer-Verlag.
4. Carothers, A. D. (1973). The effects of unequal catchability on Jolly-Seber estimates. Biometrics 29, 79 100.
5. Carothers, A. D. (1979). Quantifying unequal catchability and its effect on survival estimates in an actual population. Journal of Animal Ecology 48, 863 869.
6. Cormack, R. M. (1964). Estimates of survival from the sighting of marked animals. Biometrika 51, 429 438.
7. Cormack, R. M. (1992). Interval estimation for mark-recapture studies of closed populations. Biometrics 48, 567 576.
8. Crosbie, S. F. and Manly, B. F. J. (1985). Parsimonious modeling of capture-mark-recapture studies. Biometrics 41, 385 398.
9. Dorazio, R. M. and Royle, J. A. (2003). Mixture models for estimating the size of a closed population when capture rates vary among individuals. Biometrics 59, 351 364.
10. Efford, M. G. (1998). Demographic consequences of sex-biased dispersal in a population of brushtail possums. Journal of Animal Ecology 67, 503 517.
11. Fewster, R. M. and Jupp, P. E. (2009). Inference on population size in binomial detectability models. To appear in Biometrika.
12. Holzmann, H. and Munk, A. (2008). Rejoinder to "On the nonidentifiability of population sizes." Biometrics 64, 979 981.
13. Holzmann, H., Munk, A., and Zucchini, W. (2006). On identifiability in capture-recapture models. Biometrics 62, 934 939.
14. Huggins, R. M. (1989). On the statistical analysis of capture experiments. Biometrika 76, 133 140.
15. Hwang, W.-D. and Chao, A. (1995). Quantifying the effects of unequal catchabilities on Jolly-Seber estimates via sample coverage. Biometrics 51, 128 141.
16. Jolly, G. M. (1965). Explicit estimates from capture-recapture data with both death and immigration - stochastic model. Biometrika 52, 225 247.
17. Lebreton, J.-D., Burnham, K. P., Clobert, J., and Anderson, D. R. (1992). Modelling survival and testing biological hypotheses using marked animals: A unified approach with case studies. Ecological Monographs 62, 67 118.
18. Lindsay B. G. (1995). Mixture Models: Theory, Geometry and Applications. NSF-CBMS Regional Conference Series in Probability and Statistics 5. Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Hayward, California.
19. Link, W. A. (2003). Nonidentifiability of population size from capture-recapture data with heterogeneous capture probabilities. Biometrics 59, 1123 1130.
20. Mao, C. X. (2008). On the nonidentifiability of population sizes. Biometrics 64, 977 979.
21. Morgan, B. J. T. and Ridout, M. S. (2008). A new mixture model for capture heterogeneity. Applied Statistics 57, 433 446.
22. Norris, J. L. III and Pollock, K. H. (1995). A capture-recapture model with heterogeneity and behavioural response. Environmental and Ecological Statistics 2, 305 313.
23. Norris, J. L. and Pollock, K. H. (1996). Nonparametric MLE under two closed capture-recapture models with heterogeneity. Biometrics 52, 639 649.
24. Pledger, S. (2000). Unified maximum likelihood estimates for closed capture-recapture models using mixtures. Biometrics 56, 434 442.
25. Pledger, S. (2005). The performance of mixture models in heterogeneous closed population capture-recapture. Biometrics 61, 868 876.
26. Pledger, S. and Efford, M. G. (1998). Correction of bias due to heterogeneous capture probability in capture-recapture studies of open populations. Biometrics 54, 888 898.
27. Pledger, S., Pollock, K. H., and Norris J. L. (2003). Open capture-recapture models with heterogeneity: I. Cormack-Jolly-Seber model. Biometrics 59, 786 794.
28. Pollock, K. H., Nichols, J. D., Brownie, C., and Hines, J. E. (1990). Statistical inference for capture-recapture experiments. Wildlife Monographs 107, 3 97.
29. Pradel, R. (1996). Utilization of capture-mark-recapture for the study of recruitment and population growth. Biometrics 52, 703 709.
30. R Development Core Team 2007). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org.
31. Sanathanan, L. (1972). Estimation of the size of a multinomial population. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 43, 142 152.
32. Schwarz, C. J. and Arnason, A. N. (1996). A general methodology for the analysis of capture-recapture experiments in open populations. Biometrics 52, 860 873.
33. Seber, G. A. F. (1965). A note on the multiple-recapture census. Biometrika 52, 249 259.
34. Self, S. G. and Liang, K.-Y. (1987). Asymptotic properties of maximum likelihood estimators and likelihood ratio tests under nonstandard conditions. Journal of the American Statistical Association 82, 605 610.