The UK position statement on forensic speaker comparison: A rejoinder to rose and morrison

International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 143-152

  French, Peter ^a   Nolan, Francis ^b   Foulkes, Paul ^a   Harrison, Philip ^a   McDougall, Kirsty ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956862619     PISSN: 17488885     EISSN: 17488893     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1558/ijsll.v17i1.143     Document Type: Note

References (14)

1. Bernard, J. R. (1967) Some measurements of some sounds of Australian English. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Sydney.
2. Bernard, J. R. L. (1970) Toward the acoustic specification of Australian English. Zeitschrif für Phonetik 23: 113-128.
3. Clyne, M. Eisikovits, E. and Tollfree, L.F. (2001) Ethnic varieties of Australian English. In D. Blair and P. Collins (eds) English in Australia (pp. 223-238). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
4. Cox, F. M. (1999) Vowel change in Australian English. Phonetica 56: 1-27.
5. Cox, F. and Palethorpe, S. (2001) Te changing face of Australian English vowels. In D. Blair and P. Collins (eds) English in Australia (pp. 17-44). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
6. Cox, F. M. and S. Palethorpe (2006) Some phonetic characteristics of Lebanese Australian English. Paper presented at the Australian Linguistic Society Conference. Brisbane, 7-9 July.
7. French, J. P. and Harrison, P. (2007) Position statement concerning use of impressionistic likelihood terms in forensic speaker comparison cases. International Journal of Speech Language and the Law 14: 137-144.
8. Laver, J. (1980) Te Phonetic Description of Voice Quality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Laver, J. (1994) Principles of Phonetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Loakes, D. (2006) A Forensic Phonetic Investigation into the Speech Patterns of Identical and Non-Identical Twins. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Melbourne.
11. Robertson, J. (2007) Forensic Speech Science from a Police Perspective. Paper presented at the Australian Research Council Network in Human Communication Science Workshop: FSI not CSI: Perspectives in State-of-the-Art Forensic Speaker Recognition, Sydney.
12. Rose, P. (2006) Accounting for Correlation in Linguistic-Acoustic Likelihood Ratio-based Forensic Speaker Discrimination, Speaker and Language Recognition Workshop, 2006. IEEE Odyssey pp.1-8, 28-30 June 2006.
13. Rose, P. (2007) Going and getting it - Forensic speaker recognition from the perspective of a traditional practitioner-researcher. Paper presented at the Australian Research Council Network in Human Communication Science Workshop: FSI not CSI - Perspectives in State-of-the-Art Forensic Speaker Recognition, Sydney. http:// forensic-voice-comparison.net/documents.
14. Rose, P., & Morrison, G. (2009). A response to the UK Position Statement on forensic speaker comparison. International Journal of Speech Language and the Law 16(1): 139-163.