Enacting rural sociology: Or what are the creativity claims of the engaged sciences?

Sociologia Ruralis

Volumn 50, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 311-330

  Lowe, Philip ^a,b  

^a NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b Scientific Committee   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DOCUMENTARY SOURCE; HISTORICAL GEOGRAPHY; RURAL HISTORY; RURAL SOCIETY; SOCIAL HISTORY; TWENTIETH CENTURY;

EUROPE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 77956850230     PISSN: 00380199     EISSN: 14679523     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2010.00522.x     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Alpert H. The growth of social research in the United States. The Human Meaning of the Social Sciences 1959, 79-80. Lerner D. Pp, in, ed., New York, Meridian Books
2. Alphandery P, Séncébé Y. L'emergence de la sociologie rurale en France 1945-1967. Etudes Rurales 2009, 183:23-40. pp.
3. Bailey LH. The Macmillan Company). The Country-Life Movement in the United States 1911, New York
4. Banfield EC. The moral basis of a backward society 1958, Glencoe, Illinois, Free Press
5. Behrman G. The Most Noble Adventure: The Marshall Plan and the Time When America Helped Save Europe 2007, New York, Free Press
6. Brunner E de S. The Growth of a Science: A Half Century of Rural Sociological Research in the United States 1957, New York, Harper and Brothers
7. Brunner, E de S, Yang EHP. Rural America and the Extension Service: A History and Critique of the Cooperative Agricultural and Home Economics Extension Service 1949, New York, Columbia University
8. Brunner E de S, Sanders IT, Ensminger D. Farmers of the World: The Development of Agricultural Extension 1945, eds, New York, Columbia University Press
9. Buttel FH. Agricultural structure and rural ecology: toward a political economy of rural development. Sociologia Ruralis 1980, 20:44-62. pp.
10. Collins R. Why the social sciences won't become high-consensus, rapid-discovery sciences. Sociological Forum 1994, 9:155-177. pp.
11. Constandse AK. In memoriam Evert Willem Hofstee. Sociologia Ruralis 1988, 28:3-6. pp.
12. Constandse AK, Hofstee EW. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Rural Sociology In Action 1964
13. Deverre C. Robert Redfield et l'Invention des Sociétés Paysannes. Etudes Rurales 2009, 183:41-50. pp.
14. Ellwood DW. The limits of Americanisation and the emergence of an alternative model: The Marshall Plan in Emilia-Romagna. The Americanisation of European Business: The Marshall Plan and the Transfer of US Management Models 1998, 149-168. Kipping MBjarnar O. Pp., in, eds., London, Routledge
15. Draft of constitution. Sociologia Ruralis 1960, 1:77-81. European Society for Rural Sociology, pp.
16. Fairweather JR, Gilles JL. A content analysis of 'Rural Sociology' and 'Sociologia Ruralis'. Sociologia Ruralis 1982, 22:311-313. pp., and
17. Report of the Fourth Meeting of the Ad Hoc Working Party on Rural Sociological Problems in Europe. Sociologia Ruralis 1963, 3:203-250. FAO Secretariat, pp.
18. Working party on rural sociological problems in Europe: review of a decade of development. Sociologia Ruralis 1969, 9:321-331. FAO Secretariat, pp.
19. Friedland WH. Who killed rural sociology? A case study in the political economy of knowledge production. International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food 2010, 17(1):72-88. pp.
20. Galpin CJ. The Century Co. Rural Life 1918, New York
21. Gilbert J. Agrarian intellectuals in a democratizing state: a collective biography of USDA leaders in the intended New Deal. The Countryside in the Age of the Modern State: Political Histories of Rural America 2001, 232-244. Stock CMJohnston RD. Pp., in, eds., Ithaca, Cornell University Press
22. Gilbert J. Rural sociology and democratic planning in the third New Deal. Agricultural History 2008, 82:422-444. pp.
23. Gilbert J, Howe C. Beyond "State vs. Society": theories of the state and New Deal agricultural policies. American Sociological Review 1991, 56:204-220. pp.
24. Gourvish T, Tiratsoo N. Missionaries and Managers: United States Technical Assistance and European Management Education 1945-60 1998, eds, Manchester, Manchester University Press
25. Hacking I. Representing and Interviewing: introductory topics in the philosophy of natural science 1983, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
26. Havens AE. Methodological issues in the study of development. Sociologia Ruralis 1972, 12:252-272. pp.
27. Heffernan WD. Sociological dimensions of agricultural structures in the United States. Sociologia Ruralis 1972, 12:481-499. pp.
28. Hoffer CR. Acceptance of Approved Farming Practices Among Farmers of Dutch Descent 1942, East Lansing, Michigan State University AES
29. Hofstee EW. Rural sociological research and its importance for the betterment of rural life. Christus Rex 1959, 13:189-202. part 3) pp.
30. Hofstee EW. Introduction. Sociologia Ruralis 1960a, 1:3-6. pp.
31. Hofstee EW. Rural social organisation. Sociologia Ruralis 1960b, 1:105-117. pp.
32. Hofstee EW. Rural sociology in Europe. Rural Sociology 1963, 28:329-341. pp.
33. Hofstee EW. Development and rural social structure. Sociologia Ruralis 1968, 8:240-255. pp.
34. Hofstee EW. The relations between sociology and policy. Sociologia Ruralis 1970, 10:331-345. pp.
35. Holdcroft LE. The Rise and Fall of Community Development in Developing Countries, 1950-65: A Critical Analysis and an Annotated Bibliography 1978, MSU Rural Development Papers, East Lansing, Michigan Sate University
36. Jardine JT. The development of rural sociological research. Rural America 1935, 13(8):8-11. pp.
37. Jollivet M. Un temps fort de la sociologie rurale francaise. Etudes Rurales 2009, 183:67-82. pp.
38. Kaufman HF, Polson RA, Ramsey CE. The role and function of rural sociology. Sociologia Ruralis 1964, 4:371-389. pp.
39. Kipping M, Bjarnar O. The Americanisation of European Business: The Marshall Plan and the Transfer of US Management Models 1998, London, Routledge
40. Kirkendall RS. Social Scientists and Farm Politics in the Age of Roosevelt 1966, Columbia, University of Missouri Press
41. Kötter H. The situation of rural sociology in Europe. Sociologia Ruralis 1967, 7:254-294. pp.
42. Larson OF. The role of rural sociology in a changing society. Rural Sociology 1959, 24:1-10. pp.
43. Larson OF. Contributions of rural sociology research and evaluation to extension development in the United States. Sociologia Ruralis 1965, 5:308-332. pp.
44. Larson OF, Zimmerman JN. Sociology in Government 2003, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania State University Press
45. Law J. After Method 2004, London, Routledge
46. Law J, Urry J. Enacting the social. Economy and Society 2004, 33:390-410. pp.
47. Levine FJ, Zuiches JJ. Foreword. Sociology in Government 2003, vii-ix. Larson OF, Zimmerman JN. Pp, in, eds., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania State University Press
48. Lively CE. Rural sociology as applied science. Rural Sociology 1943, 8:331-342. pp.
49. Locke RR. Management and Higher Education since 1940: The Influence of America and Japan on West Germany, Great Britain and France 1989, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
50. Lowe P. The agency of rural research in comparative context. Rural Transformations and Rural Policies in the UK and US Shucksmith MBrown DShortall SWarner MVergunst J. forthcoming, In, eds., London, Routledge
51. Lowe P, Bodiguel M. Rural Studies in Britain and France 1990, eds, London, Belhaven
52. Lowe P, Ward N. British rural geography: a disciplinary enterprise in changing times. Contemporary Rural Geographies - Land Property and Resources in Britain: Essays in Honour of Richard Munton 2007, 1-20. Clout H, Pp, in, ed., London, Routledge
53. Lupri E. Industrialisierung und Strukurwandlungen in der Familie: Ein inter-kultureller Vergleich. Sociologia Ruralis 1965, 5:57-76. pp.
54. Lupri E. Theoretical and methodological problems in cross-national research. Sociologia Ruralis 1969, 9:99-113. pp.
55. Marselli GA. American sociologists and Italian peasant society: with reference to the book of Banfield. Sociologia Ruralis 1963, 3:319-338. pp.
56. Mendras H. Les études de sociologie rurale en Europe. Sociologia Ruralis 1960, 1:15-34. pp.
57. Munters QJ. Sociologia Ruralis on the balance. Sociologia Ruralis 1972, 12:86-103. pp.
58. Nelson L. Land Reform in Italy 1956, NPA Planning Leaflet no. 97, Washington, D.C., National Planning Association
59. Nelson L. Rural Sociology: Its Origins and Growth in the United States 1969, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press
60. Agricultural Advisory Services in European Countries 1950, OEEC, Paris, Organisation for European Economic Cooperation
61. Development of the Agricultural Advisory Services in Europe since 1950 1954, OEEC, Paris, Organisation for European Economic Cooperation
62. Osborne T, Rose N. Do the social sciences create phenomena? The example of public opinion research. British Journal of Sociology 1999, 50:367-396. pp.
63. Phillips ST. This Land, This Nation: Conservation, Rural America, and the New Deal 2007, Columbia, Columbia University Press
64. Raper A. Rural sociologists and foreign assignments. Rural Sociology 1953, 18:264-266. pp.
65. Robinson DI. The Measure of Democracy and Public Life, 1930-1945 1999, Toronto, Toronto University Press
66. Rogers EM. Free Press of Glencoe). Diffusion of Innovations 1962, New York
67. Rogers EM, van den Ban AW. Research on the diffusion of agricultural innovations in the United States and The Netherlands. Sociologia Ruralis 1963, 13:38-49. pp.
68. Runge CF. Agricultural Economics: A Brief Intellectual History 2006, Centre for International Food and Agricultural Policy Working Paper WP06-1, St Paul, University of Minnesota Press
69. Sociological Research on the Diffusion and Adoption of New Farm Practices: A Review of Previous Research and a Statement of Hypotheses and Needed Research 1952, Rural Sociological Society, Report of the Subcommittee on The Diffusion and Adoption of Farm Practices, Kentucky, Kentucky Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Kentucky
70. Sanderson D. The teaching of rural sociology: particularly in the Land-Grant Colleges and Universities. American Journal of Sociology 1917, 22(4):433-460. pp.
71. Sanderson D. Status of and prospects for research in rural life under the New Deal. American Journal of Sociology 1935, 41:180-193. pp.
72. Schaffner B. Fatherland: A Study of Authoritarianism in the German Family 1948, New York, Columbia University Press
73. The Marshall Plan: Fifty Years After 2001, Schain M. ed., New York, Palgrave
74. Smith TL. Rural sociology in the United States and Canada: A trend report. Current Sociology 1957, 6:5-18. pp.
75. Stockdale JD. Technology and change in United States agriculture: model or warning? Sociologia Ruralis 1977, 17:43-58. pp.
76. Taylor CC. Social theory and social action. Rural Sociology 1940, 5:17-31. pp.
77. Taylor CC. Social science and social action in agriculture. Social Forces 1941, 20:154-9. pp.
78. Taylor CC. The development of rural sociology abroad. Rural Sociology 1965, 30:462-473. pp.
79. The Contribution of Extension Methods and Techniques Toward the Rehabilitation of War-Torn Countries 1945, USDA, Extension Service and Office of Foreign Agricultural Relations, Report on Conference. Washington DC, September 19-22, 1944, Washington, DC, United States Department of Agriculture
80. Extension Experiences Around the World 1951, USDA, Extension Service and Office of Foreign Agricultural Relations, Report on Conference, Washington D.C., May 16-20, 1949, Washington, DC, United States Department of Agriculture
81. van den Ban AW. Locality group differences in the adoption of new farm practices. Rural Sociology 1960, 25:308-320. pp.
82. Wilkening EA. A sociopsychological approach to the study of the acceptance of innovations in farming. Rural Sociology 1950, 15:352-364. pp.
83. Wilson MC, Gallup G. Extension teaching methods and other factors that influence adoption of agricultural and home economics practices 1955, Circular 495, Washington DC, USDA Federal Extension Service