Site characterization model using artificial neural network and kriging

International Journal of Geomechanics

Volumn 10, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 171-180

  Samui, Pijush ^a   Sitharam, T G ^b  

^a VIT UNIVERSITY   (India)

^b INDIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (India)

Author keywords

ANN; In situ testing; Kriging; Models; Neural networks; Site characterization; Site evaluation; SPT; Subsurface investigations

Indexed keywords

BACKPROPAGATION ALGORITHMS; BOREHOLES; FORECASTING; GEOMETRY; INTERPOLATION; MODELS; NEURAL NETWORKS;

IN-SITU TESTING; KRIGING; SITE CHARACTERIZATION; SITE EVALUATION; SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATIONS;

MULTILAYER NEURAL NETWORKS;

ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; GEOSTATISTICS; IN SITU TEST; KRIGING; NUMERICAL MODEL; PENETRATION TEST; SITE CHARACTERIZATION; VARIOGRAM;

BANGALORE; INDIA; KARNATAKA;

EID: 77956834903     PISSN: 15323641     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2010)10:5(171)     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Asaoka A. Grivas D.A. Spatial variability of the undrained strength of clays. J. Geotech. Eng. 1982, 108(5):743-745. 0733-9410.
2. Baecher G.B. On estimating auto-covariance of soil properties. Proc., Specialty Conf. on Probabilistic Mechanics and Structural Reliability 1984, 110:214-218., ASCE, New York
3. Baecher G.B. Geotechnical error analysis. 1986, 23-31. . Transportation Research Record. 1105, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
4. Bavarian B. Introduction to neural networks for intelligence control. IEEE Control Syst. Mag. 1998, 1:3-7. ISMAD7, 0272-1708, .,
5. Burgess T.M. Webster R. Optimal interpolation and isarithmic mapping of soil properties I. The semivariogram and punctual kriging. J. Soil Sci. 1980a, 31:315-331. JSSCAH, 0022-4588, 10.1111/j.1365-2389.1980.tb02084.x.
6. Burgess T.M. Webster R. Optimal interpolation and isarithmic mapping of soil properties II, block kriging. J. Soil Sci. 1980b, 31:333-341. JSSCAH, 0022-4588, 10.1111/j.1365-2389.1980.tb02085.x.
7. Chiasson P. Lafleur J. Soulie M. Law K.T. Characterizing spatial variability of clay by geostatistics. Can. Geotech. J. 1995, 32:1-10. CGJOAH, 0008-3674, 10.1139/t95-001.
8. Clark I. Practical geostatistics 1979, 129, London Applied Science Publishers, London
9. Degroot D.J. Analyzing spatial variability of in situ soil properties. Proc., ASCE Proc. of Uncertainty '96, Uncertainty in the Geologic Environment: From Theory to Practice 1996, 210-238, ASCE, Reston, Va.
10. Delhomme J.P. Spatial variability and uncertainty in ground water flow parameters: A geostatistical approach. Water Resour. Res. 1979, 15(2):269-280. WRERAQ, 0043-1397, 10.1029/WR015i002p00269.
11. Demuth H.B. Beale M. Neural network toolbox, user's guide 1999, The Mathworks, Inc., Natick, Mass.
12. De Rubeis V. Tosi P. Gasparini C. Solipaca A. Application of kriging technique to seismic intensity data. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 2005, 95(2):540-548. BSSAAP, 0037-1106, 10.1785/0120030250.
13. Dirnberger M.M. Stephenson R.W. Geostatistically-based method to assess potential hazardous waste sites using hard and soft data. Proc., Uncertainty '96, Uncertainty in the Geologic Environment: From Theory to Practice 1996, 58:826-847. and ., ASCE, Reston, Va., Vol.
14. Fenton G.A. Random field characterization NGES data. Proc., Probabilistic Site Characterization 1998NGES, Seattle.
15. Finn L. Ventura C. Challenging issues in local microzonation. Proc., 5th Int. Conf. on Seismic Zonation 1995, 1554-1561. and .
16. Hagan M.T. Menhaj M.B. Training feedforward networks with the Marquardt algorithm. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 1994, 5. ITNNEP, 1045-9227.
17. Hebb D.O. The organization of behavior 1949, ., Wiley, New York.
18. Hegazy Y.A. Mayne P.W. Rouhani S. Geostatistical assessment of spatial variability in piezocone tests. Uncertainty in the geologic environment: From theory to practice (GSP 58) 1996, 254-268. and ., ASCE, New York
19. Journel A.G. Huijbregts C.J. Mining geostatistics 1978, and ., Academic, New York.
20. Juang C.H. Jiang T. Christopher R.A. Three-dimensional site characterisation: Neural network approach. Geotechnique 2001, 51(9):799-809. GTNQA8, 0016-8505.
21. Kitanidis P.K. Orthonormal residuals in geostatistics: Model criticism and parameter estimation. Math. Geol. 1991, 23(5):741-758. MATGED, 0882-8121, 10.1007/BF02082534.
22. Kitanidis P.K. Introduction to geostatistics: Applications in hydrogeology 1997, 86-95. 10.1017/CBO9780511626166, ., Cambridge University Press
23. Kulatilake P.H. S. W. Probabilistic potentiometric surface mapping. J. Geotech. Eng. 1989, 115(11):1569-1587. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1989)115:11(1569), 0733-9410.
24. Kulatilake P.H. S. W. Ghosh A. An investigation into accuracy of sparial variation estimation using static cone penetrometer data. Proc., 1st Int. Symp. on Penetration Testing 1988, 815-821. and .
25. Kulatilake P.H. S. W. Miller K.M. A scheme for estimating the spatial variation of soil properties in three dimensions. Proc., 5th Int. Conf. on Application of Statistics and Probabilities in Soil and Struct. Engrg. 1987, 669-677. and .
26. Lumb P. Spatial variability of soil properties. Proc., 2nd Int. Conf. on Application of Statistics and Probability in Soil and Struct. Engrg. 1975, 397-421.
27. Matheron G. The theory of regionalized variables and its application 1971, ., Ecole Des Mines, Fontainebleau, France.
28. Matheron G. Théorie des variables régionalisées in Traité d'Informatique. Géologique 1972, 306-378. ., Masson
29. Matlab user's manual. Version 5.3 1999, MathWorks, Inc., The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, Mass.
30. McCulloch W.S. Pitts W. A logical calculus in the ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bull. Math. Biophys. 1943, 5:115-133. BMBIAO, 0007-4985, 10.1007/BF02478259.
31. More J.J. The Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm: Implementation and theory. Numerical analysis 1977, 105-116. G. A. Watson, ed., Springer, Heidelberg, Germany
32. Najjar Y.M. Basheer I.A. Neural network approach for site characterization and uncertainty prediction. Geotech. Spec. Publ. 1996a, 58(1):134-148. GSPUER, 0895-0563.
33. Najjar Y.M. Basheer I.A. Utilizing computational neural networks for evaluating the permeability of compacted clay liners. Geotech. Geologic. Eng. 1996b, 14:193-221. GGENE3, 0960-3182.
34. O'Neill M.W. Yoon L.M. Spatial variability of CPT parameters at University of Houston NGES. Probabilistic site characterization at the national geotechnical experimental sites. Geotech. Spec. Publ. 2004, 121:1-12. GSPUER, 0895-0563.
35. Phoon K.K. Kulhawy F.H. On quantifying inherent soil variability. Proc., Uncertainty '96, Uncertainty in the Geologic Environment: From Theory to Practice 1996, 326-340. ASCE, Reston, Va.
36. Phoon K.K. Kulhawy F.H. Characterization of geotechnical variability. Can. Geotech. J. 1999, 36(4):612-624. CGJOAH, 0008-3674, 10.1139/cgj-36-4-612.
37. Radhakrishna B.P. Vaidyanadhan R. Geology of Karnataka 1997, and , Geological Society of India, Bangalore, India.
38. Rendu J.M. An introduction to geostatistical methods of mineral evaluation. S. African Inst. of Min. and Metal. 1978, 84. .
39. Riggs C.O. American standard penetration test practice. Proc., 14th PSC 1986, 124:949-967. . Vol.,, ASCE, New York
40. Robertson P.K. Wride C.E. Cyclic liquefaction and its evaluation based on the SPT and CPT. Proc., 1998 NCEER Workshop on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils 1998.
41. Rosenblatt F. The perceptron: A probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain. Psychol. Rev. 1958, 65:386-408. PSRVAX, 0033-295X, 10.1037/h0042519
42. Schmertmann J.H. Statics of SPT. JGED 1979, 105(5):665-670.
43. Seed H.B. Idriss I.M. Influence of SPT procedures in soil liquefaction resistance evaluation. JGED 1985, 111(12):1425-1445. and .
44. Shahin M.A. Jaksa M.B. Maier H.R. Predicting the settlement of shallow foundations on cohesion less soils using back-propagation neural networks 2000, R167, Dept. of Civil and Envi. Eng., Univ. of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
45. Sincero A.P. Predicting mixing power using artificial neural network 2003, ., EWRI World Water and Environmental.
46. Skempton A.W. Standard penetration test procedures. Geotechnique 1986, 36(3):425-447. GTNQA8, 0016-8505, 10.1680/geot.1986.36.3.425.
47. Soulié M. Geostatistical applications in goetechnics. Geostatistics for natural resources characterization. Part2, NATO ASI series 1983, 703-730, Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland
48. Soulié M. Montes P. Sivestri V. Modelling spatial variability of soil parameters. Can. Geotech. J. 1990, 27:617-630. CGJOAH, 0008-3674, 10.1139/t90-076.
49. Tang W.H. Probabilistic evaluation of penetration resistance. J. Geotech. Eng. 1979, 105(10):1173-1191. 0733-9410.
50. Toll D. Artificial intelligence applications in geotechnical engineering. Electronics Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 1996, 1. .
51. Uzielli M. Vannucchi G. Phonn K.K. Random filed characterization of strees-normalised cone penetration testing parameters. Geotechnique 2005, 55(1):3-20. GTNQA8, 0016-8505.
52. Vanmarcke E.H. Probabilistic modeling of soil profiles. J. Geotech. Eng. 1977, 102(11):1247-1265. 0733-9410.
53. Vanmarcke E.H. Random fields: Analysis and synthesis 1983, ., MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
54. Wingle W.L. Poeter E.P. Evaluating subsurface uncertainty using zonal kring. Proc., Uncertainty '96, Uncertainty in the Geologic Environment: From Theory to Practice 1996, 1318-1330., ASCE, Reston, Va.
55. Wu T.H. Wong K. Probabilistic soil exploration: A case history. J. Geotech. Engrg. Div. 1981, 107(12):1693-1711. 0733-9410.
56. Yaglom A.M. Theory of stationary random functions 1962, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.