Critical appraisal of quality of clinical practice guidelines for treatment of psoriasis vulgaris, 2006-2009

Journal of Investigative Dermatology

Volumn 130, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 2389-2395

  Tan, Jerry K L ^a   Wolfe, Barat J ^b   Bulatovic, Ranko ^c   Jones, Emily B ^c   Lo, Andrea Y ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WINDSOR   (Canada)

^c WESTERN UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSORIASIS VULGARIS; QUALITY CONTROL; SCORING SYSTEM; STANDARD; DERMATOLOGY; EVIDENCE BASED NURSING; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; PSORIASIS; STANDARDS;

DERMATOLOGY; EVIDENCE-BASED NURSING; HUMANS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; PSORIASIS; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE;

EID: 77956833420     PISSN: 0022202X     EISSN: 15231747     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/jid.2010.164     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. AGREE Collaboration (2001) Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation (AGREE) Instrument. Available at www.agreecollaboration. org/instrument, accessed 20 August 2009
2. AGREE Collaboration (2003) AGREE instrument training manual. Available at www.agreecollaboration.org/pdf/aitraining.pdf, accessed 15 March 2010
3. American Academy of Dermatology (1997/revised 2009) Administrative regulations evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Available at http://www.aad.org/Forms/Policies/Uploads/AR/AR%20Evidence- Based%20Clinical%20Practice%20Guidelines.pdf, accessed 15 March 2010
4. Bell H, Ormerod AD (2009) Editorial: Writing a British Association of Dermatologists clinical guideline: an update on the process and guidance for authors. Br J Dermatol 160:725-728
5. Burgers JS, Bailey JV, Klazinga NS, et al., for the AGREE Collaboration (2002) Inside guidelines: comparative analysis of recommendations and evidence in diabetes guidelines from 13 countries. Diabetes Care 25:1933-1939
6. Cabana M, Rand C, Powe N et al. (1999) Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. J Am Med Assoc 282:1458-1465
7. Canadian Diabetes Association Clinical Practice Guidelines Expert Committee (2008) Canadian Diabetes Association 2008 clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and management of diabetes in Canada. Can J Diabetes 32(suppl 1):S1-201
8. Canadian Psoriasis Guidelines Committee (2009) Canadian Guidelines for the Management of Plaque Psoriasis. http://www.dermatology.ca/Psoriasis guidelines
9. Cluzeau F, Littlejohns P, Grimshaw J et al. (1999) Development and application of a generic methodology to assess the quality of clinical guidelines. Int J Qual Health Care 11:21-28
10. Davis D, Goldman J, Palda VA (2007) Handbook on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Canadian Medical Association: Ottawa
11. ON Elwyn G, O'Connor A, Stacey D et al. (2006) Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process. Br Med J 33:417-422
12. Field MJ, Lohr KN (1990) Clinical Practice Guidelines: Directions for a New Program. National Academy Press: Washington, DC.
13. Gottlieb A, Korman NJ, Gordon KB et al. (2008) Guidelines of care for the management of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: Section 2. Psoriatic arthritis: overview and guidelines of care for treatment with an emphasis on the biologics. J Am Acad Dermatol 58:851-864 (Pubitemid 351509657)
14. Grol R, Dalhuijzen J, Mkkink H et al. (1998) Attributes of clinical guidelines that influence use of guidelines in general practice: observational study. Br Med J 317:858-861
15. Hasenfeld R, Shekelle PG (2003) Is the methodological quality of guidelines declining in the US? Comparison of the quality of US Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR) guidelines with those published subsequently. Qual Saf Health Care 12:428-434
16. Krahn M, Naglie G (2008) The next step in guideline development: incorporating patient preferences. J Am Med Assoc 300:436-438
17. Lohr KN (1998) The quality of practice guidelines and the quality of health care. In: Guidelines in Health Care. Report of a WHO Conference. January 1997 (Selbmann HK) Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft
18. Lohr KN, Field MJ (1992) A provisional instrument for assessing clinical practice guidelines. In: Guidelines for Clinical Practice. From Development to Use. (Field MJ, Lohr KN, eds), Washington, DC: National Academy Press
19. Menter A, Gottlieb A, Feldman SR et al. (2008) Guidelines of care for the management of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: Section 1. Overview of psoriasis and guidelines of care for the treatment of psoriasis with biologics. J Am Acad Dermatol 58:826-850 (Pubitemid 351509656)
20. Menter A, Korman NJ, Elmets CA et al. (2009a) Guidelines of care for the management of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: Section 3. Guidelines of care for the management and treatment of psoriasis with topical therapies. J Am Acad Dermatol 60:643-659
21. Menter A, Korman NJ, Elmets CA et al. (2009b) Guidelines of care for the management of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: Section 4. Guidelines of care for the management and treatment of psoriasis with traditional systemic agents. J Am Acad Dermatol 61:451-485
22. Nast A, Kopp IB, Augustin M et al. (2007) Evidence-based (S3) guidelines for the treatment of psoriasis vulgaris. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 5:1-119
23. Nast A, Spuls PH, Ormerod AD et al. (2009) A critical appraisal of evidence-based guidelines for the treatment of psoriasis vulgaris: 'AGREE-ing' on a common based for European evidence-based psoriasis treatment guidelines. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 23:782-787
24. Pathirana D, Ormerod AD, Saiag P et al. (2009) European S3-Guidelines on the systemic treatment of psoriasis vulgaris. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 23:1-69
25. Protheroe J, Fahey T, Montgomery AA et al. (2000) The impact of patients' preferences on the treatment of atrial fibrillation: observational study of patient-based decision analysis. Br Med J 320:1380-1384
26. 1c targets. A guidance statement from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 147:417-422
27. Smith C, Anstey AV, Barker JNWN et al. (2005) British Association of Dermatologists guidelines for use of biological interventions in psoriasis 2005. Br J Dermatol 153:486-497
28. Smith CH, Anstey AV, Barker JNWN et al. (2009) British Association of Dermatologists' guidelines for biologic interventions for psoriasis 2009. Br J Dermatol 161:987-1019
29. Vlayen J, Aertgeerts B, Hannes K et al. (2005) A systematic review of appraisal tools for clinical practice guidelines: multiple similarities and one common deficit. Int J Qual Health Care 17:235-242
30. Woolf SH, Grol R, Hutchinson A et al. (1999) Clinical guidelines: potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical guidelines. Br Med J 318:527-530