Clausewitz on forestry

New Zealand Journal of Forestry

Volumn 51, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 34-37

  Walker, John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956759938     PISSN: 11747986     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Note

References (11)

1. Cave, I.D. 1968. The anisotropic elasticity of plant cell walls. Wood Science and Technology 2(4) 268-78.
2. Gaunt, D. 1998. If you are not winning, change the rules. New Zealand Forest Research, Wood Processing Newsletter 23, Sawmilling 3-5.
3. Heard, M. 2006. Branching out. The Listener 206 (3474) 34-5.
4. Macdonald, E. and Hubert, J. 2002. A review of the effects of silviculture on timber quality of Sitka spruce. Forestry 75(2) 107-38.
5. Meylan, B.A. and Probine, M.C. 1969. Microfibril angle as a parameter in wood quality assessment. Forest Products Journal 19(4) 30-4.
6. NZFOA. 2006. New Zealand forest industry facts and figures 2005/2006. New Zealand Forest Owners Association, Wellington.
7. Shengzuo Fang, Wenzhong Yang and Ye Tian. 2006. Clonal and within-tree variation in microfibril angle in poplar clones. New Forests 31 373-83.
8. Snowdon, K, McIvor and Nicholas, I. 2006. Energy farming around Taupo. New Zealand Tree Grower 27 (4) 25-6.
9. Sorensson, C. T., Nepveu, G. and Kimberley, M. O. 2004. Intra- and inter-tree modelling of wood stiffness of clears of age-10 radiata pine clones, and simulated response of stiffness to increased genetic selection intensity. In (G. Nevpeu, edit.) Connection between silviculture and wood quality through modelling. Proceedings, IUFRO Conference Harrison Hot Springs, British Colombia, 10-12 Sept 2002, p 104-17.
10. The Economist. 2006. Shots across the Stern. The Economist 381 (8508) 82.
11. US Department of Energy. 2006. Breaking the biological barriers to cellulosic ethanol: a research roadmap resulting from the biomass to biofuels workshop. Department of Energy, DOE/SC-0095.