Applying genetic algorithms and neural networks to chemometric problems

Data Handling in Science and Technology

Volumn 23, Issue C, 2003, Pages 343-375

  Luke, Brian T ^a  

^a SAIC FREDERICK INC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956733341     PISSN: 09223487     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S0922-3487(03)23012-4     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. Agrafiotis D.K., Cedeno W., and Lobanov V.S. On the use of neural network ensembles in QSAR and QSPR. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 42 (2002) 903-911
2. Aires-de-Sousa J. JATOON: Java tools for neural networks. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 61 (2002) 167-173
3. Breneman C.M., and Rehm M. QSPR analysis of HPLC column capacity factors for a set of high-energy materials using electronic van der Waals surface property descriptors computed by transferable atom equivalent method. J. Comput. Chem. 18 (1997) 182-197
4. Brown E.C., and Sumichrast R.T. Impact of the replacement heuristic in a grouping genetic algorithm. Computers Oper. Res. 30 (2003) 1575-1593
5. Cronin M.T.D., Aptula A.O., Dearden J.C., Duffy J.C., Netzeva T.I., Patel H., Rowe P.H., Schultz T.W., Worth A.P., Voutzoulidis K., and Schuurmann G. Structure-based classification of antibacterial activity. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 42 (2002) 869-878
6. Geman S., and Geman D. Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions and Bayesian restoration of images. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 6 (1984) 721-741
7. Goldberg D.E. Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning (1989), Addison-Wesley, Berkeley, CA
8. Hasancebi O., and Erbatur F. Evaluation of crossover techniques in genetic algorithm based optimum structural design. Computers Struct. 78 (2000) 435-448
9. Hollstein, R.B., 1971. Artificial genetic adaptation in computer control systems. Doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Dissertation Abstracts International, 32, 1510B (University Microfilms No. 71-23,773).
10. Izrailev S., and Agrafiotis D. A novel method for building regression tree models for QSAR based on artificial ant colony systems. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 41 (2001) 176-180
11. Izrailev S., and Agrafiotis D. Variable selection for QSAR by artificial ant colony systems. SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 3-4 (2002) 417-423
12. Livingstone D.J. The characterization of chemical structures using molecular properties. A Survey. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 40 (2000) 195-209
13. Lucic B., and Trinajstic N. Multivariate regression outperforms several robust architectures of neural networks in QSAR modeling. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 39 (1999) 121-132
14. Luke B.T. Comparison of three different QSAR/QSPR generation techniques. J. Mol. Struct. (Theochem) 468 (1999) 13-20
15. Luke B.T. Comparison of different data set screening methods for use in QSAR/QSPR generation studies. J. Mol. Struct. (Theochem) 507 (2000) 229-238
16. Luke B.T. Fuzzy structure-activity relationships. SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 14 (2003) 41-57
17. Parker D.B. Learning Logic, Invention Report, S81-64, File 1 (1982), Office of Technology Licensing, Stanford University
18. Rogers D., and Hopfinger A.J. Application of genetic function approximation to quantitative structure-activity relationships and quantitative structure-property relationships. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 34 (1994) 854-866
19. Rumelhart D.E., Hilton G.E., and Williams R.J. Learning internal representations by error propagation. parallel distributed processing vol. 1 (1986), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA pp. 318-362
20. Sejnowski T.J., and Rosenberg C.R. Parallel networks that learn to pronounce English text. Complex Syst. 1 (1987) 145-168
21. Shen M., LeTiran A., Xiao Y., Golbraikh A., Kohn H., and Tropsha A. Quantitative structure-activity relationship analysis of functionalized amino acid anticonvulsant agents using k nearest neighbor and simulated annealing PLS methods. J. Med. Chem. 45 (2002) 2811-2823
22. So S., and Karplus M. Evolutionary optimization in quantitative structure-activity relationship: an application of genetic neural networks. J. Med. Chem. 39 (1996) 1521-1530
23. Szu H., and Hartley R. Fast simulated annealing. Phys. Lett. 1222 (1987) 157-162
24. Tounge B.A., Pfahler L.B., and Reynolds C.H. Chemical information based scaling of molecular descriptors: a universal chemical scale for library design. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 42 (2002) 879-884
25. Tropsha A., and Zheng W. Identification of the descriptor pharmacophores using variable selection QSAR: application to database mining. Curr. Pharm. Des. 7 (2001) 599-612
26. Wasserman P.D. Combined Backpropagation/Cauchy Machine. Neural Networks: Abstracts of the First INNS Meeting, Boston vol. 1 (1988), Pergamon Press, Elmsford, NY p. 556
27. Wasserman P.D. Neural Computing: Theory and practice (1989), Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York
28. Werbos, P.J., (1974). Beyond regression: new tools for prediction and analysis in the behavioral sciences, Masters Thesis, Harvard University.
29. Whitley D. The GENITOR algorithm and selection pressure: why rank-based allocation of reproductive trials is best. In: Schaffer J.D. (Ed). Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Genetic Algorithms (1989), Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos, CA 116-121
30. Wolberg W.H., Street W.N., and Mangasarian O.L. Machine learning techniques to diagnose breast cancer from fine-needle aspirates. Cancer Lett. 77 (1994) 163-171
31. Wolpert D.H., and Macready W.G. No Free Lunch Theorems for Search. Technical Report TR-92-02-010 (1995), The Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM, USA