Isolation and expression analysis of salt induced genes from contrasting grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) cultivars

Plant Science

Volumn 179, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 489-498

  Daldoul, Samia ^a,b   Guillaumie, Sabine ^c   Reustle, Götz M ^b   Krczal, Gabi ^b   Ghorbel, Abdelwahed ^a   Delrot, Serge ^c   Mliki, Ahmed ^a   Höfer, Michael U ^b  

^a CENTRE DE BIOTECHNOLOGIE DE BORJ CÉDRIA   (Tunisia)

^b AlPlanta Institute for Plant Research   (Germany)

^c Bordeaux Sciences Agro   (France)

Author keywords

Grapevine; Salt stress; Subtractive cDNA libraries

Indexed keywords

VITACEAE; VITIS; VITIS VINIFERA;

EID: 77956719069     PISSN: 01689452     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2010.07.017     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Cheong M.S., Yun D.J. Salt stress signalling. J. Plant Biol. 2007, 50:148-155.
2. Hachicha M., Mtimet A. Les sols salés et la salinisation en Tunisie. Sols de Tunisie 1994, 15:271-341.
3. Munns R. Genes and salt tolerance: bringing them together. New Phytol. 2005, 167:645-663.
4. Chinnusamy V., André J., Jian-Kang Z. Understanding and improving salt tolerance in plants. Crop Sci. 2005, 45:437-448.
5. Zhang J.Z., Creelman R.A., Zhu J.-K. From laboratory to field. Using information from Arabidopsis to engineer salt, cold, and drought tolerance in crops. Plant Physiol. 2004, 135:615-621.
6. + transport in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2009, 21:2163-2178.
7. Munns R., James R.A., Lauchli A. Approaches to increasing the salt tolerance of wheat and other cereals. J. Exp. Bot. 2006, 57:1025-1043.
8. Downton W.J.S. Photosyntheses in salt stressed grapevines. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 1977, 4:183-192.
9. Downton W.J.S., Loweys B.R., Grant W.J.R. Salinity effects on the stomatal behavior of grapevine. New Phytol. 1990, 16:499-503.
10. Walker R.R., Blackmon D.H., Clingeleffer P.R., Correll R.L. Rootstock effects on salt tolerance of irrigated field-grown grapevines (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Sultana) 2. Ion concentration in leaves and juice. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 2004, 10:90-99.
11. Shani U., Ben-Gal A. Long-term response of grapevines to salinity: osmotic effects and ion toxicity. Am. J. Enol. Viticult. 2005, 56:148-154.
12. Ben Salem A., Hanana M., Fathalli N., Souid I., Zemni H., Bessis R., Ghorbel A. Caractères anatomiques adaptatifs de la feuille de vigne dans le sud tunisien. J. Int. Sci. Vigne Vin 2005, 39:11-18.
13. Jemâa R., Ben Salem-Fnayou A., Jallouli N., Zemni H., Ghorbel A. Etude de la transpiration de cinq variétés de vigne cultivées en Tunisie. Bull. de l'OIV 2004, 537-538:229-241.
14. Hamrouni L., Ben Abdallah F., Abdelly C., Ghorbel W. Evaluation de la tolérance au sel chez les vignes tunisiennes cultivées in vitro. Proceedings du XXVIIème Congrès Mondial de la Vigne et du Vin 2002, 102-112.
15. Yeo A.R., Yeo M.E., Flowers S.A., Flowers T.J. Screening of rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes for physiological characters contributing to salinity resistance and their relationship to overall performance. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1990, 79:377-384.
16. Jaillon O., et al. The grapevine genome sequence suggests ancestral hexaploidization in major angiosperm phyla. Nature 2007, 449:463-467.
17. Troggio M., Pezzulli S., Pindo M., Malacarne G., Fontana P., Moreira F.M., Costantini L., Grando M.S., Viola R., Velasco R. Beyond the genome, opportunities for a modern viticulture: a research overview. Am. J. Enol. Viticult. 2008, 59:117-127.
18. Cramer G.R., Ergül A., Grimplet J., Tillett R.L., Tattersall E.A.R., Bohlman M.C., Vincent D., Sonderegger J., Evans J., Osborne C., Quilici D., Schlauch K.A., Schooley D.A., Cushman J.C. Water and salinity stress in grapevines: early and late changes in transcript and metabolite profiles. Funct. Integr. Genomics 2006, 7:111-134.
19. Jellouli N., Ben Jouiraa H., Skouri H., Ghorbel A., Gourgouri A., Mliki A. Proteomic analysis of Tunisian grapevine cultivar Razegui under salt stress. J. Plant Physiol. 2007, 165:471-481.
20. Kozian D.H., Kirschbaum B.J. Comparative gene expression analysis. Trends Biotechnol. 1999, 17:73-78.
21. Diatchenko L., Lau Y.F.C., Campbell A.P., Chenchik A., Moqadam F., Huang B., Lukyanov S., Lukyanov K., Gurskaya N., Sverdlov E.D., Siebert P.D. Suppression subtractive hybridization: a method for generating differentially regulated or tissue-specific cDNA probes and libraries. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1996, 93:6025-6030.
22. Schena M., Shalon D., Davis R.W., Brown P.O. Quantitative monitoring of gene expression patterns with a complementary DNA microarray. Science 1995, 270:467-470.
23. Berger D.K., Crampton B.G., Hein I. Wiesner Vos screening of cDNA libraries on glass slide microarrays, methods in molecular biology. Microarrays: Applications and Data Analysis 2007, vol. 382:177-203. Beckman Coulter, Inc., Brea, CA. second ed.
24. E.J. Hewitt, Sand and water culture methods used in the study of plant nutrition, CAB, Tech Commun, second ed., Farnhan Royal, England, 22 (1996), pp. 431-432.
25. Tandon H.L.S. Methods of Analysis of Soils, Plants, Water and Fertilizers 1998, Fertilizer Development and Consultation Organisation, New Delhi, pp. 49-82. first ed.
26. Bates L.S., Waldren R.P., Teare I.D. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant Soil 1973, 39:205-207.
27. Daldoul S., Chenenanoui S., Mliki A., Höfer M. Improvement of an RNA purification method for grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) suitable for cDNA library construction. Acta Physiol. Plant 2009, 31:871-875.
28. Wassenegger M., Heimes S., Saenger H.L. An infectious viroid RNA replicon evolved from an in vitro-generated non-infectious viroid deletion mutant via a complementary deletion in vivo. EMBO J. 1994, 13:6172-6177.
29. Shi C., Koch G., Ouzunova M., Wenzel G., Zein I., Lübberstedt T. Comparison of maize brown-midrib isogenic lines by cellular UV-microspectrophotometry and comparative transcript profiling. Plant Mol. Biol. 2006, 62:697-714.
30. Smyth G.K. Linear models and empirical Bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Stat. Appl. Genet. Mol. Biol. 2004, (No. 1 Article 3).
31. Benjamini Y., Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. Royal Stat. Soc. Series B 1995, 57:289-300.
32. Church G.M., Gilbert W. Genomic sequencing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1984, 81:1991-1995.
33. Altschul S.F., Gish W., Miller W., Myers E.W., Lipman D.J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 1990, 215:403-410.
34. Delauney A.J., Verma D.P.S. Proline biosynthesis and osmoregulation in plants. Plant J. 1993, 4:215-223.
35. Nanjo T., Kobayashi M., Yoshiba Y., Kakubari Y., Yamaguchi- Shinozaki K., Shinozaki K. Antisense suppression of proline degradation improves tolerance to freezing and salinity in Arabidopsis thaliana. FEBS Lett. 1999, 461:205-210.
36. 1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase and the accumulation of proline in Arabidopsis thaliana under osmotic stress. Plant J. 1995, 7:751-760.
37. Jain S., Nainawatee H.S., Jain R.K., Chowdhury J.B. Proline status of genetically stable salt-tolerant Brassica juncea L. somaclones and their parent cv. Prakash. Plant Cell Rep. 1991, 12:684-687.
38. Koca H., Bor M., Özdemir F., Türkan İ. The effect of salt stress on lipid peroxidation, antioxidative enzymes and proline content of sesame cultivars. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2007, 60:344-351.
39. Skopelitis D.S., Paranychianakis N.V., Paschalidis K.A., Pliakonis E.D., Delis I.D., Yakoumakis D.I., Antonios K., Papadakis A.K., Stephanou E.G., Roubelakis-Angelakis K.A. Abiotic stress generates ROS that signal expression of anionic glutamate dehydrogenases to form glutamate for proline synthesis in tobacco and grapevine. Plant Cell 2006, 18:2767-2781.
40. Hanana M., Deluc L., Fouquet R., Daldoul S., Léon C., Barrieu F., Ghorbel A., Mliki A., Hamdi S. Identification et caractérisation d'un gène de réponse à la déshydratation rd22 chez la vigne (Vitis vinifera L.). C. R. Biologies 2008, 331:569-578.
41. Xiao H., Nassuth A. Stress- and development-induced expression of spliced and unspliced transcripts from two highly similar dehydrin 1 genes in V. riparia and V. vinifera. Plant Cell Rep. 2006, 25:968-977.
42. Sivritepe N., Eris A. Determination of salt tolerance in some grapevine cultivars (Vitis vinifera L.) under in vitro conditions. Tr. J. Biol. 1999, 23:473-485.
43. Rhodes D., Nadloska-Orczyk A., Rich P.J. Salinity, osmolytes and compatible solutes. Salinity: Environment Plants Molecules 2002, 181-204. Kluwer, Boston. A. Lauchli, U. Luttge (Eds.).
44. Kliewer W.M., Nassar A.R. Changes in concentration of organic acids, sugars, and amino acids in grape leaves. Am. J. Enol. Viticult. 1966, 17:48-57.
45. Yoshiba Y., Kiyosue T., Nakashima K., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K., Shinozaki K. Regulation of levels of proline as an osmolyte in plants under water stress. Plant Cell Physiol. 1997, 38:1095-1102.
46. Brini F., Hanin M., Lumbreras V., Amara I., Khoudi H., Hassairi A., Pages M., Masmoudi K. Overexpression of wheat dehydrin DHN-5 enhances tolerance to salt and osmotic stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Rep. 2007, 26:2017-2026.
47. Zhu J.K. Salt and drought stress signal transduction in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2002, 53:247-273.
48. Kasuga M., Liu Q., Miura S., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. Improving plant drought, salt and freezing tolerance by gene transfer of a single stress-inducible transcription factor. Nat. Biotechnol. 1999, 17:287-291.
49. Kim J.C., Lee S.H., Cheong Y.H., Yoo C.-M., Lee S.I., Chun H.J., Yun D.-J., Hong J.C., Lee S.Y., Lim C.O., Cho M.J. A novel cold-inducible zinc-finger protein from soybean, SCOF-1, enhances cold tolerance in transgenic plants. Plant J. 2001, 25:247-259.
50. Wang J.-Y., Xia X.-L., Wang J.-P., Yin W.-L. Stress responsive zinc-finger protein gene of Populus euphratica in tobacco enhances salt tolerance. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2008, 50:56-61.
51. Wu L., Zhang Z., Zhang H., Wang X.-C., Huang R. Transcriptional modulation of ethylene response factor protein JERF3 in the oxidative stress response enhances tolerance of tobacco seedlings to salt, drought, and freezing. Plant Physiol. 2008, 148:1953-1963.
52. Abe H., Yamaguch-Shinozaki K., Urao T., Iwasaki T., Hosokawa D., Shinozaki K. Role of Arabidopsis MYC and MYB homologs in drought-and abscisic acid-regulated gene expression. Plant Cell 1997, 9:1859-1868.
53. Hara M., Tokunaga K., Kuboi T. Isolation of a drought-responsive alkaline a-galactosidase gene from New Zealand spinach. Plant Biotechnol. 2008, 25:497-501.
54. Reddy A.R., Ramakrishna W., Sekhar A.C., Ithal N., Babu P.R., Bonaldo M.F., Soares M.B., Bennetzen J.L. Novel genes are enriched in normalized cDNA libraries from drought-stressed seedlings of rice (Oryza sativa L. subsp. indica cv. Nagina 22). Genome 2002, 45:204-211.
55. Blomstedt C.K., Gianello R.D., Gaff D.F., Hamill J.D., Neale A.D. Differential gene expression in desiccation-tolerant and desiccation-sensitive tissue of the resurrection grass, Sporobolus stapfianus. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 1998, 25:937-946.
56. Grover A., Pareek A., Maheshwari S.C. Molecular approaches for genetically engineering plants tolerant to salt stress. Proc. Indian Natl. Sci. Acad. 1993, 59:113-127.
57. Cushman J.C., Bohnert H.J. Genomic approaches to plant stress tolerance. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2000, 3:117-124.
58. Grimplet J., Wheatley M.D., Jouira H.B., Deluc L.G., Cramer G.R., Cushman J.C. Proteomic and selected metabolite analysis of grape berry tissues under well-watered and water-deficit stress conditions. Proteomics 2009, 9:2503-2528.
59. Tattersall E.A., Grimplet J., Deluc L., Wheatley M.D., Vincent D., Osborne C., Ergül A., Lomen E., Blank R.R., Schlauch K.A., Cushman J.C., Cramer G.R. Transcript abundance profiles reveal larger and more complex responses of grapevine to chilling compared to osmotic and salinity stress. Funct. Integr. Genomics 2007, 4:317-333.
60. Ji W., Wright M.B., Cai L., Flament A., Lindpaintner K. Efficacy of SSH PCR in isolating differentially expressed genes. BMC Genomics 2002, 3(1):12.