Diffusion of Kyoto's clean development mechanism

Technological Forecasting and Social Change

Volumn 77, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 1391-1400

  Rahman, Shaikh M ^a   Dinar, Ariel ^b   Larson, Donald F ^c  

^a TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c WORLD BANK   (United States)

Author keywords

Clean development mechanism; Climate change; Investment projects; Kyoto protocol

Indexed keywords

ANNUAL FLOW; CDM PROJECTS; CERTIFIED EMISSION REDUCTIONS; CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM; DEVELOPED COUNTRIES; INVESTMENT PROJECTS; KYOTO PROTOCOL; MODEL PREDICTION; POTENTIAL MARKETS;

DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; EMISSION CONTROL; ENERGY POLICY; FORECASTING; INVESTMENTS;

CLIMATE CHANGE;

CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM; CLIMATE CHANGE; DEVELOPMENT PROJECT; INNOVATION; INVESTMENT; KYOTO PROTOCOL; MITIGATION;

EID: 77956683185     PISSN: 00401625     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2010.03.001     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Larson D.F., Breustedt G. Will markets direct investments under the Kyoto Protocol? Lessons from the activities implemented jointly pilots. Envir Resour Econ 2009, 43(3):433-456.
2. Larson D.F., Ambrosi P., Dinar A., Rahman S.M., Entler R. A review of carbon market policies and research. Int Rev Environ Resour Econ 2008, 2(3):177-236.
3. Lecocq F., Ambrosi P. The Clean Development Mechanism: history, status and prospects. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 2007, 1(1):134-151.
4. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) Risoe Center. CDM/JI Pipeline Analysis and Dataset, http://cdmpipeline.org, 2009.
5. Feder G., Umali D.L. The adoption of agricultural innovations: a review. Technol Forecast Soc Change 1993, 43:215-239.
6. Griliches Z. Hybrid corn: an exploration in the economics of technological change. Econometrica 1957, 25:501-522.
7. Griliches Z. Hybrid corn revisited: a reply. Econometrica 1980, 48:1451-1461.
8. Mansfield E. Technical change and the rate of imitation. Econometrica 1961, 29:741-765.
9. Gore A.P., Lavaraj U.A. Innovation diffusion in a heterogeneous population. Technol Forecast Soc Change 1987, 32:163-168.
10. Doessel D.P., Strong S.M. A neglected problem in the analysis of the diffusion process. Appl Econ 1991, 23:1335-1340.
11. Knudson M.K. Incorporating technological change in diffusion models. Am J Agric Econ 1991, 73:724-733.
12. Dinar A., Yaron D. Adoption and abandonment of irrigation technologies. Agric Econ 1992, 6:315-332.
13. Gregg J.V., Hassell C.H., Richardson J.T. Mathematical Trend Curves: An Aid to Forecasting 1964, Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.
14. Dixon R. Econometrica. Hybrid Corn Revisited 1980, 48:1451-1461.
15. Michalakelis C., Varoutas D., Sphicopoulos T. Diffusion models of mobile telephony in Greece. Telecommun policy 2008, 32(3-4):234-245.
16. Bewley R., Fiebig D.G. A flexible logistic growth model with application in telecommunications. Int J forecast 1988, 4:177-192.
17. Maddala G.S. Econometrics 1977, McGraw-Hill, New York.
18. Metcalfe J.S. Impulse and diffusion in the study of technical change. Futures 1981, 13:347-359.
19. Lekvall P., Wahlbin C. A study of some assumptions underlying innovation diffusion function. Swed J Econ 1973, 75:362-377.
20. Coleman K.S. Introduction to Mathematical Sociology 1964, Collier Macmillan, London.
21. Davies S. The Diffusion of Innovations 1979, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
22. Bass F.M. A new product growth model for consumer durables. Manag Sci 1969, 15:215-217.
23. Mahajan V., Schoeman M.E.F. Generalized model for the time pattern of the diffusion process. IEEE Transactions of Engineering Management 1977, 24:12-18.
24. IPCCC (2007) B. Metz, O.R. Davidson, P.R. Bosch, R. Dave, L.A. Meyer (eds). Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2007. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.
25. Williams C., Hanan N., Neff J., Scholes R., Berry J., Denning A., Baker D. Africa and the global carbon cycle. Carbon Balance and Management 2007, 2:1-13.
26. Schlamadinger B., Bosquet B., Streck C., Noble I., Dutschke M., Bird N. Can the EU emission trading scheme support CDM forestry?. Clim Policy 2005, 5:199-208.
27. Blanchard O., Criqui P., Kitous A. After The Hague, Bonn andMarrakech: The Future International Market for Emissions Permits and the Issue of Hot Air. Cahier de Recherche no. 27 bis, Institut d'Economie et de Politique de l'Energie, Grenoble 2002.
28. Eyckmans J., van Regemorter D., van Steenberghe V. Is Kyoto Fatally Flawed? Working Paper 2001-18, Center for Economic Studies 2001, Katholieke UniversiteitLeuven, Leuven, November.
29. Grütter J. The GHG market after Bonn. Grütter Consulting and Joint Implementation Quarterly 2001, 7(3):9.
30. E. Haites, Estimating the Market Potential for the Clean Development Mechanism: Review of Models and Lessons Learned. PCFplus Report 19, The World Bank Carbon Finance Business PCFplus Research Program, Washington, DC, 2004.
31. Halsnæs K. Market potential for Kyoto mechanisms: estimation of global market potential for co-operative greenhouse gas emission reduction policies. Energy Policy 2002, 30:3-32.
32. Holtsmark B. Russian behaviour in the market for permits under the Kyoto Protocol. Clim Policy 2003, 3(4):399-415.
33. Jotzo F., Michaelowa A. Estimating the CDM market under the Marrakech Accords. Clim Policy 2002, 2(1):179-196.
34. D. Van der Mensbrugghe, A preliminary analysis of the Kyoto Protocol: using the OECD GREEN model, Presented at the OECD Workshop on the Economic Modeling of Climate Change-18 September, Paris, 1998.
35. Vrolijk C. Quantifying the Kyoto commitments. Rev Eur Community Int Environ Law 2000, 9(3):285-295.
36. Zhang Z. Estimating the Size of the Potential Market for the Kyoto Flexibility Mechanisms. FEEM Working Paper No. 8.2000 1999, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, Milan.