Validation of mathematical models against experiments for radioactive waste repositories - DECOVALEX experience

Developments in Geotechnical Engineering

Volumn 79, Issue C, 1996, Pages 25-56

  Jing, L ^a   Tsang, C F ^b   Stephansson, O ^a   Kautsky, F ^c  

^a ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^b LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^c Swedish Radiation Protection Authority   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956681313     PISSN: 01651250     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S0165-1250(96)80021-6     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Jing L., Stephansson O., and Tsang C.-F. DECOVALEX - an international cooperative research project on mathematical models of coupled THM processes for safety analysis of radioactive waste repositor. Int. J. Rock. Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr. 32 5 (1995) 389-398
2. In: Tsang C.-F. (Ed). Coupled processes associated with nuclear waste repositories (1987), Academic Press Inc.
3. June. Jing L., Stephansson O., Rutqvist J., Tsang C.-F., and Kautsky F. DECOVALEX - mathematical models of coupled T-H-M processes for nuclear waste repositories. Phase I report, SKI Technical Report 93 (1993) 31
4. Jing L., Stephansson O., Rutqvist J., Tsang C.-F., and Kautsky F. DECOVALEX - mathematical models of coupled T-H-M processes for nuclear waste repositories. Phase II report, SKI Technical Report 94 16 (1994)
5. in press. Jing L., Stephansson O., Rutqvist J., Tsang C.-F., and Kautsky F. DECOVALEX - mathematical models of coupled T-H-M processes for nuclear waste repositories. Phase III report (1996)
6. DECOVALEX Secretariat. Definition of Bench-Mark-Test 1. Far - Field Model, DECOVALEX Series Document Doc91/103 (1991), Division of Engineering Geology, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
7. Millard A., Durin M., Stietel A., Thoraval A., Vuillod E., Baroudi H., Plas F., Bougnoux A., Vuoille G., Kobayashi A., Hara K., Fujita T., and Ohnishi Y. Discrete and continuum approaches to simulate the thermo-hydro-mechanical couplings in a large fractured rock mass. Int. J. Rock. Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr. 32 5 (1995) 409-434
8. DECOVALEX Secretariat. Definition of Bench-Mark-Test 2. Multiple Fracture Model, DECOVALEX Series Document Doc91/104 (1991), Division of Engineering Geology, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
9. Chan T., Khair K., Jing L., Ahola M., Noorishad J., and Vuillod E. International comparison of coupled thermo-hydro-mechanical models of a multiple-fracture bench mark problem: DECOVALEX Phase I, bench mark test 2. Int. J. Rock. Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr. 32 5 (1995) 435-452
10. DECOVALEX Secretariat. Definition of Bench-Mark-Test 3. Near - Field Repository Model, DECOVALEX Series Document Doc92/112 (1992), Division of Engineering Geology, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
11. Oda M. An equivalent continuum model for coupled stress fluid flow analysis in jointed rock massses. Water Resoc. Res. 22 31 (1986) 1845-1856
12. DECOVALEX Secretariat. Definition of Test Case 1. Stress - Flow Model, DECOVALEX Series Document Doc91/105 (1991), Division of Engineering Geology, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
13. Makurat A., Ahola M., Khair K., Noorishad J., Rosengren L., and Rutqvist J. The DECOVALEX Test-Case one. Int. J. Rock. Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr. 32 5 (1995) 399-408
14. DECOVALEX Secretariat. Definition of Test Case 1:2. Coupled Stress - Flow Model, Phase II, DECOVALEX Series Document Doc92/111 (1992), Division of Engineering Geology, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
15. Gros J.C. DECOVALEX - Phase 3,- Test Case 2 - Fanny-Augeres THM Test. Suggested test case for DEVOVALEX, Commissariat a I'Energie Atomique (CEA), Institut de Protection et de Surete Nuclealre (IPSN), Commission of the European C DPEI/SERGD Report No. 92/43 (1993)
16. Fujita T., Moro Y., Hara K., Kobayashi A., and Ohnishi Y. DECOVALEX - Specifications for test case 3 - Big-Ben Experiment (1993), Power Reactor Nuclear Fuel Development Corporation, Tokyo, Japan
17. Goodman R.E. The mechanical properties of joints. Proc. 3rd Cong. ISRM. Denver, U.S. National Academy of Sciences (1974) 127-140
18. Zhao J., and Brown E.T. Hydro-thermo-mechanical properties of fractures in the Carnmenellis granite. Quart. J. Eng. Geol. Vol. 25 (1992) 279-290
19. Gangi A.F. Variation of whole and fractured porous rock permeability with confining pressure. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. & Geomech. Abstr. 15 5 (1978) 249-257
20. Swan G. Determination of stiffness and other joint properties from roughness measurements. Rock Mech. & Rock Engng. 16 (1983) 19-38
21. Aug. 25-27. Gale J.E.-. The effects of fracture type (induced versus natural) on the stress-fracture closure-fracture permeability relationships. University of California, Berkeley. Proc. 23rd US Symp. on Rock Mechanics (1982) 290-298
22. Hsiung S.M., Kana D.D., Ahola M.P., Chowdhury A.H., and Ghosh A. Laboratory Characterization of rock joints. Research Report of Centre for Nuclear Waste Regulatory Analyses, TX, USA, NUREG/CR-6178, CNWRA 93-013 (1993)
23. DECOVALEX Secretariat. Definition of Test Case 6. Borehole Injection Test, DECOVALEX Series Document Doc93/139 (1993), Division of Engineering Geology, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
24. Wilcock P.M. The results of applying the NAPSAC fracture network code to model BMT3: the near field test case. AEA Report, D&W 0640, NSS/R365 (Draft) (1993), AEA Technology, Harwell, UK
25. May. Claesson J., Follin S., and Hellström G. High pressure testing on fractured crystalline rock - a note on the diffusion equation regarding Test Case 6 of DECOVALEX. SKB Arbetsrapport 94-48, Swedish Nuclear Waste Management Co. (SKB) (1994)